Topic
Mental health
About: Mental health is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 183794 publications have been published within this topic receiving 4340463 citations. The topic is also known as: mental wellbeing.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: In this paper, a review of the literature on the prevalence of mental health problems among women with a history of intimate partner violence is presented, with a focus on depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Abstract: This article reviews literature on the prevalence of mental health problems among women with a history of intimate partner violence. The weighted mean prevalence of mental health problems among battered women was 47.6% in 18 studies of depression, 17.9% in 13 studies of suicidality, 63.8% in 11 studies of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), 18.5% in 10 studies of alcohol abuse, and 8.9% in four studies of drug abuse. These were typically inconsistent across studies. Weighted mean odds ratios representing associations of these problems with violence ranged from 3.55 to 5.62, and were typically consistent across studies. Variability was accounted for by differences in sampling frames. Dose-response relationships of violence to depression and PTSD were observed. Although research has not addressed many criteria for causal inferences, the existing research is consistent with the hypothesis that intimate partner violence increases risk for mental health problems. The appropriate way to conceptualize these problems deserves careful attention.
1,703 citations
TL;DR: Despite an increase in the rate of treatment, most patients with a mental disorder did not receive treatment and continued efforts are needed to obtain data on the effectiveness of treatment in order to increase the use of effective treatments.
Abstract: Background Although the 1990s saw enormous change in the mental health care system in the United States, little is known about changes in the prevalence or rate of treatment of mental disorders. Methods We examined trends in the prevalence and rate of treatment of mental disorders among people 18 to 54 years of age during roughly the past decade. Data from the National Comorbidity Survey (NCS) were obtained in 5388 face-to-face household interviews conducted between 1990 and 1992, and data from the NCS Replication were obtained in 4319 interviews conducted between 2001 and 2003. Anxiety disorders, mood disorders, and substance-abuse disorders that were present during the 12 months before the interview were diagnosed with the use of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV). Treatment for emotional disorders was categorized according to the sector of mental health services: psychiatry services, other mental health services, general...
1,699 citations
TL;DR: The results suggest that comorbidity results from common, underlying core psychopathological processes, and argue for focusing research on these core processes themselves, rather than on their varied manifestations as separate disorders.
Abstract: Background This report presents the results of confirmatory factor analyses of patterns of comorbidity among 10 common mental disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey, a national probability sample of US civilians who completed structured diagnostic interviews. Methods Patterns of comorbidity among DSM-III-R mental disorders were analyzed via confirmatory factor analyses for the entire National Comorbidity Survey sample (N=8098; age range, 15-54 years), for random halves of the sample, for men and women separately, and for a subsample of participants who were seeing a professional about their mental health problems. Four models were compared: a 1-factor model, a 2-factor model in which some disorders represented internalizing problems and others represented externalizing problems, a 3-factor variant of the 2-factor model in which internalizing was modeled as having 2 subfactors (anxious-misery and fear), and a 4-factor model in which the disorders represented separate affective, anxiety, substance dependence, and antisocial factors. Results The 3-factor model provided the best fit in the entire sample. This result was replicated across random halves of the sample as well as across women and men. The substantial empirical intercorrelation between anxious-misery and fear (0.73) suggested that these factors were most appropriately conceived as subfactors of a higher-order internalizing factor. In the treatment sample, the 2-factor model fit best. Conclusions The results offer a novel perspective on comorbidity, suggesting that comorbidity results from common, underlying core psychopathological processes. The results thereby argue for focusing research on these core processes themselves, rather than on their varied manifestations as separate disorders.
1,698 citations
Book•
01 Jan 1987
TL;DR: In this article, the effects of work and unemployment on mental health are studied and discussed, such as why some people are more harmed by unemployment than others; why certain job transitions are more difficult; and what we mean by "mental health" and how we can measure it.
Abstract: Here is a challenging study on the effects of work and unemployment on mental health. Examined in this comprehensive study are issues such as why some people are more harmed by unemployment than others; why certain job transitions are more difficult; and what we mean by "mental health" and how we can measure it. The author introduces nine characteristics of any environment and shows how they give rise to the harmful and beneficial consequences of work and unemployment. The book gathers integrates the extensive and widely-dissemenated research into the topic and places it in an original and logical conceptual framework.
