scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Plural

About: Plural is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 5851 publications have been published within this topic receiving 76098 citations. The topic is also known as: plurative & pl.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In contrast to conventional approaches that view market and hierarchy as mutually exclusive control mechanisms (or as poles of a continuum), the authors argue that price, authority, and trust are independent and can be combined in a variety of ways.
Abstract: This review article focuses on the three control mechanisms that govern economic transactions between actors: price, authority, and trust. In contrast to conventional approaches that view market and hierarchy as mutually exclusive control mechanisms (or as poles of a continuum), we argue that price, authority, and trust are independent and can be combined in a variety of ways. For instance, price and authority are often played off each other within firms, while trust and price are sometimes intertwined to control transactions between firms. We also identify a type of organization largely ignored in the literature: the plural form. In the plural form, organizations simultaneously operate distinct control mechanisms for the same function. For example, organizations operate franchises and company-owned units under the same trademark, and companies sometimes make and buy the same part. To understand this form, the analytic focus must move from individual transactions to the broader architecture of control mec...

2,193 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Aug 1958-WORD
TL;DR: This paper found that children do have knowledge of morphological rules, and that this knowledge evolves from simple, regular rules to more irregular and qualified rules that are adequate fully to describe English.
Abstract: In this study we set out to discover what is learned by children exposed to English morphology. To test for knowledge of morphological rules, we use nonsense materials. We know that if the subject can supply the correct plural ending, for instance, to a noun we have made up, he has internalized a working system of the plural allomorphs in English, and is able to generalize to new cases and select the right form. If a child knows that the plural of witch is witches, he may simply have memorized the plural form. If, however, he tells us that the plural of * gutch is * gutches, we have evidence that he actually knows, albeit unconsciously, one of those rules which the descriptive linguist, too, would set forth in his grammar. And if children do have knowledge of morphological rules, how does this knowledge evolve? Is there a progression from simple, regular rules to the more irregular and qualified rules that are adequate fully to describe English? In very general terms, we undertake to discover the psychological status of a certain kind of linguistic description. It is evident that the acquisition of language is more than the storing up of rehearsed utterances, since we are all able to say what we have not practiced and what we have never before heard. In bringing descriptive linguistics to the study of language acquisition, we hope to gain knowledge of the systems and patterns used by the speaker. In order to test for children's knowledge of this sort, it was necessary to begin with an examination of their actual vocabulary. Accordingly, the 1000 most frequent words in the first-grader's vocabulary were selected from Rinsland's listing. This listing

1,854 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a crosslinguistic analysis of argumental bare nominal arguments is presented, in which determinerless NPs are assumed to occur in canonical argumental positions.
Abstract: This paper is devoted to the study of bare nominal arguments (i.e., determinerless NPs occurring in canonical argumental positions) from a crosslinguistic point of view. It is proposed that languages may vary in what they let their NPs denote. In some languages (like Chinese), NPs are argumental (names of kinds) and can thus occur freely without determiner in argument position; in others they are predicates (Romance), and this prevents NPs from occurring as arguments, unless the category D(eterminer) is projected. Finally, there are languages (like Germanic or Slavic) which allow both predicative and argumental NPs; these languages, being the ‘union’ of the previous two types, are expected to behave like Romance for certain aspects of their nominal system (the singular count portion) and like Chinese for others (the mass and plural portions). This hypothesis (the ‘Nominal Mapping Parameter’) is investigated not just through typological considerations, but also through a detailed contrastive analysis of bare arguments in Germanic (English) vs. Romance (Italian). Some general consequences of this view, which posits a limited variation in the mapping from syntax into semantics, for current theories of Universal Grammar and acquisition are considered.

1,332 citations

Book
01 Jan 1977

965 citations

Book
01 Jan 2000
TL;DR: In this paper, the singular plural of being singular plural has been used to describe war, right, sovereignty - Techne 3. Eulogy for the Mele e 4. The surprice of the event 5. Human excess 6.
Abstract: Preface 1. Of being singular plural 2. War, right, sovereignty - Techne 3. Eulogy for the Mele e 4. The surprice of the event 5. Human excess 6. Cosmos Baselius Notes.

886 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Sentence
41.2K papers, 929.6K citations
79% related
Ideology
54.2K papers, 1.1M citations
78% related
Narrative
64.2K papers, 1.1M citations
78% related
Vocabulary
44.6K papers, 941.5K citations
75% related
Politics
263.7K papers, 5.3M citations
75% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023426
20221,025
2021189
2020208
2019197
2018226