Topic
Glutathione S-Transferase A1
About: Glutathione S-Transferase A1 is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 33 publications have been published within this topic receiving 4240 citations.
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: The biochemical functions of GST are described to show how individual isoenzymes contribute to resistance to carcinogens, antitumor drugs, environmental pollutants, and products of oxidative stress, and to allow identification of factors that may modulate resistance to specific noxious chemicals.
Abstract: The glutathione S-transferases (GST) represent a major group of detoxification enzymes. All eukaryotic species possess multiple cytosolic and membrane-bound GST isoenzymes, each of which displays distinct catalytic as well as noncatalytic binding properties: the cytosolic enzymes are encoded by at least five distantly related gene families (designated class alpha, mu, pi, sigma, and theta GST), whereas the membrane-bound enzymes, microsomal GST and leukotriene C, synthetase, are encoded by single genes and both have arisen separately from the soluble GST. Evidence suggests that the level of expression of GST is a crucial factor in determining the sensitivity of cells to a broad spectrum of toxic chemicals. In this article the biochemical functions of GST are described to show how individual isoenzymes contribute to resistance to carcinogens, antitumor drugs, environmental pollutants, and products of oxidative stress.A description of the mechanisms of transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulat...
3,516 citations
TL;DR: Because the polymorphism in hGSTA1 correlates with hG STA1 and h GSTA2 expression in liver, and hGstA1-1 andhGSTa2-2 exhibit differential catalysis of the detoxification of carcinogen metabolites and chemotherapeutics,The polymorphism is expected to be of significance for individual risk of cancer or individual response to chemotherAPEutic agents.
Abstract: The patterns of expression of glutathione S-transferases A1 and A2 in human liver (hGSTA1 and hGSTA2, respectively) are highly variable, notably in the ratio of hGSTA1/hGSTA2. We investigated if this variation had a genetic basis by sequencing the proximal promoters (−721 to -1 nucleotides) of hGSTA
215 citations
TL;DR: It is concluded that detoxification of CHB by GSTA1-1 requires the removal of the glutathione conjugate formed and that either MRP1 or MRP2 can serve this efflux function.
Abstract: Our previous studies have shown that the glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) can operate in synergy with the efflux transporter multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1, ABCC1) to confer resistance to the cyto- and genotoxicities of some anticancer drugs and carcinogens. The current study was designed to determine whether the alternative efflux transporter, MRP2 (ABCC2), can also potentiate GST-mediated detoxifications in HepG2 cells. HepG2 cells, which express high-level MRP2 but not MRP1, were stably transduced with GST expression vectors under tetracycline-repressible transcriptional control. MRP2 was able to support GSTA1-1-mediated resistance to chlorambucil (CHB) cytotoxicity in HepG2 cells. Resistance was GST isozyme-specific in that GSTP1a-1a and GSTM1a-1a failed to confer protection from CHB toxicity. Moreover, inhibition of MRP2 with sulfinpyrazone completely reversed GSTA1-1-associated resistance, indicating that MRP2-efflux function is required to potentiate GSTA1-1-mediated resistance. Relative transport by MRP1 versus MRP2 of monoglutathionyl-CHB (CHB-SG) was examined using inside-out plasma membrane vesicles derived from MCF7 cells transduced with MRP1 or MRP2 expression vectors. Both MRP1 and MRP2 transported CHB-SG efficiently, at the levels of protein expressed, with similar Vmax and with Km of 0.39 and 10 microM, respectively. We conclude that detoxification of CHB by GSTA1-1 requires the removal of the glutathione conjugate formed and that either MRP1 or MRP2 can serve this efflux function. These findings have implications for the role of MRP2 in detoxification of alkylating agents in the apical epithelium of liver and kidney where it is highly expressed as well as the role of MRP2 in the emergence of alkylating drug resistance in cancer cells.
95 citations
TL;DR: It is hypothesized that low expression or function of GSTA1 in liver caused by genetic polymorphisms may be the mechanism underlying VOD, a severe complication associated with a high mortality.
Abstract: Background
High-dose busulfan is widely used as part of conditioning regimens for patients who are undergoing hematopoietic stem cell or bone marrow transplantation. High plasma concentrations of busulfan have been linked to the occurrence of hepatic venoocclusive disease (VOD), a severe complication associated with a high mortality. Because conjugation with glutathione, the major route of biotransformation of busulfan, is predominantly catalyzed by the isozyme glutathione S-transferase A1 (GSTA1), we hypothesized that low expression or function of GSTA1 in liver caused by genetic polymorphisms may be the mechanism underlying VOD.
Methods
Immunoblot analysis of GSTA and measurement of busulfan-glutathione conjugation by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry were performed in 48 normal human liver samples. To search for polymorphisms, the complete GSTA1 coding regions and the promoter fragment were sequenced. All results were compared by multivariate analysis.
Results
Absolute levels of GSTA protein and formation rates of busulfan-glutathione conjugate displayed a 7- and 8-fold range, from 240 to 1600 pmol/mg and 25 to 205 pmol/min per milligram of total cytosolic protein, respectively, and correlate (r2 = 0.49, P < .0001). A total of 8 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of GSTA1 were identified, 1 of which was a silent mutation in exon 5 (A375G); all others were found in the promoter region. Haplotype analysis revealed the existence of 5 defined alleles. There was no significant relationship between any of the GSTA1 SNPs or haplotypes and either hepatic glutathione S-transferase A (GSTA) expression or GSTA1 function.
Conclusions
The identified GSTA1 polymorphisms are not likely to be related to the VOD because they do not appear to be associated with changes in GSTA expression or function. Compared with other members of the GST family, GSTA1 displays surprisingly little variation.
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2002) 71, 479–487; doi: 10.1067/mcp.2002.124518
78 citations
TL;DR: Phe52 and Arg69 are the major determinants of dimer formation and a single mutation at either position substantially hinders dimerization, and the use of a mutant glutathione S-transferase which retains activity yet has a greatly weakened tendency to dimerize (such as R69E) may be advantageous for certain applications of GST fusion proteins.
Abstract: Alpha class glutathione S-transferase, isozyme A1-1, is a dimer (51 kDa) of identical subunits. Using the crystal structure, two main areas of subunit interaction were chosen for study: (1) the hydrophobic ball and socket comprised of Phe52 from one subunit fitting into a socket formed on the other subunit by Met94, Phe136, and Val139 and (2) the Arg/Glu region consisting of Arg69 and Glu97 from both subunits. We introduced substitutions of these residues, by site-directed mutagenesis, to evaluate the importance of each at the subunit interface and to determine if monomeric enzymes could be generated using single mutations. Mutating each residue of the socket region to alanine results in little change in the kinetic parameters, and all are dimeric enzymes. In contrast, when Phe52, the ball residue, is replaced with alanine, the enzyme has very low activity and a weight average molecular mass of 31.9 kDa, as determined by sedimentation equilibrium experiments. Substitutions for Glu97 which eliminate the c...
62 citations