1,697 citations
TL;DR: Every country can and should begin now to improve its efforts to treat people with mental illness, and 10 recommendations on how governments can strengthen their country’s mental health care are concluded.
Abstract: As I write these words in mid October I reflect on the way in which we have, during the past 4 weeks, expressed our shared grief in understanding, sympathy, and support for those affected by posttraumatic stress. We are reminded of the extraordinary ability of humans tocopewithextremesofemotion,tohelp each other, and to handle fear, pain, and loss. We work together to preserve our mental health. We see nothing wrong, or mysterious, in our coping mechanisms. But we do not expect people to have to cope alone, in isolation. We understandtheneedforhelpandguidance. As health care professionals, we know that mental illness is not a personal failure. If there is failure, it is in the way society in general and the health sector in particular have responded to people with mental and neurological disorders. By separating mental health care from physical health care—and often separating those who have mental illness from society—the health care profession has reinforced stigma, making successful treatment much harder. I see this as a time of opportunity for change, and I agree strongly with an earlier JOURNAL article by US Surgeon General David Satcher ( JAMA. 2001; 285:1697). Every country can and should begin now to improve its efforts to treat people with mental illness. A recent WHO global survey of mental health policy issues, Atlas of Mental HealthResources in theWorld2001 (http:// www.who.int/mental health/Publication Pages/Pubs 2001.html), found that 40% of the 185 countries surveyed have no national mental health policy, 30% have no programs to improve mental health conditions, and 25% have no specific mental health legislation. Well over one third (37%) of the countries have no community care facilities. The global toll of mental illness and neurological disorders is staggering. Neuropsychiatric disorders account for 31% of the disability in the world— and they affect rich and poor nations and individuals alike. According to the World Health Report 2001, Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope (http://www.who.int/whr/), 450 million people have a mental or neurological disorder. Of these, 121 million have depression and 50 million have epilepsy. Every year, 1 million people commit suicide and 10 million to 20 million attempt suicide. A great deal of this suffering is unnecessary. We know, for instance, that 60% of those with major depression can fully recover if treated. However, in both industrialized and developing countries, less than 25% of those affected receive treatment, for reasons that include stigma, discrimination, scarce resources, lack of skills in primary health care, and deficient public health policies. The treatment gap is similar or greater for many other easily treatable mental and neurological disorders. Because people do not get the care they need, these disorders impose a range of social and economic costs on individuals, households, employers, and society, ranging from the cost of care to the cost of lost productivity. Solutions based on scientific evidence are available and affordable. Through recent advances in neuroscience, neuroimaging, genetics, and behavioral sciences, we know more about brain functioning and behavior than ever before. Breakthroughs in therapy and medication have occurred. In the World Health Report 2001, WHO summarizes current knowledge about mental and neurological disorders: the global burden, current level of care, latest knowledge about causes and treatment, and ongoing efforts to reform mental health care. The report concludes with 10 recommendations on how governments can strengthen their country’s mental health care: • provide treatment for mental disorders within primary care; • ensure that psychotropic drugs are available; • replace large custodial hospitals with community care facilities backed by general hospital psychiatric beds and home care support; • launch public awareness campaigns to overcome stigma and discrimination; • involve communities, families, and consumers in decision making on policies and services; • establish national policies, programs, and legislation; • train mental health professionals; • link mental health with other social sectors; • monitor community mental health; and • support more research. The report outlines three scenarios to help guide countries and population groups, depending on the resources available and the current status of mental health care in each country. Regarding treatment, for example, if even the poorest countries could ensure that the five most needed psychotropic drugs were available in all health care settings, we could ease the suffering of millions of people. If many middle-income countries could use the experiences of others as a guide and initiate pilot projects for community care, parts of or entire custodial institutions could be shut down, and the financial savings could strengthen further community care activities. If some of the richest countries could review their health care financing rules to ensure parity between mental and physical health problems, a major obstacle to treatment could be removed. We need to speed up and strengthen care for the mentally ill. —Gro Harlem Brundtland, MD, MPH Director-General World Health Organization FROM THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
1,683 citations