scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers on "Orientation column published in 1967"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Observations of the effect of such stimulations on unit activity in the lateral geniculate nucleus suggest that inferotemporal cortex excitation alters the configuration of the receptive field while frontal cortex stimulation influences the background activity of the unit.

100 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
06 Jan 1967-Science
TL;DR: It is seen in this study that retinal lesions of the fovea and adjacent parafovea produce a more severe drop in acuity than corresponding cortical lesions, and therefore the surprisingly slight effects of the latter cannot be explained in terms of a relatively higher parfoveal acuity in the monkey.
Abstract: Acuity falls sharply and predictably in man as fixation is shifted away from the test stimulus. If the same "eccentricity" function applies to the monkey, then it can be shown that striate cortex lesions produce a smaller acuity impairment than is predicted by electrophysiological maps of the projection of retina onto the cortex. It is seen in this study that retinal lesions of the fovea and adjacent parafovea produce a more severe drop in acuity than corresponding cortical lesions, and therefore the surprisingly slight effects of the latter cannot be explained in terms of a relatively higher parafoveal acuity in the monkey. The discrepancy between retinal and cortical effects is unlikely to be due to the development of "supersensitivity" at the edge of the cortical lesions. An explanation is proposed in terms of lateral spread of information at retinal and/or geniculate stages of the visual system.

62 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
27 May 1967-Nature
TL;DR: It is shown that, in the rabbit, retinal ganglion cells1, geniculate cells2,3 and midbrain cells4 respond most readily to special aspects of light stimulation related to movement, while in the cat, these peripheral systems respond most effectively to an alteration of intensity of a stationary light spot.
Abstract: IT has been shown that, in the rabbit, retinal ganglion cells1, geniculate cells2,3 and midbrain cells4 respond most readily to special aspects of light stimulation related to movement. In the cat5–7, by contrast, these peripheral systems respond most effectively to an alteration of intensity of a stationary light spot, and have their receptive fields concentrically arranged with “on-centres and off-surrounds” (or vice versa). In the rabbit, on the other hand, the shape and organization of peripheral receptive fields are less stereotyped.

30 citations