scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Interaction network

About: Interaction network is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 2700 publications have been published within this topic receiving 113372 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
03 Feb 2005-Nature
TL;DR: Insight is provided into the function of previously uncharacterized bacterial proteins and the overall topology of a microbial interaction network, the core components of which are broadly conserved across Prokaryota.
Abstract: Proteins often function as components of multi-subunit complexes. Despite its long history as a model organism, no large-scale analysis of protein complexes in Escherichia coli has yet been reported. To this end, we have targeted DNA cassettes into the E. coli chromosome to create carboxy-terminal, affinity-tagged alleles of 1,000 open reading frames (approximately 23% of the genome). A total of 857 proteins, including 198 of the most highly conserved, soluble non-ribosomal proteins essential in at least one bacterial species, were tagged successfully, whereas 648 could be purified to homogeneity and their interacting protein partners identified by mass spectrometry. An interaction network of protein complexes involved in diverse biological processes was uncovered and validated by sequential rounds of tagging and purification. This network includes many new interactions as well as interactions predicted based solely on genomic inference or limited phenotypic data. This study provides insight into the function of previously uncharacterized bacterial proteins and the overall topology of a microbial interaction network, the core components of which are broadly conserved across Prokaryota.

1,175 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A new centrality measure that characterizes the participation of each node in all subgraphs in a network, C(S)(i), which is better able to discriminate the nodes of a network than alternate measures such as degree, closeness, betweenness, and eigenvector centralities.
Abstract: We introduce a new centrality measure that characterizes the participation of each node in all subgraphs in a network. Smaller subgraphs are given more weight than larger ones, which makes this measure appropriate for characterizing network motifs. We show that the subgraph centrality [C(S)(i)] can be obtained mathematically from the spectra of the adjacency matrix of the network. This measure is better able to discriminate the nodes of a network than alternate measures such as degree, closeness, betweenness, and eigenvector centralities. We study eight real-world networks for which C(S)(i) displays useful and desirable properties, such as clear ranking of nodes and scale-free characteristics. Compared with the number of links per node, the ranking introduced by C(S)(i) (for the nodes in the protein interaction network of S. cereviciae) is more highly correlated with the lethality of individual proteins removed from the proteome.

1,102 citations

Proceedings Article
05 Dec 2016
TL;DR: The interaction network is introduced, a model which can reason about how objects in complex systems interact, supporting dynamical predictions, as well as inferences about the abstract properties of the system, and is implemented using deep neural networks.
Abstract: Reasoning about objects, relations, and physics is central to human intelligence, and a key goal of artificial intelligence. Here we introduce the interaction network, a model which can reason about how objects in complex systems interact, supporting dynamical predictions, as well as inferences about the abstract properties of the system. Our model takes graphs as input, performs object- and relation-centric reasoning in a way that is analogous to a simulation, and is implemented using deep neural networks. We evaluate its ability to reason about several challenging physical domains: n-body problems, rigid-body collision, and non-rigid dynamics. Our results show it can be trained to accurately simulate the physical trajectories of dozens of objects over thousands of time steps, estimate abstract quantities such as energy, and generalize automatically to systems with different numbers and configurations of objects and relations. Our interaction network implementation is the first general-purpose, learnable physics engine, and a powerful general framework for reasoning about object and relations in a wide variety of complex real-world domains.

1,060 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In the new, fifth release of STITCH, functionality to filter out the proteins and chemicals not associated with a given tissue is implemented and a new network view is implemented that gives the user the ability to view binding affinities of chemicals in the interaction network.
Abstract: Interactions between proteins and small molecules are an integral part of biological processes in living organisms. Information on these interactions is dispersed over many databases, texts and prediction methods, which makes it difficult to get a comprehensive overview of the available evidence. To address this, we have developed STITCH ('Search Tool for Interacting Chemicals') that integrates these disparate data sources for 430 000 chemicals into a single, easy-to-use resource. In addition to the increased scope of the database, we have implemented a new network view that gives the user the ability to view binding affinities of chemicals in the interaction network. This enables the user to get a quick overview of the potential effects of the chemical on its interaction partners. For each organism, STITCH provides a global network; however, not all proteins have the same pattern of spatial expression. Therefore, only a certain subset of interactions can occur simultaneously. In the new, fifth release of STITCH, we have implemented functionality to filter out the proteins and chemicals not associated with a given tissue. The STITCH database can be downloaded in full, accessed programmatically via an extensive API, or searched via a redesigned web interface at http://stitch.embl.de.

989 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jul 2008
TL;DR: This article characterize four classes of drug–target interaction networks in humans involving enzymes, ion channels, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and nuclear receptors, and reveal significant correlations between drug structure similarity, target sequence similarity and the drug– target interaction network topology.
Abstract: Motivation: The identification of interactions between drugs and target proteins is a key area in genomic drug discovery. Therefore, there is a strong incentive to develop new methods capable of detecting these potential drug–target interactions efficiently. Results: In this article, we characterize four classes of drug–target interaction networks in humans involving enzymes, ion channels, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and nuclear receptors, and reveal significant correlations between drug structure similarity, target sequence similarity and the drug–target interaction network topology. We then develop new statistical methods to predict unknown drug–target interaction networks from chemical structure and genomic sequence information simultaneously on a large scale. The originality of the proposed method lies in the formalization of the drug–target interaction inference as a supervised learning problem for a bipartite graph, the lack of need for 3D structure information of the target proteins, and in the integration of chemical and genomic spaces into a unified space that we call ‘pharmacological space’. In the results, we demonstrate the usefulness of our proposed method for the prediction of the four classes of drug–target interaction networks. Our comprehensively predicted drug–target interaction networks enable us to suggest many potential drug–target interactions and to increase research productivity toward genomic drug discovery. Availability: Softwares are available upon request. Contact: Yoshihiro.Yamanishi@ensmp.fr Supplementary information: Datasets and all prediction results are available at http://web.kuicr.kyoto-u.ac.jp/supp/yoshi/drugtarget/.

926 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Genome
74.2K papers, 3.8M citations
83% related
Regulation of gene expression
85.4K papers, 5.8M citations
81% related
Cluster analysis
146.5K papers, 2.9M citations
80% related
Gene
211.7K papers, 10.3M citations
79% related
Transcription factor
82.8K papers, 5.4M citations
78% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202337
202290
2021183
2020221
2019201
2018163