scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Metadata repository

About: Metadata repository is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 5841 publications have been published within this topic receiving 121778 citations.


Papers
More filters
Book
22 Jun 2004
TL;DR: A comparison of Classic, Analog and Modern, Digital TV, and the W3C Metadata Model: Converging Broadcasting Metadata Standards 4 Digital Broadcast Item Model (DBIM) 4.1 Purpose and Objectives 4.2 Unified Life-Cycle and Work.
Abstract: Contents Part I Theory 1 New Paradigms in Broadcast Multimedia 1.1 Comparison of Classic, Analog and Modern, Digital TV 1.2 First Thoughts about Metadata in Broadcast Multimedia 1.3 Basic Definitions 1.4 Structure of the Book 2 World of Digital Interactive TV 2.1 Broadcast Multimedia 2.1.1 MPEG-2 2.1.2 DVB 2.1.3 MHP 2.1.4 Emerging DVB Standardization Efforts 2.1.5 ATSC-DASE and Open Cable 2.1.6 ISDB-BML 2.1.7 Adoption of the Standards 2.2 Digital TV Asset Life-Cycle 2.3 Examples of Digital TV Value-Added Services 2.3.1 Electronic Program Guide (EPG) 2.3.2 Information Portal 2.3.3 Pay-per-View (PpV) 2.3.4 Video-on-Demand (VoD) 2.3.5 Education 2.3.6 Shopping 2.3.7 Games 2.3.8 Standard Internet Services 2.3.9 Communication 2.3.10 Community Services 2.3.11 Government 2.3.12 Health 2.3.13 Finance and Banking 3 Metadata Fundamentals and Concepts 3.1 Digital TV Metadata Life-Cycle 3.2 Theoretical Foundations of Metadata 3.2.1 Metadata Tier Model 3.2.2 Theory behind the W3C Metadata De.nition Family 3.2.3 Practical Example 3.3 W3C Metadata Families 3.3.1 Overview of the W3C Metadata Families 3.3.2 XML 3.3.3 XML schema 3.4 MPEG-7 - Multimedia Content Description Interface 3.4.1 Overview 3.4.2 MPEG-7 Metadata De.nitions 3.4.3 Basic Elements and Schema Tools 3.4.4 Annotating Multimedia Assets 3.4.5 Grouping Multimedia Assets: Content Organization 3.4.6 Managing Conventional Media Archive Information 3.4.7 Easy Navigation and Access 3.4.8 Personalization, User Interaction and Consumer Profiles 3.4.9 Audio Descriptors 3.4.10 Visual Descriptors 3.4.11 MPEG-7 Systems 3.5 MPEG-21 Packages Multimedia Assets 3.5.1 Perception of Multimedia Assets through DIs 3.5.2 Digital Item Declaration (DIDL) 3.5.3 Digital Item Adaptation 3.5.4 Road Ahead for MPEG-21 3.6 MHP and Metadata 3.6.1 'Metadata Way' of MHP 3.6.2 DVB-HTML 3.7 TV-Anytime 3.7.1 Personal Data Recorder 3.7.2 Content Reference Identifier (CRID) 3.7.3 Metadata Process Model 3.7.4 Metadata Definitions 3.7.5 Broadcast Channel Aspects 3.7.6 Feedback Channel Aspects 3.8 SMPTE Metadata De.nitions 3.8.1 SMPTE Metadata Dictionary (Content & Structure) 3.8.2 Universal Material Identifier (UMID) 3.8.3 Key-Length-Value (KLV) 3.9 Advanced Authoring Format (AAF) 3.10 General Exchange Format (GXF) 3.11 Material eXchange Format (MXF) 3.12 EBU's P/META Metadata Exchange Scheme 3.13 Converging Broadcasting Metadata Standards 4 Digital Broadcast Item Model (DBIM) 4.1 Purpose and Objectives 4.2 Unified Life-Cycle and Work.ow Model 4.2.1 Example: Converging TV-Anytime and DBIM Work Flows 4.3 Architectural Components - A More Detailed View 4.3.1 DBIM Metadata Building Blocks 4.3.2 Metadata Protocol Stack - Linkage Metadata Definitions 4.3.3 Service Architecture 4.3.4 Metadata Protocol Stack 4.4 DBIM Metadata Structures 4.4.1 Basic Tools 4.4.2 Multimedia Asset Tools 4.4.3 Object Tools 4.4.4 Service Tools 4.4.5 Narrative Tools 4.4.6 Vertical Tools 4.5 Digital Broadcast Item (DBI) 4.6 Dynamic DBI Process Model 4.6.1 Different Item Types in the Metadata Life-Cycle 4.6.2 DBO Phases 5 Metadata System View 5.1 Characteristics of the Linkage Tier 5.2 Metadata-Based Service Architecture 5.2.1 Logical Feedback Channel Architecture 5.2.2 Logical Broadcast Channel Architecture 5.3 Metadata Protocol Stack 5.3.1 Abstract Metadata Protocol Stack Model 5.3.2 Internet Protocol Suite 5.3.3 Transmitting Metadata over Broadcast Channel Protocols 5.3.4 Communication Modes on Application Layer Protocol Suites 5.3.5 Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) 5.3.6 Streaming Binary XML -

