scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Linear discriminant analysis

About: Linear discriminant analysis is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 18361 publications have been published within this topic receiving 603195 citations. The topic is also known as: Linear discriminant analysis & LDA.


Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
15 Sep 2008
TL;DR: Cluster analysis as mentioned in this paper is the formal study of algorithms and methods for grouping objects according to measured or perceived intrinsic characteristics, which is one of the most fundamental modes of understanding and learning.
Abstract: The practice of classifying objects according to perceived similarities is the basis for much of science. Organizing data into sensible groupings is one of the most fundamental modes of understanding and learning. As an example, a common scheme of scientific classification puts organisms in to taxonomic ranks: domain, kingdom, phylum, class, etc.). Cluster analysis is the formal study of algorithms and methods for grouping objects according to measured or perceived intrinsic characteristics. Cluster analysis does not use category labels that tag objects with prior identifiers, i.e., class labels. The absence of category information distinguishes cluster analysis (unsupervised learning) from discriminant analysis (supervised learning). The objective of cluster analysis is to simply find a convenient and valid organization of the data, not to establish rules for separating future data into categories.

4,255 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work reviews a general methodology for model-based clustering that provides a principled statistical approach to important practical questions that arise in cluster analysis, such as how many clusters are there, which clustering method should be used, and how should outliers be handled.
Abstract: Cluster analysis is the automated search for groups of related observations in a dataset. Most clustering done in practice is based largely on heuristic but intuitively reasonable procedures, and most clustering methods available in commercial software are also of this type. However, there is little systematic guidance associated with these methods for solving important practical questions that arise in cluster analysis, such as how many clusters are there, which clustering method should be used, and how should outliers be handled. We review a general methodology for model-based clustering that provides a principled statistical approach to these issues. We also show that this can be useful for other problems in multivariate analysis, such as discriminant analysis and multivariate density estimation. We give examples from medical diagnosis, minefield detection, cluster recovery from noisy data, and spatial density estimation. Finally, we mention limitations of the methodology and discuss recent development...

4,123 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An extension of the previous work which proposes a new speaker representation for speaker verification, a new low-dimensional speaker- and channel-dependent space is defined using a simple factor analysis, named the total variability space because it models both speaker and channel variabilities.
Abstract: This paper presents an extension of our previous work which proposes a new speaker representation for speaker verification. In this modeling, a new low-dimensional speaker- and channel-dependent space is defined using a simple factor analysis. This space is named the total variability space because it models both speaker and channel variabilities. Two speaker verification systems are proposed which use this new representation. The first system is a support vector machine-based system that uses the cosine kernel to estimate the similarity between the input data. The second system directly uses the cosine similarity as the final decision score. We tested three channel compensation techniques in the total variability space, which are within-class covariance normalization (WCCN), linear discriminate analysis (LDA), and nuisance attribute projection (NAP). We found that the best results are obtained when LDA is followed by WCCN. We achieved an equal error rate (EER) of 1.12% and MinDCF of 0.0094 using the cosine distance scoring on the male English trials of the core condition of the NIST 2008 Speaker Recognition Evaluation dataset. We also obtained 4% absolute EER improvement for both-gender trials on the 10 s-10 s condition compared to the classical joint factor analysis scoring.

3,526 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Experimental results suggest that the proposed Laplacianface approach provides a better representation and achieves lower error rates in face recognition.
Abstract: We propose an appearance-based face recognition method called the Laplacianface approach. By using locality preserving projections (LPP), the face images are mapped into a face subspace for analysis. Different from principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) which effectively see only the Euclidean structure of face space, LPP finds an embedding that preserves local information, and obtains a face subspace that best detects the essential face manifold structure. The Laplacianfaces are the optimal linear approximations to the eigenfunctions of the Laplace Beltrami operator on the face manifold. In this way, the unwanted variations resulting from changes in lighting, facial expression, and pose may be eliminated or reduced. Theoretical analysis shows that PCA, LDA, and LPP can be obtained from different graph models. We compare the proposed Laplacianface approach with Eigenface and Fisherface methods on three different face data sets. Experimental results suggest that the proposed Laplacianface approach provides a better representation and achieves lower error rates in face recognition.

3,314 citations

Book
01 Aug 1980

3,180 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Regression analysis
31K papers, 1.7M citations
85% related
Artificial neural network
207K papers, 4.5M citations
80% related
Feature extraction
111.8K papers, 2.1M citations
80% related
Cluster analysis
146.5K papers, 2.9M citations
79% related
Image segmentation
79.6K papers, 1.8M citations
79% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20251
20242
2023756
20221,711
2021678
2020815