scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Organizational identification

About: Organizational identification is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 1988 publications have been published within this topic receiving 97047 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed whether academics' organizational cynicism attitudes and levels of organizational identification differ based on certain variables and determine if any relationship exists between these two variables and found that negative and moderately significant correlations were found between all subdimensions of organization cynicism attitude and cognitive/behavioral/affective organizational identification sub-dimensions, however, significant differences were found in terms of sufficiency of institution's physical facilities, the status of place where the institution is located and financial aid from the institution.
Abstract: This study aims to analyze whether academics’ organizational cynicism attitudes and levels of organizational identification in the field of sports sciences differ based on certain variables and determine if any relationship exists between these two variables. “Organizational Cynicism Scale” and “Academics’ Organizational Cynicism Scale” were applied to 106 academics as a data collection tool. Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal Wallis test were used for nonparametric statistical data analysis. Bonferroni correction was taken into account in order to identify different groups. Spearman order correlation coefficient was calculated in order to identify the correlations among variables. The findings suggest that academics’ organizational cynicism and identification sub-dimensions did not display significant differences in terms of gender, marital status and academic title. However, significant differences were found among some sub-dimensions in terms of sufficiency of institution’s physical facilities, the status of place where the institution is located and financial aid from the institution. Additionally, negative and moderately significant correlations were found between all sub-dimensions of organization cynicism attitude and cognitive/behavioral/affective organizational identification sub-dimensions. It is considered that the present study will make important contributions to educational psychology thanks to its findings.

4 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Nov 2022-Heliyon
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors employed social exchange theory and social identity theory to analyze the correlations between employees' perceptions of socially responsible HRM, organizational identification, and job performance, and found that HRM that is perceived to be socially responsible positively influences organizational identification and job performances.

4 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Lim et al. as mentioned in this paper studied the effects of organizational identification on the organizational phase and relative depletion of beauticians in the Korean Institute of Dermatological Sciences (KIDS).
Abstract: Copyright c Korea Institute of Dermatological Sciences. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Effects of Organizational Identification on Organizational Phase and Relative Deprivation of Beauticians Yun-Kyung Lim, Eunjun Park Department of Beauty Arts, Seokyeong University, Seoul, Korea

4 citations

01 Jun 2001
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that human behavior in organizations, like all other human behavior, is driven by self-interest, and hence appropriate mechanisms are required to link that selfinterest, expressed in the profit motive, to broader social goals and needs.
Abstract: In recent years, there has been much criticism of organizations in general and governmental organizations in particular. Economists (and others) argue that human behavior in organizations, like all other human behavior, is driven by self-interest, and hence appropriate mechanisms are required to link that self-interest, expressed in the profit motive, to broader social goals and needs. The only effective mechanisms for achieving this linkage, their argument continues, arc economic markets, Adam Smiths "invisible hand." For this reason, it is said, the activities of society aimed at satisfying its economic needs, as well as its needs for public order and for various kinds of public goods and services, should be satisfied, to the maximum degree possible, through privately owned business firms operating in competitive markets. Privatization is the target to be aimed at. I find this argument badly flawed. First, its major motivational premise is simply false. Human beings make most of their decisions, not in terms of individual self-interest, but in terms of the perceived interests of the groups, families, organizations, ethnic groups, and national states with which they identify and to whom they are loyal. The "invisible hand" is attached much more strongly to organizational identification than to a more narrowly defined self-interest. As a consequence, the belief that the profit motive is the only reliable motive for welding organizational actions to social needs is wrong. What is essential to make the weld is that organizations must use only those resources that they can induce society (through the market or through democratic processes) to appropriate to them in exchange for their services. Second, if identification, and not economic self-interest in the narrower sense, is the driving motive in organizational behavior, then the argument that privatization will always (or even usually) increase productivity and efficiency is equally wrong. Such empirical evidence as we have on the relative efficiency of private and public organizations shows no consistent superiority of one over the other. It does show consistent and predictable inefficiencies of organizations when they arc not subjected to the discipline of the na in their external dealings (for example, in conditions of monopoly, or when subsidies are available and manipulable). And evidence also shows that the goals of organizations will be strongly influenced by the sources of their revenues and by the ways in winch their productivity is measured. Of course, it is not enough that a society work efficiently and productively, We also expect a society to distribute goods and services fairly, however vigorously we may debate and disagree about the criteria of fairness. …

4 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Organizational commitment
33K papers, 1.5M citations
87% related
Job performance
23.2K papers, 1.1M citations
85% related
Organizational learning
32.6K papers, 1.6M citations
85% related
Corporate social responsibility
45.5K papers, 1M citations
84% related
Competitive advantage
46.6K papers, 1.5M citations
83% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202377
2022205
2021146
2020151
2019152
2018139