Showing papers on "Hamlet (place) published in 1974"
Book•
01 Jan 197419 citations
TL;DR: The authors argued that it is seriously mistaken to see Hamlet as something of a skeptic about our knowledge of other minds, and pointed out that one can hardly be blamed for reading such a suggestion into his first extensive speech.
Abstract: I SHALL PRESENTLY argue that it is seriously mistaken to see Hamlet as something of a skeptic about our knowledge of other minds. But I should like to point out that one can hardly be blamed for reading such a suggestion into his first extensive speech. What strongly tempts us in this direction is not merely that Hamlet denies the possibility, even in principle, of plucking out the heart of his own mystery, but that he gives us no grounds for exempting other people's mysteries from the same iron law:
2 citations
Book•
01 Jan 1974
2 citations
1 citations
Journal Article•
1 citations
TL;DR: Polonius and Fortinbras (and hamlet?) English Studies: Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 218-238 as discussed by the authors, was published in 1974.
Abstract: (1974). Polonius, and fortinbras (and hamlet?) English Studies: Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 218-238.
1 citations
1 citations
Book•
01 Jan 1974
TL;DR: W. B. Donne, writing to Mrs. Fanny Kemble in America, called it the most remarkable event in current history, setting aside Garibaldi and The Civil War on your side of the water as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: W. B. Donne, writing to Mrs. Fanny Kemble in America, called it “the most remarkable event in current history, setting aside Garibaldi and The Civil War on your side of the water.…” Speaking of the same event, Charles Dickens was later to declare: “Perhaps no innovation in Art was ever accepted with so much favor by so many intellectual persons precommitted to, and preoccupied by, another system.…”