58 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An online survey of cataloging and metadata professionals in the United States examines the perceived importance of metadata quality, metadata quality evaluation criteria and issues, and mechanisms for building quality assurance into the metadata creation process.
Abstract: This article evaluates practices on metadata quality control in digital repositories and collections using an online survey of cataloging and metadata professionals in the United States. The study examines (1) the perceived importance of metadata quality, (2) metadata quality evaluation criteria and issues, and (3) mechanisms for building quality assurance into the metadata creation process. The survey finds wide recognition of the essential role of metadata quality assurance. Accuracy and consistency are prioritized as the main criteria for metadata quality evaluation. Metadata semantics greatly affects consistent and accurate metadata application. Strong awareness of metadata quality correlates with the widespread adoption of various quality control mechanisms, such as staff training, manual review, metadata guidelines, and metadata generation tools. And yet, metadata guidelines are used less frequently as a quality assurance mechanism in digital collections involving multiple institutions.

58 citations

Proceedings Article
11 Oct 2004
TL;DR: The National Science Digital Library (NSDL) is exploring options for augmenting harvested metadata and re-exposing the augmented metadata to downstream users with detailed information on how it was created and by whom.
Abstract: Digital libraries have, in the main, adopted the traditional library notion of the metadata "record" as the basic unit of management and exchange. Although this simplifies the harvest and re-exposure of metadata, it limits the ability of metadata aggregators to improve the quality of metadata and to share specifics of those improvements with others. The National Science Digital Library (NSDL) is exploring options for augmenting harvested metadata and re-exposing the augmented metadata to downstream users with detailed information on how it was created and by whom. The key to this augmentation process involves changing the basic metadata unit from "record" to "statement."

58 citations

Patent
Ronald Martinez1
10 Oct 2005
TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a set of metadata for association with the composite media item and a tool for creating composite media items with an associated set metadata. In one embodiment, the new metadata is a data container.
Abstract: A set of metadata for association with the composite media item and a tool for creating a composite media item with an associated set metadata. In one embodiment, the tool comprises a component for extracting a portion of a first media item having first metadata and for extracting a portion of a second media item having second metadata, a component for combining the first portion and the second portion to form a composite media item, and a component for analyzing the first metadata and the second metadata to extract portions of the first and second metadata to form a new set of metadata for association with the composite media item. In one embodiment, the new metadata is a data container.

58 citations

Patent
24 Sep 2008
TL;DR: In this article, a method of identifying application metadata in a backup stream comprises finding a known application metadata signature within the backup stream and removing the metadata from consideration by a data de-duplicator.
Abstract: A method of identifying application metadata in a backup stream comprises finding a known application metadata signature within a backup stream. A source application of user data in the backup stream is identified based upon the known application metadata signature. Application metadata, which has been generated by the source application, is removed from consideration by a data de-duplicator which is used to perform data de-duplication on the backup stream.

58 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Information system
107.5K papers, 1.8M citations
85% related
User interface
85.4K papers, 1.7M citations
81% related
Software
130.5K papers, 2M citations
80% related
Mobile computing
51.3K papers, 1M citations
80% related
Support vector machine
73.6K papers, 1.7M citations
80% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202332
202279
202113
202011
201921
201824