scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Insider

About: Insider is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 5339 publications have been published within this topic receiving 132122 citations. The topic is also known as: Insider Inc..


Papers
More filters
Posted Content
TL;DR: This paper examined the use of seven mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders, including shareholdings of insiders, institutions, and large blockholders, use of outside directors, debt policy, managerial labor market, and market for corporate control.
Abstract: This paper examines the use of seven mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. These mechanisms are: shareholdings of insiders, institutions, and large blockholders; use of outside directors; debt policy; the managerial labor market; and the market for corporate control. We present direct empirical evidence of interdependence among these mechanisms in a large sample of firms. This finding suggests that cross-sectional OLS regressions of firm performance on single mechanisms may be misleading. Indeed, we find relations between firm performance and four of the mechanisms when each is included in a separate OLS regression. These are insider shareholdings, outside directors, debt, and corporate control activity. Importantly, the effect of insider shareholdings disappears when all of the mechanisms are included in a single OLS regression, and the effects of debt and corporate control activity also disappear when estimations are made in a simultaneous systems framework. Together, these findings are consistent with optimal use of each control mechanism except outside directors.

2,719 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors examined the use of seven mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders, including shareholdings of insiders, institutions, and large blockholders, use of outside directors, debt policy, managerial labor market, and market for corporate control.
Abstract: This paper examines the use of seven mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. These mechanisms are: shareholdings of insiders, institutions, and large blockholders; use of outside directors; debt policy; the managerial labor market; and the market for corporate control. We present direct empirical evidence of interdependence among these mechanisms in a large sample of firms. This finding suggests that crosssectional OLS regressions of firm performance on single mechanisms may be misleading. Indeed, we find relationships between firm performance and four of the mechanisms when each is included in a separate OLS regression. These are insider shareholdings, outside directors, debt, and corporate control activity. Importantly, the effect of insider shareholdings disappears when all of the mechanisms are included in a single OLS regression, and the effects of debt and corporate control activity also disappear when estimations are made in a simultaneous systems framework. Together, these findings are consistent with optimal use of each control mechanism except outside directors.

2,372 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore membership roles by illustrating the insider status of one author and the outsider status of the other when conducting research with specific parent groups, and explore the strengths and challenges of conducting qualitative research from each membership status.
Abstract: Should qualitative researchers be members of the population they are studying, or should they not? Although this issue has been explored within the context of qualitative research, it has generally been reserved for discussions of observation, field research, and ethnography. The authors expand that discussion and explore membership roles by illustrating the insider status of one author and the outsider status of the other when conducting research with specific parent groups. The strengths and challenges of conducting qualitative research from each membership status are examined. Rather than consider this issue from a dichotomous perspective, the authors explore the notion of the space between that allows researchers to occupy the position of both insider and outsider rather than insider or outsider.

2,064 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on research and development (R&D) as a potential source of insider gains and find that insider gains in R&D-intensive firms are substantially larger than insider gains without R&DI.
Abstract: Although researchers have documented gains from insider trading, the sources of private information leading to information asymmetry and insider gains have not been comprehensively investigated. We focus on research and development (R&D)—an increasingly important yet poorly disclosed productive input—as a potential source of insider gains. Our findings, for the period from 1985 to 1997 indicate that insider gains in R&D-intensive firms are substantially larger than insider gains in firms without R&D. Insiders also take advantage of information on planned changes in R&D budgets. R&D is thus a major contributor to information asymmetry and insider gains, raising issues concerning management compensation, incentives, and disclosure policies.

1,457 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The insider doctrine as discussed by the authors is a sociological notion that the outsider has a structural or psychological incapacity for access to new knowledge in the context of social change and conflict, and it can be described as the doctrine of the insider, which includes complementary claims of access to knowledge grounded on the assumption of socially based detachment.
Abstract: The social relevance of perspective established in the sociology of knowledge becomes evident during times of great social change and conflict. Conflict makes for a total functionalizing of thought which is interpreted only in terms of its alleged social, economic, political, or psychological sources and functions. Deepened social conflict today renews the relevance of an old problem in the sociology of knowledge: socially patterned differentials in access to new knowledge. As groups and collectivities become more self-conscious and solidary under conditions of social polarization, their members tend to claim unique or privileged access to certain kinds of knowledge. This can be described as the doctrine of the Insider, which includes the correlative claim that the Outsider has a structurally imposed incapacity for access to such knowledge. Outsider doctrine involves complementary claims of access to knowledge grounded on the assumption of socially based detachment. The rationale of the Insider doctrine i...

1,336 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Corporate governance
118.5K papers, 2.7M citations
81% related
Empirical research
51.3K papers, 1.9M citations
81% related
Globalization
81.8K papers, 1.7M citations
79% related
Politics
263.7K papers, 5.3M citations
79% related
Public policy
76.7K papers, 1.6M citations
79% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023383
2022823
2021215
2020238
2019232
2018220