scispace - formally typeset
Topic

Health care

About: Health care is a(n) research topic. Over the lifetime, 342157 publication(s) have been published within this topic receiving 7214284 citation(s). The topic is also known as: healthcare & medical care.

...read more

Papers
  More

Open accessJournal ArticleDOI: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000133083.54934.AE
01 Aug 2004-Annals of Surgery
Abstract: Growing demand for health care, rising costs, constrained resources, and evidence of variations in clinical practice have triggered interest in measuring and improving the quality of health care delivery. For a valuable quality assessment, relevant data on outcome must be obtained in a standardized and reproducible manner to allow comparison among different centers, between different therapies and within a center over time.1–3 Objective and reliable outcome data are increasingly requested by patients and payers (government or private insurance) to assess quality and costs of health care. Moreover, health policy makers point out that the availability of comparative data on individual hospital's and physician's performance represents a powerful market force, which may contribute to limit the costs of health care while improving quality.4 Conclusive assessments of surgical procedures remain limited by the lack of consensus on how to define complications and to stratify them by severity.1,5–8 In 1992, we proposed general principles to classify complications of surgery based on a therapy-oriented, 4-level severity grading.1 Subsequently, the severity grading was refined and applied to compare the results of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy9 and liver transplantation.10 This classification has also been used by others11–13 and was recently suggested to serve as the basis to assess the outcome of living related liver transplantation in the United States (J. Trotter, personal communication). However, the classification system has not yet been widely used in the surgical literature. The strength of the previous classification relied on the principle of grading complications based on the therapy used to treat the complication. This approach allows identification of most complications and prevents down-rating of major negative outcomes. This is particularly important in retrospective analyses. However, we felt that modifications were necessary, particularly in grading life-threatening complications and long-term disability due to a complication. We also felt that the duration of the hospital stay can no longer be used as a criterion to grade complications. Although definitions of negative outcomes rely to a large extend on subjective “value” appraisals, the grading system must be tested in a large cohort of patients. Finally, a classification is useful only if widely accepted and applied throughout different countries and surgical cultures. Such a validation was not done with the previous classification. Therefore, the aim of the current study was 3-fold: first, to propose an improved classification of surgical complications based on our experience gained with the previous classification1; second, to test this classification in a large cohort of patients who underwent general surgery; and third, to assess the reproducibility and acceptability of the classification through an international survey.

...read more

18,696 Citations


Open accessJournal ArticleDOI: 10.1164/RCCM.201204-0596PP
Jørgen Vestbo1, Suzanne S. Hurd, Alvar Agusti2, Paul W. Jones3  +9 moreInstitutions (10)
Abstract: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains a major public health problem. It is the fourth leading cause of chronic morbidity and mortality in the United States, and is projected to rank fifth in 2020 in burden of disease worldwide, according to a study published by the World Bank/World Health Organization. Yet, COPD remains relatively unknown or ignored by the public as well as public health and government officials. In 1998, in an effort to bring more attention to COPD, its management, and its prevention, a committed group of scientists encouraged the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the World Health Organization to form the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Among the important objectives of GOLD are to increase awareness of COPD and to help the millions of people who suffer from this disease and die prematurely of it or its complications. The first step in the GOLD program was to prepare a consensus report, Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of COPD, published in 2001. The present, newly revised document follows the same format as the original consensus report, but has been updated to reflect the many publications on COPD that have appeared. GOLD national leaders, a network of international experts, have initiated investigations of the causes and prevalence of COPD in their countries, and developed innovative approaches for the dissemination and implementation of COPD management guidelines. We appreciate the enormous amount of work the GOLD national leaders have done on behalf of their patients with COPD. Despite the achievements in the 5 years since the GOLD report was originally published, considerable additional work is ahead of us if we are to control this major public health problem. The GOLD initiative will continue to bring COPD to the attention of governments, public health officials, health care workers, and the general public, but a concerted effort by all involved in health care will be necessary.

...read more

Topics: Global health (58%), Health care (57%), Public health (57%) ...read more

16,210 Citations


Open accessJournal ArticleDOI: 10.1136/BMJ.323.7322.1192
17 Nov 2001-BMJ
Abstract: Crossing the Quality Chasm identifies and recommends improvements in six dimensions of health care in the U.S.: patient safety, care effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, care efficiency, and equity. Safety looks at reducing the likelihood that patients are harmed by medical errors. Effectiveness describes avoiding over and underuse of resources and services. Patient-centeredness relates both to customer service and to considering and accommodating individual patient needs when making care decisions. Timeliness emphasizes reducing wait times. Efficiency focuses on reducing waste and, as a result, total cost of care. Equity looks at closing racial and income gaps in health care.

...read more

14,493 Citations


Open accessJournal ArticleDOI: 10.1136/BMJ.312.7023.71
David L. Sackett1, William Rosenberg1, Jam Gray1, Richard Haynes1  +1 moreInstitutions (1)
13 Jan 1996-BMJ
Abstract: It's about integrating individual clinical expertise and the best external evidence Evidence based medicine, whose philosophical origins extend back to mid-19th century Paris and earlier, remains a hot topic for clinicians, public health practitioners, purchasers, planners, and the public. There are now frequent workshops in how to practice and teach it (one sponsored by the BMJ will be held in London on 24 April); undergraduate1 and postgraduate2 training programmes are incorporating it3 (or pondering how to do so); British centres for evidence based practice have been established or planned in adult medicine, child health, surgery, pathology, pharmacotherapy, nursing, general practice, and dentistry; the Cochrane Collaboration and Britain's Centre for Review and Dissemination in York are providing systematic reviews of the effects of health care; new evidence based practice journals are being launched; and it has become a common topic in the lay media. But enthusiasm has been mixed with some negative reaction.4 5 6 Criticism has ranged from evidence based medicine being old hat to it being a dangerous innovation, perpetrated by the arrogant to serve cost cutters and suppress clinical freedom. As evidence based medicine continues to evolve and adapt, now is a useful time to refine the discussion of what it is and what it is not. Evidence based medicine is the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. The …

...read more

Topics: Evidence-based medicine (64%), Evidence-based practice (63%), Evidence-based management (61%) ...read more

11,270 Citations


Open accessJournal ArticleDOI: 10.1136/BMJ.39489.470347.AD
24 Apr 2008-BMJ
Abstract: Guidelines are inconsistent in how they rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. This article explores the advantages of the GRADE system, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide

...read more

Topics: Evidence-based medicine (61%), MEDLINE (54%), Health care (52%) ...read more

10,080 Citations


Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2022199
202118,090
202018,759
201915,395
201814,491
201716,963

Top Attributes

Show by:

Topic's top 5 most impactful authors

Martin McKee

214 papers, 10.9K citations

Jeffrey Braithwaite

98 papers, 2.8K citations

Michel Wensing

94 papers, 4.1K citations

Stephen M. Shortell

91 papers, 7.3K citations

Peter J. Pronovost

86 papers, 6.4K citations

Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Health policy

79.6K papers, 2M citations

93% related
HRHIS

19.3K papers, 431.6K citations

92% related
Health services research

18.3K papers, 748.4K citations

92% related
Psychological intervention

82.6K papers, 2.6M citations

92% related
Patient safety

27.8K papers, 535.7K citations

92% related