scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Mutation rate

About: Mutation rate is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 6328 publications have been published within this topic receiving 366309 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The hypothesis is developed that retinoblastoma is a cancer caused by two mutational events, in the dominantly inherited form, one mutation is inherited via the germinal cells and the second occurs in somatic cells.
Abstract: Based upon observations on 48 cases of retinoblastoma and published reports, the hypothesis is developed that retinoblastoma is a cancer caused by two mutational events. In the dominantly inherited form, one mutation is inherited via the germinal cells and the second occurs in somatic cells. In the nonhereditary form, both mutations occur in somatic cells. The second mutation produces an average of three retinoblastomas per individual inheriting the first mutation. Using Poisson statistics, one can calculate that this number (three) can explain the occasional gene carrier who gets no tumor, those who develop only unilateral tumors, and those who develop bilateral tumors, as well as explaining instances of multiple tumors in one eye. This value for the mean number of tumors occurring in genetic carriers may be used to estimate the mutation rate for each mutation. The germinal and somatic rates for the first, and the somatic rate for the second, mutation, are approximately equal. The germinal mutation may arise in some instances from a delayed mutation.

7,051 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Michael S. Lawrence1, Petar Stojanov2, Petar Stojanov1, Paz Polak1, Paz Polak2, Paz Polak3, Gregory V. Kryukov1, Gregory V. Kryukov2, Gregory V. Kryukov3, Kristian Cibulskis1, Andrey Sivachenko1, Scott L. Carter1, Chip Stewart1, Craig H. Mermel2, Craig H. Mermel1, Steven A. Roberts4, Adam Kiezun1, Peter S. Hammerman2, Peter S. Hammerman1, Aaron McKenna1, Aaron McKenna5, Yotam Drier, Lihua Zou1, Alex H. Ramos1, Trevor J. Pugh1, Trevor J. Pugh2, Nicolas Stransky1, Elena Helman1, Elena Helman6, Jaegil Kim1, Carrie Sougnez1, Lauren Ambrogio1, Elizabeth Nickerson1, Erica Shefler1, Maria L. Cortes1, Daniel Auclair1, Gordon Saksena1, Douglas Voet1, Michael S. Noble1, Daniel DiCara1, Pei Lin1, Lee Lichtenstein1, David I. Heiman1, Timothy Fennell1, Marcin Imielinski1, Marcin Imielinski2, Bryan Hernandez1, Eran Hodis2, Eran Hodis1, Sylvan C. Baca1, Sylvan C. Baca2, Austin M. Dulak1, Austin M. Dulak2, Jens G. Lohr2, Jens G. Lohr1, Dan A. Landau7, Dan A. Landau2, Dan A. Landau1, Catherine J. Wu2, Jorge Melendez-Zajgla, Alfredo Hidalgo-Miranda, Amnon Koren2, Amnon Koren1, Steven A. McCarroll1, Steven A. McCarroll2, Jaume Mora8, Ryan S. Lee9, Ryan S. Lee2, Brian D. Crompton9, Brian D. Crompton2, Robert C. Onofrio1, Melissa Parkin1, Wendy Winckler1, Kristin G. Ardlie1, Stacey Gabriel1, Charles W. M. Roberts2, Charles W. M. Roberts9, Jaclyn A. Biegel10, Kimberly Stegmaier1, Kimberly Stegmaier9, Kimberly Stegmaier2, Adam J. Bass1, Adam J. Bass2, Levi A. Garraway2, Levi A. Garraway1, Matthew Meyerson2, Matthew Meyerson1, Todd R. Golub, Dmitry A. Gordenin4, Shamil R. Sunyaev3, Shamil R. Sunyaev1, Shamil R. Sunyaev2, Eric S. Lander1, Eric S. Lander6, Eric S. Lander2, Gad Getz1, Gad Getz2 
11 Jul 2013-Nature
TL;DR: A fundamental problem with cancer genome studies is described: as the sample size increases, the list of putatively significant genes produced by current analytical methods burgeons into the hundreds and the list includes many implausible genes, suggesting extensive false-positive findings that overshadow true driver events.
Abstract: Major international projects are underway that are aimed at creating a comprehensive catalogue of all the genes responsible for the initiation and progression of cancer. These studies involve the sequencing of matched tumour-normal samples followed by mathematical analysis to identify those genes in which mutations occur more frequently than expected by random chance. Here we describe a fundamental problem with cancer genome studies: as the sample size increases, the list of putatively significant genes produced by current analytical methods burgeons into the hundreds. The list includes many implausible genes (such as those encoding olfactory receptors and the muscle protein titin), suggesting extensive false-positive findings that overshadow true driver events. We show that this problem stems largely from mutational heterogeneity and provide a novel analytical methodology, MutSigCV, for resolving the problem. We apply MutSigCV to exome sequences from 3,083 tumour-normal pairs and discover extraordinary variation in mutation frequency and spectrum within cancer types, which sheds light on mutational processes and disease aetiology, and in mutation frequency across the genome, which is strongly correlated with DNA replication timing and also with transcriptional activity. By incorporating mutational heterogeneity into the analyses, MutSigCV is able to eliminate most of the apparent artefactual findings and enable the identification of genes truly associated with cancer.

