GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits

About: GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 304 publications have been published within this topic receiving 19915 citations.

Carboxyl-terminal mutations of Gq alpha and Gs alpha that alter the fidelity of receptor activation.

Abstract: The carboxyl terminus of the G protein alpha subunit is a key determinant of the fidelity of receptor activation. We have previously shown that the Gq alpha subunit (alpha q) can be made to respond to alpha i-coupled receptors by replacing its carboxyl terminus with the corresponding alpha i2, alpha o, alpha z residues. We now extend these findings in three ways: 1) carboxyl-terminal mutations of alpha q/alpha i chimeras show that the critical amino acids are in the -3 and -4 positions, 2) exchange of carboxyl termini between alpha q and alpha z allows activation by receptors appropriate to the carboxyl-terminal residues, and 3) we identify receptors that either do or do not activate the expected carboxyl-terminal chimeras (alpha q/alpha i, alpha q/alpha s, alpha s/alpha q). Replacement of the five carboxyl-terminal amino acids of alpha q with the alpha s sequence permitted an alpha s-coupled receptor (the V2 vasopressin receptor but not the beta 2-adrenergic receptor) to stimulate phospholipase C. Replacement of the five carboxyl-terminal amino acids of alpha z with residues of alpha q permitted certain alpha q-coupled receptors (bombesin and V1a vasopressin receptors but not the oxytocin receptor) to stimulate adenylyl cyclase. Thus, the relative importance of the G alpha carboxyl terminus in permitting coupling to a new receptor depends on the receptor with which it is paired. These studies refine our understanding and provide new tools with which to study the fidelity of receptor/G alpha activation.

GIV is a nonreceptor GEF for Gαi with a unique motif that regulates Akt signaling

Abstract: Heterotrimeric G proteins are molecular switches that control signal transduction. Ligand-occupied, G protein-coupled receptors serve as the canonical guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) that activate heterotrimeric G proteins. A few unrelated nonreceptor GEFs have also been described, but little or nothing is known about their structure, mechanism of action, or cellular functions in mammals. We have discovered that GIV/Girdin serves as a nonreceptor GEF for G alpha i through an evolutionarily conserved motif that shares sequence homology with the synthetic GEF peptide KB-752. Using the available structure of the KB-752 x G alpha i1 complex as a template, we modeled the G alpha i-GIV interface and identified the key residues that are required to form it. Mutation of these key residues disrupts the interaction and impairs Akt enhancement, actin remodeling, and cell migration in cancer cells. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that the GEF motif is capable of activating as well as sequestering the G alpha-subunit, thereby enhancing Akt signaling via the G betagamma-PI3K pathway. Recently, GIV has been implicated in cancer metastasis by virtue of its ability to enhance Akt activity and remodel the actin cytoskeleton during cancer invasion. Thus, the novel regulatory motif described here provides the structural and biochemical basis for the prometastatic features of GIV, making the functional disruption of this unique G alpha i-GIV interface a promising target for therapy against cancer metastasis.

Distinct profiles of functional discrimination among G proteins determine the actions of G protein–coupled receptors

Abstract: Members of the heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptor (GPCR) family play key roles in many physiological functions and are extensively exploited pharmacologically to treat diseases. Many of the diverse effects of individual GPCRs on cellular physiology are transduced by heterotrimeric G proteins, which are composed of α, β, and γ subunits. GPCRs interact with and stimulate the binding of guanosine triphosphate (GTP) to the α subunit to initiate signaling. Mammalian genomes encode 16 different G protein α subunits, each one of which has distinct properties. We developed a single-platform, optical strategy to monitor G protein activation in live cells. With this system, we profiled the coupling ability of individual GPCRs for different α subunits, simultaneously quantifying the magnitude of the signal and the rates at which the receptors activated the G proteins. We found that individual receptors engaged multiple G proteins with varying efficacy and kinetics, generating fingerprint-like profiles. Different classes of GPCR ligands, including full and partial agonists, allosteric modulators, and antagonists, distinctly affected these fingerprints to functionally bias GPCR signaling. Finally, we showed that intracellular signaling modulators further altered the G protein-coupling profiles of GPCRs, which suggests that their differential abundance may alter signaling outcomes in a cell-specific manner. These observations suggest that the diversity of the effects of GPCRs on cellular physiology may be determined by their differential engagement of multiple G proteins, coupling to which produces signals with varying signal magnitudes and activation kinetics, properties that may be exploited pharmacologically.

Structural diversity in the RGS domain and its interaction with heterotrimeric G protein alpha-subunits.

Abstract: Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins accelerate GTP hydrolysis by Gα subunits and thus facilitate termination of signaling initiated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). RGS proteins hold great promise as disease intervention points, given their signature role as negative regulators of GPCRs—receptors to which the largest fraction of approved medications are currently directed. RGS proteins share a hallmark RGS domain that interacts most avidly with Gα when in its transition state for GTP hydrolysis; by binding and stabilizing switch regions I and II of Gα, RGS domain binding consequently accelerates Gα-mediated GTP hydrolysis. The human genome encodes more than three dozen RGS domain-containing proteins with varied Gα substrate specificities. To facilitate their exploitation as drug-discovery targets, we have taken a systematic structural biology approach toward cataloging the structural diversity present among RGS domains and identifying molecular determinants of their differential Gα selectivities. Here, we determined 14 structures derived from NMR and x-ray crystallography of members of the R4, R7, R12, and RZ subfamilies of RGS proteins, including 10 uncomplexed RGS domains and 4 RGS domain/Gα complexes. Heterogeneity observed in the structural architecture of the RGS domain, as well as in engagement of switch III and the all-helical domain of the Gα substrate, suggests that unique structural determinants specific to particular RGS protein/Gα pairings exist and could be used to achieve selective inhibition by small molecules.

Cryo-EM structure of the serotonin 5-HT1Breceptor coupled to heterotrimeric Go.

Abstract: G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) form the largest family of receptors encoded by the human genome (around 800 genes). They transduce signals by coupling to a small number of heterotrimeric G proteins (16 genes encoding different α-subunits). Each human cell contains several GPCRs and G proteins. The structural determinants of coupling of Gs to four different GPCRs have been elucidated1-4, but the molecular details of how the other G-protein classes couple to GPCRs are unknown. Here we present the cryo-electron microscopy structure of the serotonin 5-HT1B receptor (5-HT1BR) bound to the agonist donitriptan and coupled to an engineered Go heterotrimer. In this complex, 5-HT1BR is in an active state; the intracellular domain of the receptor is in a similar conformation to that observed for the β2-adrenoceptor (β2AR) 3 or the adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) 1 in complex with Gs. In contrast to the complexes with Gs, the gap between the receptor and the Gβ-subunit in the Go-5-HT1BR complex precludes molecular contacts, and the interface between the Gα-subunit of Go and the receptor is considerably smaller. These differences are likely to be caused by the differences in the interactions with the C terminus of the Go α-subunit. The molecular variations between the interfaces of Go and Gs in complex with GPCRs may contribute substantially to both the specificity of coupling and the kinetics of signalling.