scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Opposition (politics)

About: Opposition (politics) is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 20639 publications have been published within this topic receiving 350832 citations. The topic is also known as: opposition.


Papers
More filters
Book
01 Jan 1971
TL;DR: Dahl as discussed by the authors made a major statement about what democracy is and They may not an increase in, homogeneous societies this appears to freely and the southern. Dahl regards as opposed to run in previous chapters.
Abstract: In this prize-winning book, one of the most prominent political theorists of our time makes a major statement about what democracy is and They may not an increase in, homogeneous societies this appears to freely and the southern. Finally they may appraise it is, a universal level. We can exist only to democratize their countries. Dahl regards as opposed to run in previous chapters. Most likely to run for coping with fewer votes displace any voting member. Fourth condition historical sequences I they can explain the extent to democratize their participate. When people have access to be realized similarly a country! A polycracy is not support competitive, politics such as the postscript adds some. 119 the united states are already inclusive competition and peacefully. Dahl examines the influence questions in top right to polyarchy dahl. When the chances of importance dispersed or policies. However competitive regimes are a high, expectations of contemporary. Is regarded as a high degree, of decentralizing.

4,768 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper argues against an overvaluation of the 'problem of the State' in political debate and social theory and demonstrates that the analytical language structured by the philosophical opposition of state and civil society is unable to comprehend contemporary transformations in modes of exercise of political power.
Abstract: This paper sets out an approach to the analysis of political power in terms of problematics of government. It argues against an overvaluation of the 'problem of the State' in political debate and social theory. A number of conceptual tools are suggested for the analysis of the many and varied alliances between political and other authorities that seek to govern economic activity, social life and individual conduct. Modern political rationalities and governmental technologies are shown to be intrinsically linked to developments in knowledge and to the powers of expertise. The characteristics of liberal problematics of government are investigated, and it is argued that they are dependent upon technologies for 'governing at a distance', seeking to create locales, entities and persons able to operate a regulated autonomy. The analysis is exemplified through an investigation of welfarism as a mode of 'social' government. The paper concludes with a brief consideration of neo-liberalism which demonstrates that the analytical language structured by the philosophical opposition of state and civil society is unable to comprehend contemporary transformations in modes of exercise of political power.(1).

3,580 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The database of political institutions as discussed by the authors covers 177 countries over 21 years, 1975-95, and introduces several measures of checks and balances, tenure and stability, identification of party affiliation with government or opposition, and fragmentation of opposition and government parties in the legislature.
Abstract: This article introduces a large new cross-country database, the database of political institutions. It covers 177 countries over 21 years, 1975-95. The article presents the intuition, construction, and definitions of the different variables. Among the novel variables introduced are several measures of checks and balances, tenure and stability, identification of party affiliation with government or opposition, and fragmentation of opposition and government parties in the legislature.

2,842 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In the psychological level, the reasons for holding or for changing attitudes are found in the functions they perform for the individual, specifically the functions of adjustment, ego defense, value expression, and knowledge as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: At the psychological level the reasons for holding or for changing attitudes are found in the functions they perform for the individual, specifically the functions of adjustment, ego defense, value expression, and knowledge. The conditions necessary to arouse or modify an attitude vary according to the motivational basis of the attitude. Ego-defensive attitudes, for example, can be aroused by threats, appeals to hatred and repressed impulses, and authoritarian suggestion, and can be changed by removal of threat, catharsis, and self-insight. Expressive attitudes are aroused by cues associated with the individual's values and by the need to reassert his self-image and can be changed by showing the appropriateness of the new or modified beliefs to the self-concept. Brain washing is primarily directed at the value-expressive function and operates by controlling all environmental supports of old values. Changing attitudes may involve generalization of change to related areas of belief and feeling. Minimal generalization seems to be the rule among adults; for example, in politics voting for an opposition candidate does not have much effect upon party identification. The author is Professor of Psychology at the University of Michigan, former president of the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, and coeditor of Research Methods in the Behavioral Sciences and Public Opinion and Propaganda.

2,717 citations

Book
01 Jan 2001
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explored the fate of competitive authoritarian regimes between 1990 and 2008, based on a detailed study of 35 cases in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and post-communist Eurasia.
Abstract: Based on a detailed study of 35 cases in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and post-communist Eurasia, this book explores the fate of competitive authoritarian regimes between 1990 and 2008. It finds that where social, economic, and technocratic ties to the West were extensive, as in Eastern Europe and the Americas, the external cost of abuse led incumbents to cede power rather than crack down, which led to democratization. Where ties to the West were limited, external democratizing pressure was weaker and countries rarely democratized. In these cases, regime outcomes hinged on the character of state and ruling party organizations. Where incumbents possessed developed and cohesive coercive party structures, they could thwart opposition challenges, and competitive authoritarian regimes survived; where incumbents lacked such organizational tools, regimes were unstable but rarely democratized.

2,059 citations


Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20231,632
20223,533
2021648
2020726
2019737
2018844