scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Plagiarism detection

About: Plagiarism detection is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 1790 publications have been published within this topic receiving 24740 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results of this study indicate that the effect of nazief-adriani stemmer on the winnowing algorithm is superior to the stemmer porter, only decreasing the detection performance of the 0.28% similarity value while the Porter stemmer is superior in increasing the processing time to 69% faster.
Abstract: Current technological developments change physical paper patterns into digital, and this has a very high impact. Positive impact because paper waste is reduced, on the other hand, the rampant copying of digital data raises the amount of plagiarism that is increasing. At present, there are many efforts made by experts to overcome the problem of plagiarism, one of which is by utilizing the winnowing algorithm as a tool to detect plagiarism data. In its development, many optimizing winnowing algorithms used stemming techniques. The most widely used stemmer algorithms include stemmer porter and nazief-adriani. However, there has not been a discussion on the comparison of the effect of performance using stemmer on the winnowing algorithm in measuring the value of plagiarism. So it is necessary to research the effect of stemmer algorithms on winnowing algorithms so that the results of plagiarism detection are more optimal. The results of this study indicate that the effect of nazief-adriani stemmer on the winnowing algorithm is superior to the stemmer porter, only decreasing the detection performance of the 0.28% similarity value while the Porter stemmer is superior in increasing the processing time to 69% faster.

11 citations

Proceedings Article
23 May 2016
TL;DR: This resource is the first of its kind developed for the Urdu language and it is believed that it will be a valuable contribution to the evaluation of paraphrase plagiarism detection systems.
Abstract: Paraphrase plagiarism is a significant and widespread problem and research shows that it is hard to detect. Several methods and automatic systems have been proposed to deal with it. However, evaluation and comparison of such solutions is not possible because of the unavailability of benchmark corpora with manual examples of paraphrase plagiarism. To deal with this issue, we present the novel development of a paraphrase plagiarism corpus containing simulated (manually created) examples in the Urdu language - a language widely spoken around the world. This resource is the first of its kind developed for the Urdu language and we believe that it will be a valuable contribution to the evaluation of paraphrase plagiarism detection systems.

11 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
03 Feb 2020
TL;DR: Two case studies are presented that explore how resilient current source code plagiarism detection tools are to plagiarism-hiding transformations and an evaluation of a new advanced technique that indicates the technique is robust in its ability to identify the same program after it has been transformed.
Abstract: Source code plagiarism is a persistent problem in undergraduate computer science education. Unfortunately, it is a widespread phenomena with many students plagiarising either because they are unwilling or incapable of completing their own work. Many source code plagiarism detection tools have been proposed to identify suspected cases of source code plagiarism. However, these tools are not resilient to pervasive plagiarism-hiding transformations that significantly change the structure of source code. In this paper, two case studies are presented that explore how resilient current source code plagiarism detection tools are to plagiarism-hiding transformations. Furthermore, an evaluation of a new advanced technique for source code plagiarism detection is presented to show that is it possible to identify pervasive cases of source code plagiarism. The results of this evaluation indicate the technique is robust in its ability to identify the same program after it has been transformed.

11 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An introduction to plagiarism and the numerous negative aspects associated with it is provided and it is believed that building awareness in the people about plagiarism outcomes is more important than teaching them about the different methodologies used for detection.
Abstract: This article provides an introduction to plagiarism and the numerous negative aspects associated with it. Some examples from history have also been provided along with their outcomes. There are different types of plagiarism with varying legal and social aspects. The taxonomy of plagiarism is built by classifying it, with respect to the method involved in plagiarism, the form in which it happens or the intention of the plagiarist. The strategies suggested in the literature to avoid plagiarism are organized into individual and organizational levels. Individuals can adopt strategies to build habits of avoiding plagiarism and focus on their original and innovative way of thinking. Similarly, institutions can make policies to cope with plagiarism and hence maintain their reputation. In this paper, the focus is not on mentioning the plagiarism detection methods; rather we believe that building awareness in the people about plagiarism outcomes is more important than teaching them about the different methodologies used for detection. Some students avoid plagiarism detection as if playing a game and it can be only avoided by educating them in ethics.

11 citations

01 Jan 2014
TL;DR: In this paper, a sampling survey approach employing questionnaires and interviews was used to collect data from a total of 200 Gombe State University students (Nigeria), and the results of the interviews showed that 90% of students have plagiarized at one time in the past, 68% included textbooks and other sources in the bibliography of assignment s, out of which 50% had written books that they didn't even consult.
Abstract: Academic dishonesty, especially plagiarism, is a global problem that has bedevilled the academia. It is regarded as unethical and immoral intellectual thievery that could negatively impact on not only the repute of an academic institution, but the prosperi ty of a society. This study was designed to investigate student’s awareness and indulgence in plagiarism and their perception of punishment towards Plagiarists. Towards this end, a sampling survey approach employing questionnaires and interviews was used to collect data from a total of 200 Gombe State University students (Nigeria). The result of the interviews showed that 90% of students have plagiarized at one time in the past, 68% have included textbooks and other sources in the bibliography of assignment s, out of which 50% had written books that they didn’t even consult. The data from questionnaires showed that the proportion of students whose awareness of plagiarism was partial (63%) and those completely unaware (20%) were higher than those (17%) aware of it. Further, the data showed that the majority of students plagiarize from the Internet (90%) and when asked about whether it would be fair to punish Plagiarists, 42% of students disagreed. Generally, this appears to confirm other reports about the incidence of plagiarism in the academia and pinpoints under awareness as its major cause. Hence, this calls for a campaign to increase students’ awareness of plagiarism and its ethical and moral implications; the need for plagiarism detection tools and developm ent of more strict measures for Plagiarists.

11 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Active learning
42.3K papers, 1.1M citations
78% related
The Internet
213.2K papers, 3.8M citations
77% related
Software development
73.8K papers, 1.4M citations
77% related
Graph (abstract data type)
69.9K papers, 1.2M citations
76% related
Deep learning
79.8K papers, 2.1M citations
76% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202359
2022126
202183
2020118
2019130
2018125