scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Hypothalamus

About: Hypothalamus is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 22301 publications have been published within this topic receiving 1085925 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Detailed and comparative mapping of Y1 and Y5 receptor subtypes within cell bodies and nerve fibers in the brain which, together with physiological and electrophysiological studies, provide a better understanding of NPY neural circuitries.
Abstract: Neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y1 and Y5 receptor subtypes mediate many of NPY’s diverse actions in the central nervous system. The present studies use polyclonal antibodies directed against the Y1 and Y5 receptors to map and compare the relative distribution of these NPY receptor subtypes within the rat brain. Antibody specificity was assessed by using Western analysis, preadsorption of the antibody with peptide, and preimmune serum controls. Immunostaining for the Y1 and Y5 receptor subtypes was present throughout the rostral– caudal aspect of the brain with many regions expressing both subtypes: cerebral cortex, hippocampus, hypothalamus, thalamus, amygdala, and brainstem. Further studies using double-label immunocytochemistry indicate that Y1R immunoreactivity (-ir) and Y5R-ir are colocalized in the cerebral cortex and caudate putamen. Y1 receptor ir was evident in the central amygdala, whereas both Y1- and Y5-immunoreactive cells and fibers were present in the basolateral amygdala. Corresponding with the physiology of NPY in the hypothalamus, both Y1R- and Y5R-ir was present within the paraventricular (PVN), supraoptic, arcuate nuclei, and lateral hypothalamus. In the PVN, Y5R-ir and Y1R-ir were detected in cells and fibers of the parvo- and magnocellular divisions. Intense immunostaining for these receptors was observed within the locus coeruleus, A1–5 and C1–3 nuclei, subnuclei of the trigeminal nerve and nucleus tractus solitarius. These data provide a detailed and comparative mapping of Y1 and Y5 receptor subtypes within cell bodies and nerve fibers in the brain which, together with physiological and electrophysiological studies, provide a better understanding of NPY neural circuitries. J. Comp. Neurol. 464:285–311, 2003. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Indexing terms: NPY; hypothalamus; hippocampus; amygdala

206 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The time course of the neuroendocrine response of Piebald-Viral-Glaxo (PVG) rats during the development of mycobacterially induced adjuvant arthritis is determined and a common paradox of a marked increase in adenohypophyseal POMC mRNA not associated with increased CRF mRNA or peptide release is shown.
Abstract: We have determined the time course of the neuroendocrine response of Piebald-Viral-Glaxo (PVG) rats during the development of mycobacterially induced adjuvant arthritis. Anterior pituitary POMC mRNA increased at the time of onset of mycobacterially induced arthritis, but, paradoxically, coincident with the first signs of arthritis there was a consistent fall in CRF mRNA in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. Coincident with this fall in CRF message, there was a corresponding decrease in CRF-41 peptide release into the hypophysial portal blood (HPB). In contrast, however, vasopressin release into the HPB was increased. There was an increase in adrenal weight associated with the development of arthritis, reflecting chronic activation of the HPA axis, which was reflected by increased circulating corticosterone concentrations. The synthetic adjuvant CP20961, which has different antigenic determinants, also caused an increase in POMC mRNA in the anterior pituitary, a decrease in CRF mRNA in the hypothala...

206 citations

01 Jun 1980
TL;DR: A brief review is given of some of the recent neuroanatomical studies of the central autonomic pathways and certain nuclei of the brain that function as autonomic centers are extensively interconnected, which may play an important role in cardiovascular regulation and related neuroendocrine functions.
Abstract: A brief review is given of some of the recent neuroanatomical studies of the central autonomic pathways. Two major points are discussed. 1) There are several descending inputs to the intermediolateral cell column that have recently been demonstrated; these include the A5 catecholamine cell group, certain of the raphe nuclei, the nucleus of the solitary tract, the Kolliker Fuse nucleus, and the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. 2) Certain nuclei of the brain that function as autonomic centers are extensively interconnected: the nucleus of the solitary tract, the parabrachial nucleus, the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, the central nucleus of the amygdala, and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. This network may play an important role in cardiovascular regulation and related neuroendocrine functions.

