scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Markov random field

About: Markov random field is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 5669 publications have been published within this topic receiving 179568 citations. The topic is also known as: MRF.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that the use of a contextual classifier or an existing map of the area can have larger influence on the classification accuracy than using data from an additional sensor.
Abstract: The use of a Markov random field model for multisource classification for map revision applications is investigated. A statistical model is presented, in which data from several remote sensing sensors is merged with spatial contextual information and a previous labeling of the scene from an existing thematic map to reach a consensus classification. The method is tested on two data sets for forest classification, and the classification performance is studied in terms of the effect of using remote sensing data from different sensors, the effect of spatial context, and the effect of using map data from previous surveys in the classification. It is shown that the use of a contextual classifier or an existing map of the area can have larger influence on the classification accuracy than using data from an additional sensor.

64 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A gradient domain image fusion framework based on the Markov Random Field (MRF) fusion model that is able to better fuse the multi-sensor images and produces high-quality fusion results compared with the other state-of-the-art methods.

64 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An analysis of three algorithms based on convex relaxations and it is proved that despite the flexibility in the form of the constraints/objective function offered by QP and SOCP, the LP-S relaxation strictly dominates and provides a better approximation than QP-RL and SOCp-MS.
Abstract: The problem of obtaining the maximum a posteriori estimate of a general discrete Markov random field (i.e., a Markov random field defined using a discrete set of labels) is known to be NP-hard. However, due to its central importance in many applications, several approximation algorithms have been proposed in the literature. In this paper, we present an analysis of three such algorithms based on convex relaxations: (i) LP-S: the linear programming (LP) relaxation proposed by Schlesinger (1976) for a special case and independently in Chekuri et al. (2001), Koster et al. (1998), and Wainwright et al. (2005) for the general case; (ii) QP-RL: the quadratic programming (QP) relaxation of Ravikumar and Lafferty (2006); and (iii) SOCP-MS: the second order cone programming (SOCP) relaxation first proposed by Muramatsu and Suzuki (2003) for two label problems and later extended by Kumar et al. (2006) for a general label set. We show that the SOCP-MS and the QP-RL relaxations are equivalent. Furthermore, we prove that despite the flexibility in the form of the constraints/objective function offered by QP and SOCP, the LP-S relaxation strictly dominates (i.e., provides a better approximation than) QP-RL and SOCP-MS. We generalize these results by defining a large class of SOCP (and equivalent QP) relaxations which is dominated by the LP-S relaxation. Based on these results we propose some novel SOCP relaxations which define constraints using random variables that form cycles or cliques in the graphical model representation of the random field. Using some examples we show that the new SOCP relaxations strictly dominate the previous approaches.

64 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In real data applications, in addition to identifying markers and improving prediction accuracy, this work shows how the integration of existing biological knowledge into the prior model results in an increased ability to identify genes with strong discriminatory power and also aids the interpretation of the results.
Abstract: Motivation: Discriminant analysis is an effective tool for the classification of experimental units into groups. Here, we consider the typical problem of classifying subjects according to phenotypes via gene expression data and propose a method that incorporates variable selection into the inferential procedure, for the identification of the important biomarkers. To achieve this goal, we build upon a conjugate normal discriminant model, both linear and quadratic, and include a stochastic search variable selection procedure via an MCMC algorithm. Furthermore, we incorporate into the model prior information on the relationships among the genes as described by a gene–gene network. We use a Markov random field (MRF) prior to map the network connections among genes. Our prior model assumes that neighboring genes in the network are more likely to have a joint effect on the relevant biological processes. Results: We use simulated data to assess performances of our method. In particular, we compare the MRF prior to a situation where independent Bernoulli priors are chosen for the individual predictors. We also illustrate the method on benchmark datasets for gene expression. Our simulation studies show that employing the MRF prior improves on selection accuracy. In real data applications, in addition to identifying markers and improving prediction accuracy, we show how the integration of existing biological knowledge into the prior model results in an increased ability to identify genes with strong discriminatory power and also aids the interpretation of the results. Contact: [email protected]

64 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper focused on non-purposive grouping (NPG), which is built on general expectations of a perceptually desirable segmentation as opposed to any object specific models, such that the grouping algorithm is applicable to any image understanding application.

64 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Image segmentation
79.6K papers, 1.8M citations
94% related
Convolutional neural network
74.7K papers, 2M citations
93% related
Feature extraction
111.8K papers, 2.1M citations
92% related
Image processing
229.9K papers, 3.5M citations
91% related
Deep learning
79.8K papers, 2.1M citations
91% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20241
202330
2022128
202196
2020173
2019204