scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Intra-rater reliability

About: Intra-rater reliability is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 2073 publications have been published within this topic receiving 140968 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Evaluation of spinal range of motion measures in children using the Spinal Mouse demonstrates fair to high reliability.

89 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results support the interchangeable use of goniometry and digital inclinometer for measuring scaption and the 95% limits of agreement suggest that the difference between these two measurement instruments can be expected to vary by up to ±11 degrees.
Abstract: This study investigated the reliability and concurrent validity of active shoulder elevation in the scapular plane (scaption) using a digital inclinometer and goniometer. Two investigators used a goniometer and digital inclinometer to measure scaption on 30 asymptomatic participants in a blinded repeated measures design. Good reliability was present with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intrarater reliability of goniometry = 0.87, intrarater digital inclinometry = 0.88, interrater goniometry = 0.92, and interrater digital inclinometry = 0.89. The minimal detectable change (MDC95) for the interrater analysis indicated that a change equal to or greater than 8 degrees for goniometry and 9 degrees for inclinometry is required to be 95% certain that the change is not due to intertrial variability or measurement error. The concurrent validity between goniometry and digital inclinometry was excellent with an ICC value of 0.94 for both raters. The 95% limits of agreement suggest that the difference between these two measurement instruments can be expected to vary by up to ±11 degrees. The results support the interchangeable use of goniometry and digital inclinometer for measuring scaption. Clinicians and researchers should consider the MDC values presented when interpreting change during subsequent measurement sessions.

89 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Interrater reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale may be lower than desired for clinical use for muscles other than hamstrings and elbow flexors, and intrarater reliability may also be lowerthan desired for musclesother than the hamstrings.
Abstract: Purpose:The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a six-point scale used to assess spasticity. This study assessed interrater and intrarater reliability of the MAS for children with hypertonia.Methods:Five raters participated in this examination of interrater and intrarater reliability. The study include

89 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Reliability of the MAS for assessing plantarflexor spasticity in patients with traumatic brain injury was found to be minimally adequate to support its continued use, however, interrater reliability was less than that which has been reported for elbow flexors, and intrarater reliability findings were mixed.
Abstract: Although the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is commonly used to assess the severity of muscle spasticity for ankle plantarflexors, its reliability has only been established for elbow muscles. Interrater reliability, intrarater reliability and temporal (between-days) reliability were examined in this study. Also, interrater reliability for use of the scale with plantarflexors was compared with reported results from the measurement of elbow flexors. Thirty adult volunteers with traumatic brain injuries participated. There were 20 men and 10 women; the mean age was 28.3 years (SD = 10.8). Two physical therapists used the MAS to score the subjects independently. Measurements were repeated to yield multiple scores for intrarater reliability assessment. Twenty-one of the subjects returned individually on separate days to be measured again, so that temporal reliability could be assessed. Spearman's correlation coefficients were 0.73 for interrater reliability 0.74 and 0.55 for intrarater reliability, and 0.82 for temporal reliability. Overall, reliability of the MAS for assessing plantarflexor spasticity in patients with traumatic brain injury was found to be minimally adequate to support its continued use. However, interrater reliability was less than that which has been reported for elbow flexors, and intrarater reliability findings were mixed.

88 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The contention that some physical performance measures can be used to test individuals in the later stages of Alzheimer's disease given appropriate modification is supported.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Investigation of the effects of exercise on frail, institutionalized individuals with dementia has been impeded by concerns about the reliability of physical performance measures when used in this population. METHODS: The physical performance of 33 institutionalized subjects with Alzheimer's disease was measured during both the morning and afternoon of day 1 by rater 1 and during both the morning and afternoon of day 2, one week later, by rater 1 and rater 2. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to examine the inter- and intrarater reliability of "sit to stand," "25-foot walk," and "the distance walked in 6 minutes" and walking speed over 25 feet and for 6 minutes. An analysis of variance was performed to determine the components of variance for each test. RESULTS: ICCs for "distance walked in 6 minutes" ranged from .80 to .99 with 77% of the variance explained by inter-subject difference. The ICCs for "time to walk 25 feet" ranged from .57 to .97 with 25% of the variance explained by inter-subject differences. In contrast, the "sit to stand" measure produced ICCs ranging from -.07 to .85 with only 7% of the variance explained by inter-subject differences in this impaired population. CONCLUSION: Our results support the contention that some physical performance measures can be used to test individuals in the later stages of Alzheimer's disease given appropriate modification. Although subjects with Alzheimer's disease may have difficulty following commands and/or require physical assistance, this does not prohibit the reliable assessment of physical performance if measurements are made over longer (6-minute walk) rather than shorter periods (25-foot walk). Language: en

88 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Rehabilitation
46.2K papers, 776.3K citations
69% related
Ankle
30.4K papers, 687.4K citations
68% related
Systematic review
33.3K papers, 1.6M citations
68% related
Activities of daily living
18.2K papers, 592.8K citations
68% related
Validity
13.8K papers, 776K citations
67% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202342
202278
202186
202083
201986
201867