scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Mammography

About: Mammography is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 20643 publications have been published within this topic receiving 513679 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The basics of this technique are reviewed, how to perform the examination, image interpretation, and artifacts, and a primer will highlight the technique and point out common pitfalls.
Abstract: Breast elastography is a new sonographic technique that provides additional characterization information on breast lesions over conventional sonography and mammography. This technique provides information on the strain or hardness of a lesion, similar to a clinical palpation examination. Two techniques are now available for clinical use: strain (compression-based elastography) and shear wave elastography. Initial evaluation of these techniques in clinical trials suggests that they may substantially improve the characterization of breast lesions as benign or malignant. This improvement may substantially reduce the number of benign biopsies performed. Elastography can be performed by several methods and is now available from several manufactures. This article reviews the basics of this technique, how to perform the examination, image interpretation, and artifacts. Although easy to perform, technique is critical to obtain adequate images for interpretation. This primer will highlight the technique and point out common pitfalls.

202 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Magnetic resonance imaging appears to be indispensable in breast-conserving surgery to minimize local recurrence and can diagnose breast cancer as accurately as ultrasonography and more accurately than mammography.
Abstract: Background The widespread use of mammographic screening has led to increased detection of small tumors that are often difficult to diagnose with conventional imaging modalities such as mammography and ultrasonography. Intraductal spread of breast cancer, a principle risk factor for local recurrence, is also difficult to diagnose with mammography and ultrasonography. We investigated the clinical usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging of the breast in the therapy of breast cancer and we compared it with mammography and ultrasonography. Study design A total of 183 patients with primary breast cancer underwent surgery at our institute between September 1, 1999, and November 30, 2002. They were examined preoperatively with magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasonography. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation included contrast-enhanced dynamic studies using IV injection of gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid. Results Detection rates of breast cancers by magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasonography were 93.7%, 84.6%, and 97.3%, respectively (magnetic resonance imaging versus mammography, p Conclusions Magnetic resonance imaging can diagnose breast cancer as accurately as ultrasonography and more accurately than mammography. Patterns of time-intensity curves correlated with tumor histology. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging can detect intraductal spread more accurately than the other two methods. Magnetic resonance imaging appears to be indispensable in breast-conserving surgery to minimize local recurrence.

202 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Double reading of 2D + 3D significantly improves the cancer detection rate in mammography screening and significantly reduced false-positive interpretations in tomosynthesis-based examinations.
Abstract: To compare double readings when interpreting full field digital mammography (2D) and tomosynthesis (3D) during mammographic screening. A prospective, Ethical Committee approved screening study is underway. During the first year 12,621 consenting women underwent both 2D and 3D imaging. Each examination was independently interpreted by four radiologists under four reading modes: Arm A—2D; Arm B—2D + CAD; Arm C—2D + 3D; Arm D—synthesised 2D + 3D. Examinations with a positive score by at least one reader were discussed at an arbitration meeting before a final management decision. Paired double reading of 2D (Arm A + B) and 2D + 3D (Arm C + D) were analysed. Performance measures were compared using generalised linear mixed models, accounting for inter-reader performance heterogeneity (P < 0.05). Pre-arbitration false-positive scores were 10.3 % (1,286/12,501) and 8.5 % (1,057/12,501) for 2D and 2D + 3D, respectively (P < 0.001). Recall rates were 2.9 % (365/12,621) and 3.7 % (463/12,621), respectively (P = 0.005). Cancer detection was 7.1 (90/12,621) and 9.4 (119/12,621) per 1,000 examinations, respectively (30 % increase, P < 0.001); positive predictive values (detected cancer patients per 100 recalls) were 24.7 % and 25.5 %, respectively (P = 0.97). Using 2D + 3D, double-reading radiologists detected 27 additional invasive cancers (P < 0.001). Double reading of 2D + 3D significantly improves the cancer detection rate in mammography screening. • Tomosynthesis-based screening was successfully implemented in a large prospective screening trial. • Double reading of tomosynthesis-based examinations significantly reduced false-positive interpretations. • Double reading of tomosynthesis significantly increased the detection of invasive cancers.

202 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is suggested that mammography with synchrotron radiation can be used to clarify cases of questionable or suspicious breast abnormalities identified at DM and ultrasonography.
Abstract: Mammography with synchrotron radiation facilitates the potential for increased ability to diagnose true-negative imaging findings.

201 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results of this study show that cone-beam breast CT can be used to image the entire breast from chest wall to nipple with sufficient spatial and contrast resolution for detection of masses and calcifications at a radiation dose within the range of that of conventional mammography.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE. The primary objectives of this pilot study were to evaluate the radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality of cone-beam breast CT compared with a conventional mammographic examination. Image quality analysis was focused on the concordance of cone-beam breast CT with conventional mammography in terms of mammographic findings.SUBJECTS AND METHODS. This prospective study was performed from July 2006 through August 2008. Twenty-three women were enrolled who met the inclusion criteria, which were age 40 years or older with final BI-RADS assessment category 1 or 2 lesions on conventional mammograms within the previous 6 months. The breasts were imaged with a flat-panel detector-based cone-beam CT system, and the images were reviewed with a 3D visualization system. Cone-beam breast CT image data sets and the corresponding mammograms were reviewed by three qualified mammographers. The parameters assessed and compared in this pilot study were radiation dose, breast tissue coverage, and image qua...

200 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Breast cancer
214.3K papers, 6.4M citations
86% related
Radiation therapy
76.3K papers, 2M citations
83% related
Cancer
339.6K papers, 10.9M citations
80% related
Magnetic resonance imaging
61K papers, 1.5M citations
80% related
Carcinoma
78.2K papers, 2.2M citations
79% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023970
20221,954
2021847
2020852
2019865
2018852