Norethisterone enanthate

About: Norethisterone enanthate is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 218 publications have been published within this topic receiving 4133 citations. The topic is also known as: 17alpha-Ethynyl-17beta-heptanoyloxy-4-estren-3-one & Norethisterone enanthate.

Hormonal Contraception and the Risk of HIV Acquisition: An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Observational studies of a putative association between hormonal contraception (HC) and HIV acquisition have produced conflicting results. We conducted an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of studies from sub-Saharan Africa to compare the incidence of HIV infection in women using combined oral contraceptives (COCs) or the injectable progestins depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) or norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) with women not using HC. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Eligible studies measured HC exposure and incident HIV infection prospectively using standardized measures, enrolled women aged 15-49 y, recorded ≥15 incident HIV infections, and measured prespecified covariates. Our primary analysis estimated the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) using two-stage random effects meta-analysis, controlling for region, marital status, age, number of sex partners, and condom use. We included 18 studies, including 37,124 women (43,613 woman-years) and 1,830 incident HIV infections. Relative to no HC use, the aHR for HIV acquisition was 1.50 (95% CI 1.24-1.83) for DMPA use, 1.24 (95% CI 0.84-1.82) for NET-EN use, and 1.03 (95% CI 0.88-1.20) for COC use. Between-study heterogeneity was mild (I(2) < 50%). DMPA use was associated with increased HIV acquisition compared with COC use (aHR 1.43, 95% CI 1.23-1.67) and NET-EN use (aHR 1.32, 95% CI 1.08-1.61). Effect estimates were attenuated for studies at lower risk of methodological bias (compared with no HC use, aHR for DMPA use 1.22, 95% CI 0.99-1.50; for NET-EN use 0.67, 95% CI 0.47-0.96; and for COC use 0.91, 95% CI 0.73-1.41) compared to those at higher risk of bias (p(interaction) = 0.003). Neither age nor herpes simplex virus type 2 infection status modified the HC-HIV relationship. CONCLUSIONS: This IPD meta-analysis found no evidence that COC or NET-EN use increases women's risk of HIV but adds to the evidence that DMPA may increase HIV risk, underscoring the need for additional safe and effective contraceptive options for women at high HIV risk. A randomized controlled trial would provide more definitive evidence about the effects of hormonal contraception, particularly DMPA, on HIV risk.

Use of hormonal contraceptives and HIV acquisition in women: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence

Abstract: Summary Whether or not the use of hormonal contraception affects risk of HIV acquisition is an important question for public health. We did a systematic review, searching PubMed and Embase, aiming to explore the possibility of an association between various forms of hormonal contraception and risk of HIV acquisition. We identified 20 relevant prospective studies, eight of which met our minimum quality criteria. Of these eight, all reported findings for progestin-only injectables, and seven also reported findings for oral contraceptive pills. Most of the studies that assessed the use of oral contraceptive pills showed no significant association with HIV acquisition. None of the three studies that assessed the use of injectable norethisterone enanthate showed a significant association with HIV acquisition. Studies that assessed the use of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) or non-specified injectable contraceptives had heterogeneous methods and mixed results, with some investigators noting a 1·5–2·2 times increased risk of HIV acquisition, and others reporting no association. Thus, some, but not all, observational data raise concern about a potential association between use of DMPA and risk of HIV acquisition. More definitive evidence for the existence and size of any potential effect could inform appropriate counselling and policy responses in countries with varied profiles of HIV risk, maternal mortality, and access to contraceptive services.

Hormonal contraceptive use and women's risk of HIV acquisition: a meta-analysis of observational studies

Abstract: Summary Background The evidence from epidemiological research into whether use of hormonal contraception increases women's risk of HIV acquisition is inconsistent. We did a robust meta-analysis of existing data to provide summary estimates by hormonal contraceptive method which can be used to inform contraceptive guidelines, models, and future studies. Methods We updated a recent systematic review to identify and describe studies that met inclusion criteria. To ensure inclusion of more recent research, we searched PubMed for articles published after December, 2011, using the terms "hormonal contraception", "HIV/acquisition", "injectables", "progestin", and "oral contraceptive pills". We assessed statistical heterogeneity for these studies, and, when appropriate, combined point estimates by hormonal contraception formulation using random-effects models. We assessed publication bias and investigated heterogeneity through subgroup and stratified analyses according to study population and design features. Findings We identified 26 studies, 12 of which met inclusion criteria. There was evidence of an increase in HIV risk in the ten studies of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 1·40, 95% CI 1·16–1·69). This risk was lower in the eight studies done in women in the general population (pooled HR 1·31, 95% CI 1·10–1·57). There was substantial between-study heterogeneity in secondary analyses of trials (n=7, I 2 51·1%, 95% CI 0–79·3). Although individual study estimates suggested an increased risk, substantial heterogeneity between two studies done in women at high risk of HIV infection ( I 2 54%, 0–88·7) precluded pooling estimates. There was no evidence of an increased HIV risk in ten studies of oral contraceptive pills (pooled HR 1·00, 0·86–1·16) or five studies of norethisterone enanthate (pooled HR 1·10, 0·88–1·37). Interpretation Our findings show a moderate increased risk of HIV acquisition for all women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, with a smaller increase in risk for women in the general population. Whether the risks of HIV observed in our study would merit complete withdrawal of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate needs to be balanced against the known benefits of a highly effective contraceptive. Funding None.

Intramuscular testosterone undecanoate and norethisterone enanthate in a clinical trial for male contraception.

Abstract: Recent trials for hormonal male contraception are based on gestagens or GnRH antagonists combined with oral or injectable testosterone substitution. However, the efficacy of most trials remained disappointing. Norethisterone enanthate (NETE) has been used as a long-acting injectable female contraceptive and has shown sustained suppression of spermatogenesis in male monkeys and prolonged suppression of gonadotropins in men. This study was designed to prove the efficacy of the long-acting testosterone undecanoate ester (TU) alone or in combination with NETE in a phase II clinical trial. Fourteen healthy men received injections of 1000 mg TU in combination with injections of 200 mg NETE every 6 weeks over a period of 24 weeks, followed by a control period of 28 weeks. Another 14 volunteers received TU alone. During the study semen variables, reproductive hormones, clinical chemistry and lipid parameters, well-being, and sexual function were monitored. Scrotal content and prostates were checked sonographically. During the entire treatment period mean testosterone serum concentrations remained within the normal limits. Marked suppression of gonadotropins in both treatment groups resulted in azoospermia in 7 of 14 and 13 of 14 volunteers and in oligozoospermia in 7 of 14 and 1 of 14 in the groups given TU only or TU/NETE, respectively. However, the highest azoospermia rate in the TU/NETE group was achieved 8 weeks after the end of the treatment period, and 1 volunteer with very high initial sperm counts (mean, 190 million/mL at baseline) remained oligozoospermic (10.2 million/mL). From week 20 to week 24 there was a significant, fully reversible maximum weight gain of 3.7 kg, on the average, in the NETE group. In the NETE and TU alone groups there were significant 26.6% and 11.5% maximum decreases in high density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with baseline values during the treatment period. A significant elevation of low density lipoprotein and a decrease in lipoprotein(a) were detected in the TU/NETE group. In conclusion, combination treatment with NETE showed suppression of spermatogenesis comparable with results using testosterone esters in combination with GnRH antagonists or cyproterone acetate, but had more favorable injection intervals and better efficacy. Because of its long-lasting, profound suppression of spermatogenesis and the absence of serious side-effects, the combination of TU and NETE can be considered a first choice for further studies of hormonal male contraception.