Keystroke dynamics

About: Keystroke dynamics is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 1116 publications have been published within this topic receiving 23504 citations.

Keystroke dynamics as a biometric for authentication

Abstract: More than ever before the Internet is changing computing as we know it. Global access to information and resources is becoming an integral part of nearly every aspect of our lives. Unfortunately, with this global network access comes increased chances of malicious attack and intrusion. In an effort to confront the new threats unveiled by the networking revolution of the past few years reliable, rapid, and unintrusive means for automatically recognizing the identity of individuals are now being sought. In this paper we examine an emerging non-static biometric technique that aims to identify users based on analyzing habitual rhythm patterns in the way they type.

Identity authentication based on keystroke latencies

Abstract: The variables that help make a handwritten signature a unique human identifier also provide a unique digital signature in the form of a stream of latency periods between keystrokes. This article describes a method of verifying the identity of a user based on such a digital signature, and reports results from trial usage of the system.

Authentication via keystroke dynamics

Abstract: In an effort to confront the challenges brought forward by the networking revolution of the past few years, we present improved techniques for authorized access to computer system resources and data. More than ever before, the Internet is changing computing as we know it. The possibilities of this global network seem limitless; unfortunately, with this global access comes increased chances of malicious attack and intrusion. Alternatives to traditional access control measures are in high demand. In what follows we present one such alternative: computer access via keystroke dynamics. A database of 42 profiles was constructed based on keystroke patterns gathered from various users performing structured and unstructured tasks. We study the performance of a system for recognition of these users, and present a toolkit for analyzing system performance under varying criteria.

User authentication through keystroke dynamics

Abstract: Unlike other access control systems based on biometric features, keystroke analysis has not led to techniques providing an acceptable level of accuracy. The reason is probably the intrinsic variability of typing dynamics, versus other---very stable---biometric characteristics, such as face or fingerprint patterns. In this paper we present an original measure for keystroke dynamics that limits the instability of this biometric feature. We have tested our approach on 154 individuals, achieving a False Alarm Rate of about 4p and an Impostor Pass Rate of less than 0.01p. This performance is reached using the same sampling text for all the individuals, allowing typing errors, without any specific tailoring of the authentication system with respect to the available set of typing samples and users, and collecting the samples over a 28.8-Kbaud remote modem connection.

Comparing anomaly-detection algorithms for keystroke dynamics

Abstract: Keystroke dynamics-the analysis of typing rhythms to discriminate among users-has been proposed for detecting impostors (i.e., both insiders and external attackers). Since many anomaly-detection algorithms have been proposed for this task, it is natural to ask which are the top performers (e.g., to identify promising research directions). Unfortunately, we cannot conduct a sound comparison of detectors using the results in the literature because evaluation conditions are inconsistent across studies. Our objective is to collect a keystroke-dynamics data set, to develop a repeatable evaluation procedure, and to measure the performance of a range of detectors so that the results can be compared soundly. We collected data from 51 subjects typing 400 passwords each, and we implemented and evaluated 14 detectors from the keystroke-dynamics and pattern-recognition literature. The three top-performing detectors achieve equal-error rates between 9.6% and 10.2%. The results-along with the shared data and evaluation methodology-constitute a benchmark for comparing detectors and measuring progress.