Keratan sulfate

About: Keratan sulfate is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 1253 publications have been published within this topic receiving 57984 citations. The topic is also known as: keratan sulfate & KS.

Expression of glycosaminoglycan epitopes during zebrafish skeletogenesis

Abstract: Background: The zebrafish is an important developmental model. Surprisingly, there are few studies that describe the glycosaminoglycan composition of its extracellular matrix during skeletogenesis. Glycosaminoglycans on proteoglycans contribute to the material properties of musculo skeletal connective tissues, and are important in regulating signalling events during morphogenesis. Sulfation motifs within the chain structure of glycosaminoglycans on cell-associated and extracellular matrix proteoglycans allow them to bind and regulate the sequestration/presentation of bioactive signalling molecules important in musculo-skeletal development. Results: We describe the spatio-temporal expression of different glycosaminoglycan moieties during zebrafish skeletogenesis with antibodies recognising (1) native sulfation motifs within chondroitin and keratan sulfate chains, and (2) enzyme-generated neoepitope sequences within the chain structure of chondroitin sulfate (i.e., 0-, 4-, and 6-sulfated isoforms) and heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans. We show that all the glycosaminoglycan moieties investigated are expressed within the developing skeletal tissues of larval zebrafish. However, subtle changes in their patterns of spatio-temporal expression over the period examined suggest that their expression is tightly and dynamically controlled during development. Conclusions: The subtle differences observed in the domains of expression between different glycosaminoglycan moieties suggest differences in their functional roles during establishment of the primitive analogues of the skeleton. Developmental Dynamics 242:778–789, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Innervation of the chick cornea analyzed in vitro.

Abstract: Purpose. During the early stages (embryonic day 3 [E3]) of avian corneal development, nerve fibers extend from the trigeminal ganglion to the corneal limbus. On E11, these nerve fibers enter the cornea and extend through the secondary stroma to begin innervation of the epithelium on E13. This process of innervation is concomitant with the cornea's dehydration and transition from opacity to transparency ; thus, suggesting a link between innervation and the attainment of corneal function. This investigation attempts to ascertain whether the developing cornea can support its innervation in vitro and whether there is a possible developmental interrelationship between corneal innervation and dehydration, with the associated transition from opacity to transparency. Methods. Isolated corneas from either E8 or E14 chicks were co-cultured with E8 dorsal root ganglia. After 4 days of culture, innervation was visualized by silver staining and immunohistochemistry. Changes in corneal composition and organization associated with this innervation in vitro were analyzed by measuring changes in specific hydration, thickness and compaction, and incorporation of [ 35 S]sulfate into glycosaminoglycans during co-culture. Results. The E8 and E14 corneas support extensive innervation in vitro. Developing nerve fibers extend through the secondary stroma to innervate the epithelium. In vitro innervation of E8, but not E14, corneas was associated with a decrease in corneal specific hydration, whereas control corneas (without dorsal root ganglia) failed to show any such changes. E8 corneas also showed a significant increase in compaction when innervated in vitro. Corneal innervation in vitro did not significantly change the overall incorporation of [ 35 S]sulfate into glycosaminoglycans. Furthermore, incorporation of [ 35 S]sulfate into corneal sulfated glycosaminoglycans (sGAG) is not influenced by either the number of nerve fibers innervating the cornea or nerve growth factor (NGF). In addition, the distribution of staining of the corneal glycosaminoglycans, chondroitin sulfate and keratan sulfate, and peanut agglutinin-binding epitopes, suggests that these molecules are not associated with inhibition of axonal development. Conclusions. The in vitro system described here is a useful model to understand the process of corneal development. Co-culture has shown that corneal innervation promotes the process of dehydration, which is dependent on the age of the cornea. However, other functionally related refinements necessary for transparency-notably proteoglycan synthesis-may not be linked to innervation or NGF production. The authors conclude that the development of transparency is dependent on corneal innervation, though not exclusively, and that other controlling factors also are required.

Proton Conductivity of Glycosaminoglycans

Abstract: Proton (H+) conductivity is important in many natural phenomena including oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria and archea, uncoupling membrane potentials by the antibiotic Gramicidin, and proton actuated bioluminescence in dinoflagellate. In all of these phenomena, the conduction of H+ occurs along chains of hydrogen bonds between water and hydrophilic residues. These chains of hydrogen bonds are also present in many hydrated biopolymers and macromolecule including collagen, keratin, chitosan, and various proteins such as reflectin. All of these materials are also proton conductors. Recently, our group has discovered that the jelly found in the Ampullae of Lorenzini- shark’s electrosensing organs- is the highest naturally occurring proton conducting substance. The jelly has a complex composition, but we attributed the conductivity to the glycosaminoglycan keratan sulfate (KS). Here, we have measured the proton conductivity of hydrated keratan sulfate using PdHx contacts to be 0.50 ± 0.11 mS cm -1- consistent to that of Ampullae of Lorenzini jelly, 2 ± 1 mS cm -1. Proton conductivity, albeit with lower values, is also shared by other glycosaminoglycans with similar chemical structures including dermatan sulfate, chondroitin sulfate A, heparan sulfate, and hyaluronic acid. This observation confirms the structure property relationship between proton conductivity and the chemical structure of biopolymers.