scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Mass screening

About: Mass screening is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 34508 publications have been published within this topic receiving 1365148 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In many countries, centralization of vascular surgical services has largely been driven by the improved outcomes of elective aneurysm surgery in specialized centers, the widespread adoption of endovascular techniques, and the introduction of screening programs.
Abstract: Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are found in up to 8% of men aged >65 years, yet usually remain asymptomatic until they rupture. Rupture of an AAA and its associated catastrophic physiological insult carries overall mortality in excess of 80%, and 2% of all deaths are AAA-related. Pathologically, AAAs are associated with inflammation, smooth muscle cell apoptosis, and matrix degradation. Once thought to be a consequence of advanced atherosclerosis, accruing evidence indicates that AAAs are a focal representation of a systemic disease of the vasculature. Risk factors for AAAs include increasing age, male sex, smoking, and low HDL-cholesterol levels. Familial associations exist and although susceptibility genes have been described on the basis of candidate-gene studies, robust genetic studies have failed to discover causative gene mutations. The surgical management of AAAs has been revolutionized by minimally invasive endovascular repair. Ongoing randomized trials will establish whether endovascular repair confers a survival advantage over open surgery for patients with a ruptured AAA. In many countries, centralization of vascular surgical services has largely been driven by the improved outcomes of elective aneurysm surgery in specialized centers, the widespread adoption of endovascular techniques, and the introduction of screening programs.

644 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
06 Oct 1978-JAMA
TL;DR: This study confirms, in the largest group surveyed to date, similar findings in previous cross-sectional surveys, and is consistent with data from longitudinal and intervention studies on the importance of overweight in relation to hypertension.
Abstract: In the nationwide Community Hypertension Evaluation Clinic screening of more than 1 million people, the group classifying itself as overweight had prevalence rates of hypertension 50% to 300% higher than other screenees. Frequency of hypertension in overweight persons aged 20 to 39 years was double that of normal weight and triple that of underweight persons. Among those aged 40 to 64 years, the overweight group had a 50% higher hypertension prevalence rate than the normal-weight group and 100% higher than the underweight group. With each higher degree of blood pressure elevation, relative frequency of hypertension with overweight was larger. Thus this study confirms, in the largest group surveyed to date, similar findings in previous cross-sectional surveys. It is also consistent with data from longitudinal and intervention studies on the importance of overweight in relation to hypertension. ( JAMA 240:1607-1610, 1978)

643 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Based on the available molecular, clinical and epidemiologic data, a subset of HPVs are unequivocally the etiologic agents for cervical cancers and their precursors and caution in clinical implementation of HPV testing is warranted.
Abstract: ISSUES Cervical squamous cell carcinomas, adenocarcinomas and their precursors are caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV). Although HPV appears to be essential to the transformation of these epithelial cells, it is not sufficient, and a variety of cofactors and molecular events must take place between when an HPV infection occurs and a cervical cancer or its precursor develops. This review examines the data supporting these contentions, briefly outlines the molecular events that occur, considers the epidemiology and natural history of the disease, and details the implications of using HPV detection and typing in both clinical management and population-based screening programs. CONSENSUS POSITION 1. Based on the available molecular, clinical and epidemiologic data, a subset of HPVs are unequivocally the etiologic agents for cervical cancers and their precursors. 2. Different mucosotropic HPVs have varying neoplastic potential. However, the great majority of cervical HPVs have oncogenic potential. Since oncogenic HPV-induced epithelial transformation to a high grade lesion or cancer is rare relative to the rate of infection, the term high risk is discouraged. 3. HPV's interaction with host cells has two principal biologic consequences: a) All anogenital HPVs induce low grade squamous lesions, which are the morphologic correlate of a productive infection. b) Rarely, HPVs induce a proliferative epithelial phenotype that pathologists recognize as a high grade lesion and that is the proximate cytohistologic precursor of invasive cervical carcinoma. 4. HPV biology and issues of practical clinical management should be reflected in the classification systems used for cytologic and histologic diagnosis. ONGOING ISSUES The molecular identification of HPVs (HPV testing) potentially may be very useful for primary screening or secondary triage of patients with certain lesions. However, the technology available to the practicing clinician is still evolving. Optimization of type spectrum, sensitivity, specificity and ease of use is under development. Data regarding these factors as well as a clear cost benefit analysis are sparse or pending in several large trials. Until such data are available, caution in clinical implementation of HPV testing is warranted.

