Topic
Intra-rater reliability
About: Intra-rater reliability is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 2073 publications have been published within this topic receiving 140968 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: In this article, the Laplace test and ROCOF curves are used for trend testing in the context of reliability/survival applications, and a practical reliability example is presented.
Abstract: Considers trend testing in the context of reliability/survival applications. Suggests that the very common tendency in reliability testing to fit lifetime distributions to reliability/maintenance data might occasionally be invalid. Details the appropriate methods to assess the validity, or otherwise, of such a procedure. More specifically, discusses ROCOF curves and the Laplace test for trend, and demonstrates their use by means of a practical, reliability example.
4 citations
TL;DR: Evaluating the reliability and reproducibility of measurements of shortening in midshaft clavicle fractures using any available imaging technique found no definite conclusions could be drawn.
Abstract: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of measurements of shortening in midshaft clavicle fractures (MSCF) using any available imaging technique. Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane) were searched. The 4-point-scale COSMIN checklist was used to evaluate the methodological quality of studies. Four studies on reliability of measurement of MSCF were identified. These studies were of fair and poor quality. The reported intrarater reliability varied between none to fair, and intrarater reliability was minimal. No definite conclusions could be drawn. In order to optimize future studies and the realization of comparable results, more research is necessary to identify a standardized method of imaging and measuring. Level of Evidence III.
4 citations
TL;DR: A moderate overall level of evidence exists for the use of US to reliably assess the HH position in symptomatic or asymptomatic subjects and limited research supports the methods used for palpation within a clinical setting.
4 citations
TL;DR: Wang et al. as mentioned in this paper analyzed the component reliability of the product by reliabilitysimulation based on physics failure theory, and discussed the product reliability by reliability functional simulation, which can accurately predict the reliability in the product development process by the proposed method.
4 citations
TL;DR: The final score and individual scoring criteria of the LESS have acceptable reliability with raters using the standardized scoring sheet and practitioners using only the Standardized scoring sheet should feel confident that the LLESS is a reliable tool.
Abstract: Context Dynamic movement-based screens, such as the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS), are becoming more widely used in research and practical settings. Currently, 3 studies have examined the reliability of the LESS. These studies have reported good interrater and intrarater reliability. However, all 3 studies involved raters, who were founders of the LESS. Therefore, it is unclear whether the reliability reported reflects that which would be observed with practitioners without such specialized and intimate knowledge of the screen and only using the standardized set of instructions. Objective To investigate the interrater and intrarater reliability of the final score and the individual scoring criteria of the LESS. Design Reliability protocol. Setting Controlled laboratory. Participants Two raters scored 30 male participants (age = 21.8 [3.9] y; height = 1.75 [0.46] m; mass = 75.5 [6.6] kg) involved in a variety of college sports. Main outcome measure Two raters using only the standardized scoring sheet assessed the interrater reliability of the total score and individual scoring criteria independently of each other. The principal author scored the videos again 6 weeks later for the intrarater reliability component of the study. Intervention Participants performed a drop box landing from a 30-cm box was recorded with a video camera from the front and side views. Results The intraclass coefficients interrater and intrarater reliability for the total scores were excellent (intraclass coefficients range = .95 and .96; SEM = 1.01 and 1.02). The individual scoring criteria of the LESS had between moderate and perfect agreement using kappa statistics (κ = .41-1.0). Conclusion The final score and individual scoring criteria of the LESS have acceptable reliability with raters using the standardized scoring sheet. Practitioners using only the standardized scoring sheet should feel confident that the LESS is a reliable tool.
4 citations