scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers on "Polyamine binding published in 2004"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The effects of the C-terminus on aggregation cannot be rationalized merely by a contribution to the protein net charge, but rather suggest a specific role of aa109-140 in the regulation of aggregation, presumably involving formation of intramolecular contacts.
Abstract: The aggregation of alpha-synuclein, involved in the pathogenesis of several neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson's disease, is enhanced in vitro by biogenic polyamines binding to the highly charged C-terminal region aa109-140. In this study, we investigated the influence of this region on the aggregation kinetics, monitored by thioflavin T binding and static light scattering, and morphology, assessed by electron microscopy, fluorescence microscopy, and turbidity, by comparing the effect of various solution conditions on the wild-type protein, the disease related mutants A53T and A30P, and two truncated variants, syn(1-108) and syn(1-124), lacking the complete or the C-terminal half of the polyamine binding site. In the presence of the intact C-terminus, aggregation was strongly retarded in physiological buffer. This inhibition of aggregation was overridden by (i) addition of spermine or MgCl(2) or lowering of pH, leading to strong charge shielding in the C-terminus or (ii) by truncation of aa125-140 or aa109-140. Addition of MgCl(2) or spermine or acidification were not effective in promoting aggregation of syn(1-108). The impact of the disease-related mutations on the aggregation kinetics was dependent on the solution conditions, with the aggregation propensity order A53T approximately wt > A30P at low ionic strength, but A53T > wt approximately A30P at high ionic strength, with exceedingly potent promotion of aggregation by the A53T mutation in the presence of spermine. In contrast to full-length alpha-synuclein aggregates, those formed from syn(1-108) did not exhibit a pronounced polymorphism. The effects of the C-terminus on aggregation cannot be rationalized merely by a contribution to the protein net charge, but rather suggest a specific role of aa109-140 in the regulation of aggregation, presumably involving formation of intramolecular contacts.

331 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is concluded that the C‐terminal domain acts as a regulator of α‐synuclein aggregation and is correlated with increased affinity and enhancement of fibrillation, for which a simple kinetic mechanism involving a dimeric nucleation center is proposed.
Abstract: The aggregation of α-synuclein is characteristic of Parkinson's disease (PD) and other neurodegenerative synucleinopathies. The 140-aa protein is natively unstructured; thus, ligands binding to the monomeric form are of therapeutic interest. Biogenic polyamines promote the aggregation of α-synuclein and may constitute endogenous agents modulating the pathogenesis of PD. We characterized the complexes of natural and synthetic polyamines with α-synuclein by NMR and assigned the binding site to C-terminal residues 109–140. Dissociation constants were derived from chemical shift perturbations. Greater polyamine charge (+2 → +5) correlated with increased affinity and enhancement of fibrillation, for which we propose a simple kinetic mechanism involving a dimeric nucleation center. According to the analysis, polyamines increase the extent of nucleation by ~$10^4$ and the rate of monomer addition ~40-fold. Significant secondary structure is not induced in monomeric α-synuclein by polyamines at 15°C. Instead, NMR reveals changes in a region (aa 22–93) far removed from the polyamine binding site and presumed to adopt the β-sheet conformation characteristic of fibrillar α-synuclein. We conclude that the C-terminal domain acts as a regulator of α-synuclein aggregation.

240 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Insight is provided into different modes of α-synuclein self-assembly and identifies key factors modulating the aggregation process, providing evidence for the potential of amyloid fibril surfaces to act as nucleation sites in amorphous aggregation.

151 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The interplay between polyamine binding and local DNA structure is analyzed by investigating how and if the minor groove width of DNA depends on the presence and dynamics of the counterions.
Abstract: Four different molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have been performed for infinitely long ordered DNA molecules with different counterions, namely the two natural polyamines spermidine(3+) (Spd3+) and putrescine(2+) (Put2+), the synthetic polyamine diaminopropane(2+) (DAP2+), and the simple monovalent cation Na+. All systems comprised a periodical hexagonal cell with three identical DNA decamers, 15 water molecules per nucleotide, and counterions balancing the DNA charge. The simulation setup mimics the DNA state in oriented DNA fibers, previously studied using NMR and other experimental methods. In this paper the interplay between polyamine binding and local DNA structure is analyzed by investigating how and if the minor groove width of DNA depends on the presence and dynamics of the counterions. The results of the MD simulations reveal principal differences in the polyamine–DNA interactions between the natural [spermine(4+), Spd3+, Put2+] and the synthetic (DAP2+) polyamines.