636 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Levels of HDL-C and non-HDL-C at baseline were significant and strong predictors of CVD death in both sexes, and LDL-C level was a somewhat weaker predictor ofCVDdeath in both.
Abstract: Background: Non‐high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non‐HDL-C) contains all known and potential atherogenic lipid particles. Therefore, non‐HDL-C level may be as good a potential predictor of risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Objectives: Todeterminewhethernon‐HDL-Clevelcould be useful in predicting CVD mortality and to compare the predictive value of non‐HDL-C and LDL-C levels. Methods: Data are from the Lipid Research Clinics Program Follow-up Study, a mortality study with baseline data gathered from 1972 through 1976, and mortality ascertained through 1995. A total of 2406 men and 2056 women aged 40 to 64 years at entry were observed for an average of 19 years, with CVD death as the main outcome measure. Results: A total of 234 CVD deaths in men and 113 CVD deaths in women occurred during follow-up. Levels of HDL-C and non‐HDL-C at baseline were significant and strong predictors of CVD death in both sexes. In contrast, LDL-C level was a somewhat weaker predictor of CVD death in both. Differences of 0.78 mmol/L (30 mg/ dL) in non‐HDL-C and LDL-C levels corresponded to increases in CVD risk of 19% and 15%, respectively, in men. In women, differences of 0.78 mmol/L (30 mg/dL) in non‐HDL-C and LDL-C levels corresponded to increases in CVD risk of 11% and 8%, respectively. Conclusions: Non‐HDL-C level is a somewhat better predictor of CVD mortality than LDL-C level. Screening for non‐HDL-C level may be useful for CVD risk assessment.

636 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education (SHAPE) Task Force presents a new practice guideline for cardiovascular screening in the asymptomatic at-risk population, calling for noninvasive screening of all asymptonomatic men 45‐75 years of age and asymPTomatic women 55‐75years of age to detect and treat those with subclinical atherosclerosis.
Abstract: Screening for early-stage asymptomatic cancers (eg, cancers of breast and colon) to prevent late-stage malignancies has been widely accepted. However, although atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (eg, heart attack and stroke) accounts for more death and disability than all cancers combined, there are no national screening guidelines for asymptomatic (subclinical) atherosclerosis, and there is no governmentor healthcare-sponsored reimbursement for atherosclerosis screening. Part I and Part II of this consensus statement elaborated on new discoveries in the field of atherosclerosis that led to the concept of the “vulnerable patient.” These landmark discoveries, along with new diagnostic and therapeutic options, have set the stage for the next step: translation of this knowledge into a new practice of preventive cardiology. The identification and treatment of the vulnerable patient are the focuses of this consensus statement. In this report, the Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education (SHAPE) Task Force presents a new practice guideline for cardiovascular screening in the asymptomatic at-risk population. In summary, the SHAPE Guideline calls for noninvasive screening of all asymptomatic men 45‐75 years of age and asymptomatic women 55‐75 years of age (except those defined as very low risk) to detect and treat those with subclinical atherosclerosis. A variety of screening tests are available, and the cost-effectiveness of their use in a comprehensive strategy must be validated. Some of these screening tests, such as measurement of coronary artery calcification by computed tomography scanning and carotid artery intima‐media thickness and plaque by ultrasonography, have been available longer than others and are capable of providing direct evidence for the presence and extent of atherosclerosis. Both of these imaging methods provide prognostic information of proven value regarding the future risk of heart attack and stroke. Careful and responsible implementation of these tests as part of a comprehensive risk assessment and reduction approach is warranted and outlined by this report. Other tests for the detection of atherosclerosis and abnormal arterial structure and function, such as magnetic resonance imaging of the great arteries, studies of small and large artery stiffness, and assessment of systemic endothelial dysfunction, are emerging and must be further validated. The screening results (severity of subclinical arterial disease) combined with risk factor assessment are used for risk stratification to identify the vulnerable patient and initiate appropriate therapy. The higher the risk, the more vulnerable an individual is to a near-term adverse event. Because <10% of the population who test positive for atherosclerosis will experience a near-term event, additional risk stratification based on reliable markers of disease activity is needed and is expected to further focus the search for the vulnerable patient in the future. All individuals with asymptomatic atherosclerosis should be counseled and treated to prevent progression to overt

635 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Odds ratio
68.7K papers, 3M citations
90% related
Public health
158.3K papers, 3.9M citations
89% related
Risk factor
91.9K papers, 5.7M citations
89% related
Randomized controlled trial
119.8K papers, 4.8M citations
87% related
Health care
342.1K papers, 7.2M citations
86% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20223
2021736
2020871
2019821
20181,027
20171,365