Topic
Multi-swarm optimization
About: Multi-swarm optimization is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 19162 publications have been published within this topic receiving 549725 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
09 Mar 2005TL;DR: A new Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimizer is proposed, which is based on Pareto dominance and the use of a crowding factor to filter out the list of available leaders and incorporates the ∈-dominance concept to fix the size of the set of final solutions produced by the algorithm.
Abstract: In this paper, we propose a new Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimizer, which is based on Pareto dominance and the use of a crowding factor to filter out the list of available leaders. We also propose the use of different mutation (or turbulence) operators which act on different subdivisions of the swarm. Finally, the proposed approach also incorporates the ∈-dominance concept to fix the size of the set of final solutions produced by the algorithm. Our approach is compared against five state-of-the-art algorithms, including three PSO-based approaches recently proposed. The results indicate that the proposed approach is highly competitive, being able to approximate the front even in cases where all the other PSO-based approaches fail.
659 citations
••
TL;DR: Empirical results reveal that the problem solving success of the CK algorithm is very close to the DE algorithm and the run-time complexity and the required function-evaluation number for acquiring global minimizer by theDE algorithm is generally smaller than the comparison algorithms.
Abstract: In this paper, the algorithmic concepts of the Cuckoo-search (CK), Particle swarm optimization (PSO), Differential evolution (DE) and Artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithms have been analyzed. The numerical optimization problem solving successes of the mentioned algorithms have also been compared statistically by testing over 50 different benchmark functions. Empirical results reveal that the problem solving success of the CK algorithm is very close to the DE algorithm. The run-time complexity and the required function-evaluation number for acquiring global minimizer by the DE algorithm is generally smaller than the comparison algorithms. The performances of the CK and PSO algorithms are statistically closer to the performance of the DE algorithm than the ABC algorithm. The CK and DE algorithms supply more robust and precise results than the PSO and ABC algorithms.
656 citations
••
TL;DR: The experimental results and analysis suggest that CCPSO2 is a highly competitive optimization algorithm for solving large-scale and complex multimodal optimization problems.
Abstract: This paper presents a new cooperative coevolving particle swarm optimization (CCPSO) algorithm in an attempt to address the issue of scaling up particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms in solving large-scale optimization problems (up to 2000 real-valued variables). The proposed CCPSO2 builds on the success of an early CCPSO that employs an effective variable grouping technique random grouping. CCPSO2 adopts a new PSO position update rule that relies on Cauchy and Gaussian distributions to sample new points in the search space, and a scheme to dynamically determine the coevolving subcomponent sizes of the variables. On high-dimensional problems (ranging from 100 to 2000 variables), the performance of CCPSO2 compared favorably against a state-of-the-art evolutionary algorithm sep-CMA-ES, two existing PSO algorithms, and a cooperative coevolving differential evolution algorithm. In particular, CCPSO2 performed significantly better than sep-CMA-ES and two existing PSO algorithms on more complex multimodal problems (which more closely resemble real-world problems), though not as well as the existing algorithms on unimodal functions. Our experimental results and analysis suggest that CCPSO2 is a highly competitive optimization algorithm for solving large-scale and complex multimodal optimization problems.
649 citations
••
TL;DR: Improvements, effect of the different setting parameters, and functionality of the algorithm are shown in the scope of classical structural optimization problems, and results show the ability of the proposed methodology to find better optimal solutions for structural optimization tasks than other optimization algorithms.
646 citations