29 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A physical model for the blocking action of polyamines is proposed that incorporates the most recent structural information determined for Kir channels and is based on the leading amine group of D9 and the negative ring of charges at E224 and E299.
Abstract: Two recent papers published in the Journal of General Physiology (Guo and Lu, 2003; Guo et al., 2003) address the mechanism of inward rectification by polyamines in Kir2.1 channels. In these two papers, Guo et al. (2003) extensively analyze channel block by monoamines, diamines (DAs), and polyamines of varying length and charge, using thermodynamic mutant cycles to calculate interaction energies of these compounds with acidic residues in the channel. Based on their findings, a physical model for the blocking action of polyamines is proposed that incorporates the most recent structural information determined for Kir channels. We write to suggest a different and, in our view, more plausible physical interpretation, which we believe better reconciles their results with previous electrophysiological as well as structural findings (Pearson and Nichols, 1998; Kubo and Murata, 2001; Xie et al., 2002, 2003; Chang et al., 2003; Kuo et al., 2003). DAs are alkyl chains with positively charged amine groups at each end, whereas polyamines such as spermidine and spermine have amine groups at both ends and interspersed within. In their model, Guo et al. (2003) propose that when intracellular DAs or polyamines enter the pore, the leading amine group first interacts with a ring of negative charges formed by E224 and E299 in the cytoplasmic pore, occluding the ion-conducting pathway with a shallow voltage dependence. The leading amine then moves deeper into the transmembrane pore toward the negative charge at D172, with the trailing amine group remaining stabilized by an electrostatic interaction with E224 and E299. They postulate that as the alkyl chain length of the DA increases, the leading amine approaches more closely to D172, displacing more K ions from the pore and thereby increasing the voltage dependence of block. For DAs, this effect plateaus at a chain length of nine alkyl groups (DA9), which is also the DA length at which the interaction energy (relative to DA2) peaks with respect to the D172N mutant. Although this schema explains their findings from the biophysical standpoint, a problem arises when the recent structural information is considered. From the crystal structure of closed KirBac1.1 (Kuo et al., 2003), the distance between D172 and E224/E299 is ∼35 A, whereas DA9 has a total extended length of only ∼12 A. Assuming similar dimensions for Kir2.1, then if the leading amine of DA9 binds close at D172 (as required for it to sweep K ions from the transmembrane pore), then its trailing amine would be some 23 A away from E224 and E299. To rationalize this distance problem, Guo et al. (2003) hypothesize a long-range electrostatic interaction between the trailing amine group of D9 and the negative ring of charges at E224 and E299, so that the actual position of the trailing amine is only 12 A or so from D172. Thus, longer or shorter DA cannot be as effectively stabilized with their leading amine close to D172 to sweep K ions from the pore. We suggest that an alternative scenario for polyamine binding is equivalently consistent with the biophysical evidence, but, in our view, more compatible with available structural information (Fig. 1) and previous observations by other investigators (Pearson and Nichols, 1998; Kubo and Murata, 2001; Xie et al., 2002, 2003; Chang et al., 2003). This model was previously suggested for Kir6.2 (Phillips and Nichols, 2003) and Kir3 (Dibb et al., 2003) channels as well as Kir2.1 channels (Chang et al., 2003), and is based on the leading amine group of the DA or polyamine first occluding the pore when it interacts electrostatically with D172 in the transmembrane pore, rather than at E224/E299. The leading amine then moves deeper toward the selectivity filter (SF), thereby displacing K ions from the pore, whereas the trailing amine is stabilized by electrostatic interaction with D172. The distance between I138 (D172 in Kir2.1) and V111 (V143 in Kir2.1), which is just at the intracellular side of the SF signature sequence (GYG) in KirBac1.1, is estimated at ∼12 A, which matches almost exactly the length of DA9 (∼12 A). This explains why the interaction energy peaks for DA9, and falls off for longer or shorter DAs. For example, if the extracellular movement of the leading amine group of DA12 (length ∼16 A) is physically obstructed by the SF, then its alkyl chain will be too long for the trailing amine to interact as effectively with D172. Like DA9, spermidine (∼11 A) has a nearly ideal length for its leading and trailing amine groups to bind between D172 and the SF. Spermine (∼16 A) is too long for the leading and trailing amine groups to fit between D172 and the SF, but the distance