Topic
Intra-rater reliability
About: Intra-rater reliability is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 2073 publications have been published within this topic receiving 140968 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
Book•
01 Jun 1996TL;DR: Partial Safety Factor Method Probabilistic Information Simple Reliability Index Geometricreliability Index Generalized Reliability index Transformation Sensitivity Analysis Monte Carlo Methods Load Combinations Statistical and Model Uncertainty Decision Philosophy Reliability of Existing Structures System Reliability Analysis.
Abstract: Partial Safety Factor Method Probabilistic Information Simple Reliability Index Geometric Reliability Index Generalized Reliability Index Transformation Sensitivity Analysis Monte Carlo Methods Load Combinations Statistical and Model Uncertainty Decision Philosophy Reliability of Existing Structures System Reliability Analysis Introduction to Process Descriptions.
1,852 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors developed guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies in interrater and intra-arater reliability and agreements, and proposed 15 issues that should be addressed when reporting such studies.
1,605 citations
Book•
01 Jan 1996
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a basic reliability model for failure distribution and a constant failure rate model for time-dependent failure models, as well as a design for maintainability.
Abstract: 1 IntroductionI Basic Reliability Models2 The Failure Distribution3 Constant Failure Rate Model4 Time-Dependent Failure Models5 Reliability of Systems6 State Dependent Systems7 Physical Reliability Models8 Design for Reliability9 Maintainability10 Design for Maintainability11 AvailabilityII The Analysis of Failure Data12 Data Collection and Empirical Methods13 Reliability Testing14 Reliability Growth Testing15 Identifying Failure and Repair Distributions16 Goodness-of-Fit TestsIII Application17 Reliability Estimation and Application18 Implementation
1,469 citations
TL;DR: This paper reviews the most frequently used and misused reliability measures appearing in the mental health literature and suggests some suitable reliability measures to be used.
Abstract: This paper reviews the most frequently used and misused reliability measures appearing in the mental health literature. We illustrate the various types of data sets on which reliability is assessed (i.e., two raters, more than two raters, and varying numbers of raters with dichotomous, polychotomous, and quantitative data). Reliability statistics appropriate for each data format are presented, and their pros and cons illustrated. Inadequancies of some methods are highlighted. The meaning of different levels of reliability obtained with various statistics is discussed. This critique is intended for the reading professional and the investigator who has an occasional need for reliability assessment. Statistical expertise is not required and theoretical material is referenced for the interested reader. Necessary formulas for computations are presented in the appendices. A summary table of some suitable reliability measures is presented.
1,318 citations
01 Jan 2009
TL;DR: Methods to evaluate reliability and validity depend on the research purpose, assumptions, and methodologies and may involve quantitative as well as qualitative assessments.
Abstract: Reliability and its antonym unreliability are related to the consistency with which observations can be measured and recorded. Validity depends on reliable observations but addresses the user confidence in or credibility of a study. Both notions are evaluated with respect to a relative notion of ‘truth’ that requires a specification of against what reference we are evaluating observations or conclusions. Methods to evaluate reliability and validity depend on the research purpose, assumptions, and methodologies and may involve quantitative as well as qualitative assessments.
1,159 citations