scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Katz centrality

About: Katz centrality is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 601 publications have been published within this topic receiving 77858 citations.


Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Tao Peng1, Delong Zhang1, Xiaoming Liu1, Shang Wang1, Wanli Zuo1 
28 Oct 2013
TL;DR: This paper presents a community mining algorithm and divides big co-authorship network into small communities, in which entities' relationship is closer, and mines central authors in community by three different centrality standards including closeness centrality, eigenvector centrality and a new proposed measure termed extensity degree centrality.
Abstract: Most researches on co-authorship network analyze the author's information globally according to the overall network topology structure, instead of analyzing the author's local network. Therefore, this paper presents a community mining algorithm and divides big co-authorship network into small communities, in which entities' relationship is closer. Then we mine central authors in community by three different centrality standards including closeness centrality, eigenvector centrality and a new proposed measure termed extensity degree centrality. We choose the SIGMOD data as datasets and measure the centrality from different views. And experiments in co-authorship network achieve many interesting results, which indicate our technique is efficient and feasible, and also have reference value for scientific evaluation.

3 citations

ReportDOI
TL;DR: It is found that a normal distribution well approximating most metrics is found, for large slightly dense networks, and that the ranges are centered at the expected mean and the endpoints are two (sample) standard deviations apart from the center.
Abstract: : Networks, and the nodes within them, are often characterized using a series of metrics. Illustrative graph level metrics are the characteristic path length and the clustering co-efficient. Illustrative node level metrics are degree centrality, betweenness centrality, closeness centrality, and eigenvector centrality. A key issue in using these metrics is how to interpret the values; e.g., is a degree centrality of .2 high? With normalized values, we know that these metrics go between 0 and 1, and while 0 is low and 1 is high, we don't have much other interpretive information. Here we ask, are these values different than what we would expect in a random graph. We report the distributions of these metrics against the behavior of random graphs and we present the 95% most probable range for each of these metrics. We find that a normal distribution well approximating most metrics, for large slightly dense networks, and that the ranges are centered at the expected mean and the endpoints are two (sample) standard deviations apart from the center.

3 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
01 Dec 2014
TL;DR: Dithering is applied to design a node centrality measure for weighted graphs that preserves robustness in the presence of noise while improving the behavior of stable betweenness.
Abstract: This paper applies dithering to design a node centrality measure for weighted graphs. The construction is an improvement on the stable betweenness centrality measure which, in turn, was introduced as a robust alternative to the well-known betweenness centrality. We interpret any given graph as the mean representation of a distribution of graphs and define the dithered centrality value as the expected centrality value across all graphs in the distribution. We show that the dithered stable betweenness centrality measure preserves robustness in the presence of noise while improving the behavior of stable betweenness. Numerical experiments demonstrate the advantages of dithering by comparing the performance of betweenness, stable betweenness and dithered stable betweenness centralities in terms of robustness to noise, dependence on the number and quality of alternative paths, and distribution of centrality values across the graph.

3 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: A following and followed directed network was established based on Sina individual microblog and the node centrality of the network was found, pointing out the important users and their roles in dissemination of information.
Abstract: A following and followed directed network was established based on Sina individual microblog.By analyzing social network centrality indicators applied to the microblog directed network,such as the node degree,closeness,betweenness and K-shell,the node centrality of the network was found.The results point out the important users and their roles in dissemination of information.Besides,the characteristics of the users on the microblog network were analyzed in order to reflect the personal interests and hobbies.The correlation between the social networks index and the degree of network was studied to reflect the relationship among the indicators.The results will help us to identify individual key nodes,and then analyze the information dissemination on individual microblog user network.

3 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: A Personal-Potential Influence (PPI) algorithm is proposed, which evaluates the weight of its k-shell, closeness centrality and betweenness centrality by considering the strength of relationship between nodes.
Abstract: In social networks, investigating node influence and influence maximization is an important issue and attracts great interest in the research community. In order to analyze its personal influence and potential influence, it proposes a Personal-Potential Influence(PPI)algorithm, which evaluates the weight of its k-shell, closeness centrality and betweenness centrality by considering the strength of relationship between nodes. The experimental results show that PPI has the higher accuracy in node influence and outperforms other algorithms.

3 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Social network
42.9K papers, 1.5M citations
70% related
Graph (abstract data type)
69.9K papers, 1.2M citations
67% related
Node (networking)
158.3K papers, 1.7M citations
65% related
Markov chain
51.9K papers, 1.3M citations
65% related
Server
79.5K papers, 1.4M citations
64% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202318
202232
202114
202013
201919
201824