scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Mechanically stabilized earth

About: Mechanically stabilized earth is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 856 publications have been published within this topic receiving 11672 citations.


Papers
More filters
01 Aug 1997
TL;DR: This web page or its webmaster does not provide insurance against liability, for any damages including lost profits, lost savings or any other incidental or consequential damages arising from the use or inability to use the information contained within.
Abstract: And much more... All of the information, data and computer software (“information”) presented on this web site is for general information only. While every effort will be made to insure its accuracy, this information should not be used or relied on for any specific application without independent, competent professional examination and verification of its accuracy, suitability and applicability by a licensed professional. Anyone making use of this information does so at his or her own risk and assumes any and all liability resulting from such use. The entire risk as to quality or usability of the information contained within is with the reader. In no event will this web page or webmaster be held liable, nor does this web page or its webmaster provide insurance against liability, for any damages including lost profits, lost savings or any other incidental or consequential damages arising from the use or inability to use the information contained within.

457 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a 3-in. (75mm) wide strip footing on sand reinforced with strips of aluminum foil was used to test the bearing capacity of three foundation conditions: (1) uniform density sand to large depth; (2) sand overlying an extensive soft layer; and (3) sand overlaying a potential cavern or localized weak pocket.
Abstract: Results are presented for some 65 bearing capacity tests using a 3-in. (75-mm) wide strip footing on sand reinforced with strips of aluminum foil. Three foundation conditions are considered: (1) Uniform density sand to large depth; (2) sand overlying an extensive soft layer; and (3) sand overlying a potential cavern or localized weak pocket. The vertical spacing and concentration of reinforcing layers were varied to obtain the optimum arrangement for each condition. The data show that considerable benefit may be obtained in both load settlement and ultimate bearing capacity by use of a modest amount of reinforcing.

379 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a triaxial testing program was conducted to investigate the stress-strain relationship and strength of tire chips and a mixture of sand and tire chips, and the test results and additional information from the literature were used in the numerical modeling of wall backfills, both unreinforced and reinforced with geosynthetics.
Abstract: The growing interest in utilizing waste materials in civil engineering applications has opened the possibility of constructing reinforced soil structures with unconventional backfills. Scrap tires are a high-profile waste material for which several uses have been studied, including the use of shredded tires as backfill. A triaxial testing program was conducted to investigate the stress-strain relationship and strength of tire chips and a mixture of sand and tire chips. The test results and additional information from the literature were used in the numerical modeling of wall backfills, both unreinforced and reinforced with geosynthetics. The numerical modeling results suggest tire shreds, particularly when mixed with sand, may be effectively used as backfill.

333 citations

Book
01 May 1996
TL;DR: In this paper, a combined aboveground soil improvement with belowground subsoil improvement schemes can be a viable alternative to the existing method of supporting earth embankments and landfills with precast concrete piles, which may prove detrimental and more expensive in a subsiding environment.
Abstract: The presence of thick deposits of soft clay combined with the effects of ground subsidence cause problems for engineering constructions for lowland areas such as the Central Plain (Chao Phraya) of Thailand The ground subsidence is caused by the excessive extraction of ground water To mitigate such natural geological hazards, different soil/ground improvement methods have been studied, namely: mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) embankments, granular or sand compaction piles, vertical drains, and the lime/cement deep mixing method In view of their proven performance, durability, constructibility, short time schedule, and low costs, mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) or earth reinforcement techniques seem to be very suitable and favorable aboveground soil improvement methods of embankment fills on subsiding ground This method can be most appropriately combined with the various belowground improvement techniques such as vertical drains, sand compaction piles, and the lime/cement deep mixing method Thus, the combined aboveground soil improvement with belowground subsoil improvement schemes can be a viable alternative to the existing method of supporting earth embankments and landfills with precast concrete piles, which may prove detrimental and more expensive in a subsiding environment

282 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the construction and surcharge loading response of four full-scale reinforced-soil segmental retaining walls is simulated using the program FLAC, and the numerical model implementation is described and constitutive models for the component materials (i.e., modular block facing units, backfill and four different reinforcement materials) are presented.
Abstract: The construction and surcharge loading response of four full-scale reinforced-soil segmental retaining walls is simulated using the program FLAC. The numerical model implementation is described and constitutive models for the component materials (i.e., modular block facing units, backfill, and four different reinforcement materials) are presented. The influence of backfill compaction and reinforcement type on end-of-construction and surcharge loading response is investigated. Predicted response features of each test wall are compared against measured boundary loads, wall displacements, and reinforcement strain values. Physical test measurements are unique in the literature because they include a careful estimate of the reliability of measured data. Predictions capture important qualitative features of each of the four walls and in many instances the quantitative predictions are within measurement accuracy. Where predictions are poor, explanations are provided. The comprehensive and high quality physical data reported in this paper and the lessons learned by the writers are of value to researchers engaged in the development of numerical models to extend the limited available database of physical data for reinforced soil wall response.

258 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Aggregate (composite)
31K papers, 354.1K citations
75% related
Landslide
24.6K papers, 472.1K citations
73% related
Hydraulic conductivity
12K papers, 339.7K citations
70% related
Portland cement
27.4K papers, 487.4K citations
69% related
Plane stress
13.3K papers, 326.2K citations
69% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202311
202235
202133
202025
201930
201834