4,411 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Mar 1993-Genetics
TL;DR: From these properties, several new statistical tests based on a random sample of DNA sequences from the population are developed for testing the hypothesis that all mutations at a locus are neutral.
Abstract: Mutations in the genealogy of the sequences in a random sample from a population can be classified as external and internal. External mutations are mutations that occurred in the external branches and internal mutations are mutations that occurred in the internal branches of the genealogy. Under the assumption of selective neutrality, the expected number of external mutations is equal to theta = 4Ne mu, where Ne is the effective population size and mu is the rate of mutation per gene per generation. Interestingly, this expectation is independent of the sample size. The number of external mutations is likely to deviate from its neutral expectation when there is selection while the number of internal mutations is less affected by the presence of selection. Statistical properties of the numbers of external mutations and of internal mutations are studied and their relationships to two commonly used estimates of theta are derived. From these properties, several new statistical tests based on a random sample of DNA sequences from the population are developed for testing the hypothesis that all mutations at a locus are neutral.

3,880 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
10 Jun 1993-Nature
TL;DR: It is shown that 12 per cent of colorectal carcinomas carry somatic deletions in poly(dA . dT) sequences and other simple repeats, and it is concluded that these mutations reflect a previously undescribed form of carcinogenesis in the colon mediated by a mutation in a DNA replication factor resulting in reduced fidelity for replication or repair (a 'mutator mutation').
Abstract: Spontaneous errors in DNA replication have been suggested to play a significant role in neoplastic transformation and to explain the chromosomal alterations seen in cancer cells. A defective replication factor could increase the mutation rate in clonal variants arising during tumour progression, but despite intensive efforts, increases in tumour cell mutation rates have not been unambiguously shown. Here we use an unbiased genomic fingerprinting technique to show that 12 per cent of colorectal carcinomas carry somatic deletions in poly(dA.dT) sequences and other simple repeats. We estimate that cells from these tumours can carry more than 100,000 such mutations. Only tumours with affected poly(dA.dT) sequences carry mutations in the other simple repeats examined, and such mutations can be found in all neoplastic regions of multiple tumours from the same patient, including adenomas. Tumours with these mutations show distinctive genotypic and phenotypic features. We conclude that these mutations reflect a previously undescribed form of carcinogenesis in the colon (predisposition to which may be inherited) mediated by a mutation in a DNA replication factor resulting in reduced fidelity for replication or repair (a 'mutator mutation').

2,724 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
23 Jan 2014-Nature
TL;DR: It is found that large-scale genomic analysis can identify nearly all known cancer genes in these cancer types and 33 genes that were not previously known to be significantly mutated in cancer, including genes related to proliferation, apoptosis, genome stability, chromatin regulation, immune evasion, RNA processing and protein homeostasis.
Abstract: Although a few cancer genes are mutated in a high proportion of tumours of a given type (.20%), most are mutated at intermediate frequencies (2–20%). To explore the feasibility of creating a comprehensive catalogue of cancer genes, we analysed somatic point mutations in exome sequences from 4,742 human cancers and their matched normal-tissue samples across 21 cancer types. We found that large-scale genomic analysis can identify nearly all known cancer genes in these tumour types. Our analysis also identified 33 genes that were not previously known to be significantly mutated in cancer, including genes related to proliferation, apoptosis, genome stability, chromatin regulation, immune evasion, RNA processing and protein homeostasis. Down-sampling analysis indicates that larger sample sizes will reveal many more genes mutated at clinically important frequencies. We estimate that near-saturation may be achieved with 600– 5,000 samples per tumour type, depending on background mutation frequency. The results may help to guide the next stage of cancer genomics. Comprehensive knowledge of the genes underlying human cancers is a critical foundation for cancer diagnostics, therapeutics, clinical-trial design and selection of rational combination therapies. It is now possible to use genomic analysis to identify cancer genes in an unbiased fashion, based on the presence of somatic mutations at a rate significantly higher than the expected background level. Systematic studies have revealed many new cancer genes, as well as new classes of cancer genes 1,2 . They have also made clear that, although some cancer genes are mutated at high frequencies, most cancer genes in most patients occur at intermediate frequencies (2–20%) or lower. Accordingly, a complete catalogue of mutations in this frequency class will be essential for recognizing dysregulated pathways and optimal targets for therapeutic intervention. However, recent work suggests major gaps in our knowledge of cancer genes of intermediate frequency. For example, a study of 183 lung adenocarcinomas 3 found that 15% of patients lacked even a single mutation affecting any of the 10 known hallmarks of cancer, and 38% had 3 or fewer such mutations. In this paper, we analysed somatic point mutations (substitutions and small insertion and deletions) in nearly 5,000 human cancers and their matched normal-tissue samples (‘tumour–normal pairs’) across 21 tumour types. The questions that we examine here are: first, whether large-scale genomic analysis across tumour types can reliably identify all known cancer genes; second, whether it will reveal many new candidate cancer genes; and third, how far we are from having a complete catalogue of cancer genes (at least those of intermediate frequency). We used rigorous statistical methods to enumerate candidate cancer genes and then carefully inspected each gene to identify those with strong biological connections to cancer and mutational patterns consistent with the expected function. The analysis reveals nearly all known cancer genes and revealed 33 novel candidates, including genes related to proliferation, apoptosis, genome stability, chromatin regulation, immune evasion, RNA processing and protein homeostasis. Importantly, the data show that the

2,565 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Gene
211.7K papers, 10.3M citations
88% related
Genome
74.2K papers, 3.8M citations
88% related
Regulation of gene expression
85.4K papers, 5.8M citations
84% related
DNA
107.1K papers, 4.7M citations
83% related
Gene expression
113.3K papers, 5.5M citations
83% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023123
2022260
2021269
2020282
2019261
2018293