between its leading and third amine groups, which is the same as spermidine, is optimal. The middle amine groups in spermine appear to further increase its stability in the pore, because its interaction energy was higher than any of the DAs. If, as originally postulated by Pearson and Nichols (1998) and later supported by Guo et al. (2003) as well as by our findings (Xie et al., 2002, 2003), the voltage dependence of polyamine block arises chiefly from the polyamines displacing K ions from the pore, then the similar effective valences for DA9, spermidine, and spermine can also be readily explained in this model, based on the following assumptions: (a) that the transmembrane voltage field is centered near the SF and K binding sites (such that the initial blocked state has a shallow voltage dependence); (b) it is primarily the leading amine group of DA9, spermidine, or spermine that electrostatically repels K ions and sweeps them from their binding sites between D172 and external side of the SF. The trailing amine groups of DA9, spermidine, or spermine would have little effect on valence, since they are for the most part located outside of the transmembrane voltage field, and do not contribute greatly to K ion displacement. Figure 1. Model of inward rectification. Structural model of the closed KirBac1.1 channel, outlining the transmembrane and cytoplasmic pore regions. For comparison with channel pore dimensions, DA4, DA9, DA12, and spermine (SPM) are shown from left to right as ... In this model, the lower valence of monoamines (including M9) occurs for the following reason: if the monoamine enters the pore with its uncharged nonpolar end leading, so that its trailing amine group interacts electrostatically with D172, then the nonpolar end will be less effective at repelling K ions near the SF. Conversely, if its amine group leads and it penetrates past D172 then the trailing nonpolar end cannot electrostatically stabilize the monoamine at D172, and the leading amine group will not penetrate as deeply toward the SF to repel K ions. In contrast, in their model, Guo et al. (2003) must postulate that monoamines can only enter the pore in the energetically less favorable orientation with the nonpolar end leading The orientation of DAs in the pore between the D172 and the SF that we propose here is compatible, unlike the model proposed by Guo et al. (2003), with the considerable evidence that polyamines can bind to the negative ring of charges at E224 and E299 without occluding the pore (Kubo and Murata, 2001; Xie et al., 2002, 2003; Chang et al., 2003). We (Xie et al., 2003) have presented evidence that DAs and polyamines of length ≥8 alkyl groups bind efficiently to the negative charges at E224 and E299 in the cytoplasmic pore without occluding the ion permeation pathway. This conclusion was based on the observation that DAs and polyamines with ≥8 alkyl groups were effective at reducing single-channel conductance over a wide range of voltage, which we attributed to reduction of net negative surface charge in the cytoplasmic pore. The distance between E224 and E299 on adjacent subunits, estimated from the Kir3.1 cytoplasmic structure, is 9.2 A, which corresponds closely to the length of DA8 (9.5 A). Thus, we postulated that initial binding of DAs and polyamines longer than 9 A, at E224 and E299 prepositions them in the wide (7–15 A) cytoplasmic pore, facilitating their access to the pore-blocking site at D172. In our model, this accounts for the kinetically rapid component of pore block, while the slow component is due to diffusion of untethered polyamines into the pore. This role of the negative charge ring in the cytoplasmic pore is consistent with the findings of Guo et al. (2003) that the alkyl chain length had no effect on the low interaction energy between DAs and E224 or E299. (We agree with their interpretation that the higher interaction energy of spermine with E224 or E299 compared with diamines is likely due to the additional amines in spermine acting as pseudodivalent cations.) In summary, we believe that the model of polyamine block proposed by Guo et al. (2003) is difficult to reconcile with all available structural and electrophysiological data. A caveat, of course, is that the structure of open Kir2.1 channels is not yet available to settle definitively which interpretation is correct. In addition, there are also controversies about the biophysical analyses (Ishihara and Ehara, 2004). Nevertheless, based on the available information, we agree fully with the comment by Stanfield and Sutcliffe (2003) in their accompanying editorial noting “how exquisitely well the channel and spermine match each other”, in the sense that our current best estimates of the distances between D172 and the SF, and between E224 and E299 on adjacent subunits in Kir2.1 appear to be exquisitely matched to the dimensions of the key biomolecules that cooperate synergistically to facilitate inward rectification so efficiently.

26 citations