scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Morality

About: Morality is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 22623 publications have been published within this topic receiving 545733 citations. The topic is also known as: moral & morals.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Addams as mentioned in this paper argued that each member of a democracy is under a moral obligation to seek out diverse experiences, making a daily effort to confront others' perspectives, and that democracy must be seen as a social rather than an individual endeavor and democracy as a way of life rather than merely a basis for laws.
Abstract: Nearly a century before the advent of "multiculturalism," Jane Addams put forward her conception of the moral significance of diversity. Each member of a democracy, Addams believed, is under a moral obligation to seek out diverse experiences, making a daily effort to confront others' perspectives. Morality must be seen as a social rather than an individual endeavor, and democracy as a way of life rather than merely a basis for laws. Failing this, both democracy and ethics remain sterile, empty concepts. In this, Addams' earliest book on ethics - presented here with a substantial introduction by Charlene Haddock Seigfried - she reflects on the factors that hinder the ability of all members of society to determine their own well-being. Observing relationships between charitable workers and their clients, between factory owners and their employers, and between household employers and their servants, she identifies sources of friction and shows how conceiving of democracy as a social obligation can lead to new, mutually beneficial lines of conduct. She also considers the proper education of workers, struggles between parents and their adult daughters over conflicting family and social claims, and the merging of politics with the daily lives of constituents. "The sphere of morals is the sphere of action," Addams proclaims. It is not enough to believe passively in the innate dignity of all human beings. Rather, one must work daily to root out racial, gender, class, and other prejudices from personal relationships.

124 citations

Book
01 Jan 2000
TL;DR: The Lex Permissiva: property rights and political obligation in the Rechtslehre as mentioned in this paper is an example of Kantian metaphysics in contemporary liberalism, and it is the metaphysics of freedom as an idea of reason.
Abstract: 1. Kantian metaphysics in contemporary liberalism 2. The metaphysics of freedom as an idea of reason 3. The morality of external freedom 4. The Lex Permissiva: property rights and political obligation in the Rechtslehre 5. The general united will and cosmopolitan right 6. The metaphysics of Kant's cosmopolitanism.

124 citations

Book ChapterDOI
02 Oct 2013

124 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is suggested that Haidt's theory is inadequate as a scientific account of morality, but the theory's weaknesses are instructive, and hence, criticism may be useful to psychologists, neuroscientists, and philosophers attempting to advance theories of morality.
Abstract: Jonathan Haidt's Moral Foundations Theory is an influential scientific account of morality incorporating psychological, developmental, and evolutionary perspectives. The theory proposes that morality is built upon five innate "foundations," each of which is believed to have been selected for during human evolution and, subsequently, tuned-up by learning during development. We argue here that although some general elements of Haidt's theory are plausible, many other important aspects of his account are seriously flawed. First, innateness and modularity figure centrally in Haidt's account, but terminological and conceptual problems foster confusion and ambiguities. Second, both the theory's proposed number of moral foundations and its taxonomy of the moral domain appear contrived, ignoring equally good candidate foundations and the possibility of substantial intergroup differences in the foundations' contents. Third, the mechanisms (viz., modules) and categorical distinctions (viz., between foundations) proposed by the theory are not consilient with discoveries in contemporary neuroscience concerning the organization, functioning, and development of the brain. In light of these difficulties, we suggest that Haidt's theory is inadequate as a scientific account of morality. Nevertheless, the theory's weaknesses are instructive, and hence, criticism may be useful to psychologists, neuroscientists, and philosophers attempting to advance theories of morality, as well as to researchers wishing to invoke concepts such as innateness and modularity more generally.

124 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Ideology
54.2K papers, 1.1M citations
90% related
Politics
263.7K papers, 5.3M citations
84% related
Social change
61.1K papers, 1.7M citations
82% related
Democracy
108.6K papers, 2.3M citations
81% related
Social group
17.1K papers, 829.4K citations
81% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20231,364
20222,692
2021672
2020843
2019856
2018861