Topic
Mass transfer coefficient
About: Mass transfer coefficient is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 7827 publications have been published within this topic receiving 168354 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated ozone absorption into water in a bubble-free ozone-water contacting process with tubular hydrophilic and hydrophobized Shirasu porous glass (SPG) membranes having uniform pore diameter.
53 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, a 3D conical micro-reactor was used for continuous re-entrance flow in selective extraction of Co from Ni sulfate solution with Cyanex 272.
53 citations
TL;DR: The physical solubility and mass transfer performance of CO2 absorption into aqueous N,N-dimethylethanolamine (DMEA) solution were comprehensively studied in this article.
53 citations
TL;DR: Investigation in a batch uptake adsorption system to quantify solid‐phase diffusion rates as a function of bulk phase viscosity found uptake was observed to be a strong function of the film mass transfer coefficient.
Abstract: In this study, solid-phase adsorption by macroporous and hyper-diffusive resins was investigated in a batch uptake adsorption system to quantify solid-phase diffusion rates as a function of bulk phase viscosity. The performance of chromatographic resins used for adsorption of proteins is dependent on several factors including solid and liquid-phase diffusivity, boundary layer mass transfer, and intraparticle mass transfer effects. Understanding these effects is critical to process development and optimization of both packed and fluidized bed adsorption systems. The macroporous resin used here was Streamline SP, and the hyper-diffusive resin was S-HyperD LS. Both have been frequently used in fluidized bed adsorption of proteins; however, factors that affect uptake rates of these media are not well quantified. Adsorption isotherms were well represented by an empirical fit of a Langmuir isotherm. Solid-phase diffusion coefficients obtained from simulations were in agreement with other models for macroporous and hyper-diffusive particles. S-HyperD LS in the buffer system had the highest uptake rate, but increased bulk phase viscosity decreased the rate by approximately 50%. Increases in bulk phase viscosity increased film mass transfer effects, and uptake was observed to be a strong function of the film mass transfer coefficient. Uptake by Streamline SP particles was slower than S-HyperD in buffer, due to a greater degree of intraparticle mass transfer resistance. The effect of increased film mass transfer resistance coupled with intraparticle mass transfer resistances at an increased bulk phase viscosity resulted in a decrease of 80% in the uptake rate by Streamline SP relative to S-HyperD.
53 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the effect of pressure on gas holdup and volumetric mass transfer coefficient appeared significantly in the case where the single nozzle with smaller diameter were used as gas disperser.
53 citations