Ontology-based data integration

About: Ontology-based data integration is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 11065 publications have been published within this topic receiving 216888 citations.

OntoDM: An Ontology of Data Mining

Abstract: Motivated by the need for unification of the field of data mining and the growing demand for formalized representation of outcomes of research, we address the task of constructing an ontology of data mining. The proposed ontology, named OntoDM, is based on a recent proposal of a general framework for data mining, and includes definitions of basic data mining entities, such as datatype and dataset, data mining task, data mining algorithm and components thereof (e.g., distance function), etc. It also allows for the definition of more complex entities, e.g., constraints in constraint-based data mining, sets of such constraints (inductive queries) and data mining scenarios (sequences of inductive queries). Unlike most existing approaches to constructing ontologies of data mining, OntoDM is a deep/heavy-weight ontology and follows best practices in ontology engineering, such as not allowing multiple inheritance of classes, using a predefined set of relations and using a top level ontology.

Using ontologies for simulation modeling

Abstract: Ontological analysis has been shown to be an effective first step in the construction of robust knowledge based systems. However, the modeling and simulation community has not taken advantage of the benefits of ontology management methods and tools. Moreover, the popularity of semantic technologies and the semantic web has provided several beneficial opportunities for the modeling and simulation communities of interest. This paper describes the role of ontologies in facilitating simulation modeling. It outlines the technical challenges in distributed simulation modeling and describes how ontology-based methods may be applied to address these challenges. The paper concludes by describing an ontology-based solution framework for simulation modeling and analysis and outlining the benefits of this solution approach.

Ontology Evolution: Not the Same as Schema Evolution In: Knowledge and Information Systems

Abstract: As ontology development becomes a more ubiquitous and collaborative process, ontology versioning and evolution becomes an important area of ontology research. The many similarities between database-schema evolution and ontology evolution will allow us to build on the extensive research in schema evolution. However, there are also important differences between database schemas and ontologies. The differences stem from different usage paradigms, the presence of explicit semantics and different knowledge models. A lot of problems that existed only in theory in database research come to the forefront as practical problems in ontology evolution. These differences have important implications for the development of ontology-evolution frameworks: The traditional distinction between versioning and evolution is not applicable to ontologies. There are several dimensions along which compatibility between versions must be considered. The set of change operations for ontologies is different. We must develop automatic techniques for finding similarities and differences between versions.

The TERMINAE Method and Platform for Ontology Engineering from Texts

Abstract: Designed about ten years ago, the TERMINAE method and workbench for ontology engineering from texts have been going on evolving since then. Our investigations integrate the experience gained through its use in industrial and academic projects, the progress of natural language processing as well as the evolution of the ontology engineering. Several new methodological guidelines, such as the reuse of core ontologies, have been added to the method and implemented in the workbench. It has also been modified in order to be compliant to some recent standards such as the OWL knowledge representation. The paper recalls the terminology engineering principles underlying TERMINAE and comments its originality. Then it presents the kind of conceptual model that is built with this method, and its knowledge representation. The method and the support provided by the workbench are detailed and illustrated with a case-study in law. With regard to the state of the art, TERMINAE is one of the most supervised methods in the trend of ontology learning. This option raises epistemological issues about how language and knowledge can be articulated and the distance that separate formal ontologies from learned conceptual models.