Topic
Open-loop controller
About: Open-loop controller is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 16148 publications have been published within this topic receiving 224014 citations. The topic is also known as: non-feedback controller & open-loop control law.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: A new PID controller for resistant differential control against load disturbance is introduced that can be used for load frequency control (LFC) application and a comparison between this controller and two other prevalent PI controllers, optimized by GA and Neural Networks, has been done which represents advantages of this controller over others.
Abstract: A new PID controller for resistant differential control against load disturbance is introduced that can be used for load frequency control (LFC) application. Parameters of the controller have been specified by using imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA). Load disturbance, which is due to continuous and rapid changes of small loads, is always a problem for load frequency control of power systems. This paper introduces a new method to overcome this problem that is based on filtering technique which eliminates the effect of this kind of disturbance. The object is frequency regulation in each area of the power system and decreasing of power transfer between control areas, so the parameters of the proposed controller have been specified in a wide range of load changes by means of ICA to achieve the best dynamic response of frequency. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed controller, a three-area power system is simulated in MATLAB/SIMULINK. Each area has different generation units, so utilizes controllers with different parameters. Finally a comparison between the proposed controller and two other prevalent PI controllers, optimized by GA and Neural Networks, has been done which represents advantages of this controller over others.
287 citations
••
TL;DR: An adaptive nonlinear control strategy for a bench-scale pH neutralization system is developed and experimentally evaluated and demonstrates the superior performance of the adaptive non linear controller as compared to a non-adaptive nonlinear controller and conventional PI controller.
Abstract: An adaptive nonlinear control strategy for a bench-scale pH neutralization system is developed and experimentally evaluated. The pH process exhibits severe nonlinear and time-varying behavior and therefore cannot be adequately controlled with a conventional PI controller. The nonlinear controller design is based on a modified input-output linearization approach which accounts for the implicit output equation in the reaction invariant model. Because the reaction invariants cannot be measured online and the linearized system is unobservable, a nonlinear output feedback controller is developed by combining the input-output linearizing controller with a reduced-order, open-loop observer. The adaptive nonlinear control strategy is obtained by augmenting the non-adaptive controller with an indirect parameter estimation scheme which accounts for unmeasured buffering changes. Experimental tests demonstrate the superior performance of the adaptive nonlinear controller as compared to a non-adaptive nonlinear controller and conventional PI controller. >
285 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, an optimal output feedback controller which uses only the output state variables is proposed to resolve the difficulty of access to all the state variables of a system and also their measurement is costly and difficult.
285 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the adaptive control of a linear time-invariant plant in the presence of bounded disturbances is considered, and the adaptive controller suggested assures the boundedness of all signals in the overall system.
Abstract: The adaptive control of a linear time-invariant plant in the presence of bounded disturbances is considered. In addition to the usual assumptions made regarding the plant transfer function, it is also assumed that the high-frequency gain k p of the plant and an upper bound on the magnitude of the controller parameters are known. Under these conditions the adaptive controller suggested assures the boundedness of all signals in the overall system.
285 citations
••
TL;DR: The design principle, tracking performance, and stability analysis of a fuzzy proportional-derivative (PD) controller, derived from the conventional continuous-time linear PD controller, and the fuzzification, control-rule base, and defuzzification in the design are discussed in detail.
Abstract: This paper describes the design principle, tracking performance, and stability analysis of a fuzzy proportional-derivative (PD) controller. First, the fuzzy PD controller is derived from the conventional continuous-time linear PD controller. Then, the fuzzification, control-rule base, and defuzzification in the design of the fuzzy PD controller are discussed in detail. The resulting controller is a discrete-time fuzzy version of the conventional PD controller, which has the same linear structure in the proportional and the derivative parts but has nonconstant gains: both the proportional and derivative gains are nonlinear functions of the input signals. The new fuzzy PD controller thus preserves the simple linear structure of the conventional PD controller yet enhances its self-tuning control capability. Computer simulation results have demonstrated this advantage of the fuzzy PD controller, particularly when the process to be controlled is nonlinear. After a detailed stability analysis, where a simple and realistic sufficient condition for the bounded-input/bounded-output stability of the overall feedback control system was derived, several computer simulation results are compared with the conventional PD controller. Although the conventional and fuzzy PD controllers are not exactly comparable, the authors compare them in order to have a sense of how well the fuzzy PD controller performs. For this reason, in the simulations several first-order and second-order linear systems, with or without time-delays, are first used to test the performance of the fuzzy PD controller for step reference inputs: the fuzzy PD control systems show remarkable performance, as well as (if not better than) the conventional PD control systems. Moreover, the fuzzy PD controller is compared to the conventional PD controller for a particular second-order linear system, showing the advantage of the fuzzy PD controller over the conventional one in the sense that in order to obtain the same control performance the conventional PD controller has to employ an extremely large gain while the fuzzy controller uses a reasonably small gain. Finally, in the case of nonlinear systems, the authors provide some examples to show that the fuzzy PD controller can track the set-points satisfactorily but the conventional PD controller cannot. >
281 citations