Topic
Lepidoptera genitalia
About: Lepidoptera genitalia is a(n) research topic. Over the lifetime, 10114 publication(s) have been published within this topic receiving 78876 citation(s). The topic is also known as: Uncus.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
01 Jan 1989
TL;DR: Studies on the biochemical mechanisms of toxicity suggest that B. thuringiensis crystal proteins induce the formation of pores in membranes of susceptible cells, and these approaches are potentially powerful strategies for the protection of agriculturally important crops against insect damage.
Abstract: characterized by its ability to produce crystalline inclusions during spor-ulation. TIhese inclusions consist of proteins exhibiting a highly specific insecticidal activity (reviewed in references 4 and 97). Many B. thuriuigiensis strains with different insect host spectra have been identified (9). TIhey ar-e classified into different serotypes or subspecies based on their flagellar antigens. Most strains are active against larvae of certain members of the Lepidoptera, but some show toxicity against dipterian (reviewed in refer-ence 22) or coleopteran (53) species. For several cryst.al-producing strains.
1,890 citations
645 citations
Book•
01 Jan 1992
TL;DR: The adult head - feeding and sensation the adult thorax - astudy in function and effect the adult abdomen - segmentation and the genitalia juvenile stages communication - sound, hearing and scent environmental and ecological importance of Lepidoptera.
Abstract: Part 1 Form and function: the adult head - feeding and sensation the adult thorax - astudy in function and effect the adult abdomen - segmentation and the genitalia juvenile stages communication - sound, hearing and scent environmental and ecological importance of Lepidoptera. Part 3 A guide to the major taxa: introduction to the Lepidopteran classification primitive moths early Heteroneura lower Ditrysia higher Ditrysia - macrolepidopterans.
587 citations
TL;DR: By comparing pairs of related clades of insects that differ in mating system, this work assesses how the opportunity for postmating sexual selection affects the rate of divergent evolution of male genitalia.
Abstract: Rapid divergent evolution of male genitalia is one of the most general evolutionary trends in animals with internal fertilization; the shapes of genital traits often provide the only reliable characters for species identification1. Yet the evolutionary processes responsible for this pattern remain obscure. The long-standing lock-and-key hypothesis, still popular among taxonomists, suggests that genitalia evolve by pre-insemination hybridization avoidance; that is, hybrid inferiority drives the evolution of male genitalia with a proper mechanical fit to female genitalia. The sexual selection hypothesis2,3, in contrast, proposes that divergent evolution of genitalia is the result of sexual selection, brought about by variation in postinsemination paternity success among males. Here, by comparing pairs of related clades of insects that differ in mating system, I assess how the opportunity for postmating sexual selection affects the rate of divergent evolution of male genitalia. Genital evolution is more than twice as divergent in groups in which females mate several times than in groups in which females mate only once. This pattern is not found for other morphological traits. These findings provide strong empirical evidence in favour of a postmating sexual selection mechanism of genital evolution.
476 citations
Naturalis1, University of Helsinki2, American Museum of Natural History3, University of Copenhagen4, Institut national de la recherche agronomique5, Centre national de la recherche scientifique6, University of Maryland, College Park7, University of Oulu8, University of Turku9, National Sun Yat-sen University10, National Museum of Natural History11, University of Valencia12, Smithsonian Institution13, Sam Houston State University14, Royal Museum for Central Africa15, California Department of Food and Agriculture16, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research17, Florida Museum of Natural History18, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada19, National University of San Marcos20, Mississippi State University21, University of New Orleans22, Canadian Food Inspection Agency23
TL;DR: This dissertation aims to provide a history of web exceptionalism from 1989 to 2002, a period chosen in order to explore its roots as well as specific cases up to and including the year in which descriptions of “Web 2.0” began to circulate.
Abstract: van Nieukerken, Erik J.; Kaila, Lauri; Kitching, Ian J.; Kristensen, Niels Peder; Lees, David C.; Minet, Joël; Mitter, Charles; Mutanen, Marko; Regier, Jerome C.; Simonsen, Thomas J.; Wahlberg, Niklas; Yen, Shen-Horn; Zahiri, Reza; Adamski, David; Baixeras, Joaquin; Bartsch, Daniel; Bengtsson, Bengt Å.; Brown, John W.; Bucheli, Sibyl Rae; Davis, Donald R.; de Prins, Jurate; de Prins, Willy; Epstein, Marc E.; Gentili-Poole, Patricia; Gielis, Caes; Hättenschwiler, Peter; Hausmann, Axel; Holloway, Jeremy D.; Kallies, Axel; Karsholt, Ole; Kawahara, Akito Y.; Koster, Sjaak; Kozlov, Mikhail; Lafontaine, J. Donald; Lamas, Gerardo; Landry, JeanFrançois; Lee, Sangmi; Nuss, Matthias; Park, Kyu-Tek; Penz, Carla; Rota, Jadranka; Schintlmeister, Alexander; Schmidt, B. Christian; Sohn, Jae-Cheon; Solis, M. Alma; Tarmann, Gerhard M.; Warren, Andrew D.; Weller, Susan; Yakovlev, Roman V.; Zolotuhin, Vadim V.; Zwick, Andreas
398 citations