scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Mammography

About: Mammography is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 20643 publications have been published within this topic receiving 513679 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Initial clinical experience has shown the ability of CEDM to map the distribution of neovasculature induced by cancer using mammography and a superiority of MX+CEDM, either for the assessment of the probability of malignancy than for BIRADS assessment comparing to MX alone.

149 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
15 May 2004-Cancer
TL;DR: There is no consensus regarding how frequently BRCA mutation carriers should be screened for malignancies using breast imaging techniques, but an interval malignancy found during the period between annual screening mammography scans indicates that themalignancy either went undetected by the last breast imaging scan or developed during the interval since that last scan.
Abstract: BACKGROUND At present, there is no consensus regarding how frequently BRCA mutation carriers should be screened for malignancies using breast imaging techniques. An interval malignancy is defined as a malignancy that becomes evident during the period between annual screening mammography scans; the finding of such a malignancy indicates that the malignancy either went undetected by the last breast imaging scan or developed during the interval since that last scan. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of all BRCA mutation carriers who were followed by the genetic counselor at the Columbia-Presbyterian Comprehensive Breast Center (New York, NY) between September 1995 and September 2002. RESULTS Thirteen BRCA mutation carriers elected to undergo close surveillance and thus were followed at our institution. Three of these 13 patients (23%) did not develop breast carcinoma, 4 (31%) developed breast carcinoma that was detected at the time of annual screening, and 6 (46%) developed palpable interval malignancies in less than 12 months. Among the six patients who developed interval malignancies, the mean time between the last screening mammogram and disease presentation was 5.1 months (range, 2–9 months); the average tumor size in this patient subgroup was 1.7 cm (range, 0.8–3 cm). Two of these six patients had ductal carcinoma in situ, whereas the remaining four had invasive breast carcinoma; three patients had positive lymph nodes at presentation. All six patients who developed interval disease exhibited dense breast tissue on the previous mammogram. Focused breast ultrasonography was able to identify the tumor mass in 3 of 4 patients (75%). CONCLUSIONS Nearly half of all BRCA-positive women who chose to undergo close surveillance in the current study developed malignant disease less than a year after exhibiting normal findings on screening mammography. Half of these interval malignancies were positive for lymph node involvement. These results suggest that strong consideration should be given to screening BRCA-positive women at more frequent intervals and to using additional imaging techniques, such as breast ultrasonography and/or breast magnetic resonance imaging, as a part of this screening. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.

149 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It appears that the primary imaging tool for breast cancer screening in the next decade will be high-resolution, high-contrast, anatomical x-ray imaging with or without depth information, and there is a trend towards multi-modality systems that combine anatomic with physiologic information.
Abstract: Breast imaging is largely indicated for detection, diagnosis, and clinical management of breast cancer and for evaluation of the integrity of breast implants. In this work, a prospective view of techniques for breast cancer detection and diagnosis is provided based on an assessment of current trends. The potential role of emerging techniques that are under various stages of research and development is also addressed. It appears that the primary imaging tool for breast cancer screening in the next decade will be high-resolution, high-contrast, anatomical x-ray imaging with or without depth information. MRI and ultrasonography will have an increasingly important adjunctive role for imaging high-risk patients and women with dense breasts. Pilot studies with dedicated breast CT have demonstrated high-resolution three-dimensional imaging capabilities, but several technological barriers must be overcome before clinical adoption. Radionuclide based imaging techniques and x-ray imaging with intravenously injected contrast offer substantial potential as a diagnostic tools and for evaluation of suspicious lesions. Developing optical and electromagnetic imaging techniques hold significant potential for physiologic information and they are likely to be of most value when integrated with or adjunctively used with techniques that provide anatomic information. Experimental studies with breast specimens suggest that phase-sensitive x-ray imaging techniques can provide edge enhancement and contrast improvement but more research is needed to evaluate their potential role in clinical breast imaging. From the technological perspective, in addition to improvements within each modality, there is likely to be a trend towards multi-modality systems that combine anatomic with physiologic information. We are also likely to transition from a standardized screening, where all women undergo the same imaging exam (mammography), to selection of a screening modality or modalities based an individual-risk or other classification.

149 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: M Mammographically dense breast tissue differs from most other breast cancer risk factors in the strength of the associated relative and attributable risks for breast cancer, and because it can be changed by hormonal and dietary interventions.
Abstract: Variations between individuals in the radiographic appearance, or mammographic pattern, of the female breast arise because of differences in the relative amounts and X-ray attenuation characteristics of fat and connective and epithelial tissue. Studies using quantitative methods of assessment have consistently shown these variations to be strongly related to risk of breast cancer. Individuals with extensive areas of radiologically dense breast tissue on the mammogram have been found to have a risk of breast cancer that is four to six times higher than women with little or no density. In this paper, we propose a model for the relationship of mammographic densities to risk of breast cancer. We propose that the risk of breast cancer associated with mammographically dense breast tissue is due to the combined effects of two processes: cell proliferation (mitogenesis), induced by growth factors and sex hormones and influenced by reproductive risk factors for breast cancer; and damage to the DNA of dividing cells (mutagenesis) by mutagens generated by lipid peroxidation. We review the evidence that each of these processes is associated with mammographic densities and propose further work that we believe should be done to clarify these relationships.

149 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A dual-energy radiography technique based on a tissue cancellation algorithm has been developed for mammography, with the aim of maximizing the low intrinsic contrast of pathologic tissues while being able to minimize or cancel the contrast between glandular and fat tissues.
Abstract: Dual-energy radiography has not evolved into a routine clinical examination yet due to intrinsic limitations of both dual-kVp imaging and single-exposure imaging with conventional x-ray sources. The recent introduction of novel quasi-monochromatic x-ray sources and detectors could lead to interesting improvements, especially in mammography where the complex structure of healthy tissues often masks the detectability of lesions. A dual-energy radiography technique based on a tissue cancellation algorithm has been developed for mammography, with the aim of maximizing the low intrinsic contrast of pathologic tissues while being able to minimize or cancel the contrast between glandular and fat tissues. Several images of a plastic test object containing various tissue equivalent inserts were acquired in the energy range 17-36 keV using a quasi-monochromatic x-ray source and a scintillator-coated CCD detector. Images acquired at high and low energies were nonlinearly combined to generate two energy-independent basis images. Suitable linear combinations of these two basis images result in the elimination of the contrast of a given material with respect to another. This makes it possible to selectively cancel certain details in the processed image.

148 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Breast cancer
214.3K papers, 6.4M citations
86% related
Radiation therapy
76.3K papers, 2M citations
83% related
Cancer
339.6K papers, 10.9M citations
80% related
Magnetic resonance imaging
61K papers, 1.5M citations
80% related
Carcinoma
78.2K papers, 2.2M citations
79% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023970
20221,954
2021847
2020852
2019865
2018852