206 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that CB1 deficiency enhances the circadian HPA axis activity peak and leads to central impairment of glucocorticoid feedback, thus further outlining the essential role of the endocannabinoid system in the modulation of neuroendocrine functions.
Abstract: The endocannabinoid system affects the neuroendocrine regulation of hormone secretion, including the activity of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. However, the mechanisms by which endocannabinoids regulate HPA axis function have remained unclear. Here we demonstrate that mice lacking cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1-/-) display a significant dysregulation of the HPA axis. Although circadian HPA axis responsiveness is preserved, CB1-/- mice are characterized by an enhanced circadian drive on the HPA axis, resulting in elevated plasma corticosterone concentrations at the onset of the dark as compared with wild-type (CB1+/+) littermates. Moreover, CB1-/--derived pituitary cells respond with a significantly higher ACTH secretion to CRH and forskolin challenges as compared with pituitary cells derived from CB1+/+ mice. Both CBL-/- and CB1+/+ mice properly respond to a high-dose dexamethasone test, but response to low-dose dexamethasone is influenced by genotype. In addition, CB1-/- mice show increased CRH mRNA levels in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus but not in other extrahypothalamic areas, such as the amygdala and piriform cortex, in which CB1 and CRH mRNA have been colocalized. Finally, CB1-/- mice have selective glucocorticoid receptor mRNA down-regulation in the CA1 region of the hippocampus but not in the dentate gyrus or paraventricular nucleus. Conversely, mineralocorticoid receptor mRNA expression levels were found unchanged in these brain areas. In conclusion, our findings indicate that CB1 deficiency enhances the circadian HPA axis activity peak and leads to central impairment of glucocorticoid feedback, thus further outlining the essential role of the endocannabinoid system in the modulation of neuroendocrine functions.

205 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is suggested that TRH, and possibly SRIF, may play a physiological role in control of food intake, perhaps by altering the neural activity within the ventromedial nucleus.
Abstract: Since both TRH and somatostatin (SRIF) are localized to the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus, a region known to be involved in control of food intake, the possibility that these peptides might alter food intake was evaluated. The peptides were dissolved in 0.9% NaCl and injected into the 3d ventricle in a volume of 2 micron1 in animals bearing 3d ventricular cannulae. Food and water had been removed from the cages the night before and the intake was measured at 1 and 6 h after injection. Control injections of 0.15M NaCl or glutathione (3 nmoles) had no effect on food or water intake. At a dose of 3 nmoles, LHRH, SRIF, and TRH suppressed water intake alh. Lowering the dose of LHRH and SRIF to 0.6 nmoles led to loss of this inhibition but the suppressive effect of TRH, which was more pronounced at the higher dose than that of the other two peptides, persisted. Lowering the dose of TRH to 0.3 nmoles led to loss of the inhibitory effect. The dose of 3 nmoles of LHRH did not suppress food intake but this dose of both SRIF and TRH had a significant suppressive effect on food intake at 1 h. There was no suppressive action of a lower dose of 0.6 nmoles of SRIF, but TRH was still effective to suppress food intake at this dose. A dose of 0.3 nmoles of TRH had no effect on food intake. It is suggested that TRH, and possibly SRIF may play a physiological role in control of food intake, perhaps by altering the neural activity within the ventromedial nucleus.

205 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Dopamine
45.7K papers, 2.2M citations
90% related
Stimulation
40.1K papers, 1.4M citations
90% related
Dopaminergic
29K papers, 1.4M citations
89% related
Hippocampus
34.9K papers, 1.9M citations
88% related
Hippocampal formation
30.6K papers, 1.7M citations
87% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023425
2022950
2021295
2020316
2019326
2018289