scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers on "Graph database published in 1981"



Proceedings Article
Kurt Konoligc1
24 Aug 1981
TL;DR: This paper presents a method of formally representing the information that exists in a relational database as the model of a first-order language, and views the database as a mechanizable model of the database language to take advantage of the computational properties of database query language processors.
Abstract: This paper presents a method of formally representing the information that exists in a relational database. The primary utility of such a representation is for deductive question-answering systems that must access an existing relational database. To respond intelligently to user inquiries, such systems must have a more complete representation of the domain of discourse than is generally available in the database. The problem that then arises is how to reconcile the information present in the database with the domain representation, so that database queries can be derived to answer the user's inquiries. Here we take the formal approach of describing a relational database as the model of a first-order language. Another first-order language, the metalanguage, is used both to represent the domain of discourse, and to describe the relationship of the database to the domain. This view proves particularly useful in two respects. First, by axiomatiiing the database language and its associated model in a metatheory, we are able to describe in a powerful and flexible manner how the database corresponds to the domain of discourse. Secondly, viewing the database as a mechanizable model of the database language enables us to take advantage of the computational properties of database query language processors. Once a database query that is equivalent to an original query is derived, it can be evaluated against the database to determine the truth of the original query. Thus the algebraic operations of the database processor can be incorporated in an elegant way into the deductive process of question-answering.

10 citations


Proceedings Article
09 Sep 1981
TL;DR: The relationship between dependencies of local databases and dependencies appearing in a global view of a distributed database by local relational databases is shown and some conditions for a JD of a local database to appear in aglobal view as an EJD are shown.
Abstract: This paper discusses a constraint integration problem, which occurs in constructing a global view of a distributed database by local relational databases. Each local database has its own semantic constraints. such as functional, join and embedded join dependencies (FDs. JDs and EJDs, respectively). A global view of a distributed database is assumed to be defined by taking a join of these local databases. Some dependency constraints on a local database may be violated on a global view. In this paper, we show (a) the relationship between dependencies of local databases and dependencies appearing in a global view, (b) a testing method whether an EJD appears in a global view when only FDs and JDs are given to each local database, end (c) some conditions for a JD of a local database to appear in a global view as an EJD.

4 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The performance of the proposal method was better than Interpretive Structural Model which applies 1-0 reachability matrix for cluster analysis of some scientific articles.

3 citations