scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Primate

About: Primate is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 1250 publications have been published within this topic receiving 67388 citations. The topic is also known as: the primate order & primates.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The consistencies in the pattern of subcortical projections across prosimian primates, New World monkeys, and Old World monkeys support the concept that DM is a visual area common to all primates and provide further evidence for proposed subdivisions of the inferior pulvinar.
Abstract: The dorsomedial visual area (DM) of owl monkeys is a cortical area that has been described recently in a range of primate species. To study the thalamic connections of this area, injections of several distinguishable neuroanatomical tracers were placed into DM in galagos, owl monkeys, squirrel monkeys, and macaque monkeys. The distribution of label was remarkably consistent across these diverse primate species. Labeled connections were densest within the pulvinar complex. Both the lateral and inferior divisions of the pulvinar, but not the medial division, had connections with DM. Within the inferior pulvinar of monkeys, central lateral and central medial nuclei had dense connections, and the medial and posterior nuclei had sparse connections with DM. Sparser connections were revealed in the lateral geniculate nucleus and the nucleus limitans. Anterograde label was also found in the superior colliculus. The consistencies in the pattern of subcortical projections across prosimian primates, New World monkeys, and Old World monkeys support the concept that DM is a visual area common to all primates. In addition, these results provide further evidence for proposed subdivisions of the inferior pulvinar.

38 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results suggest that the disorganized subfield maps and robust binocular suppression of amblyopic V2 neurons are likely to adversely affect the higher stages of cortical processing resulting in position uncertainty and image distortion.
Abstract: Experiencing different quality images in the two eyes soon after birth can cause amblyopia, a developmental vision disorder Amblyopic humans show the reduced capacity for judging the relative position of a visual target in reference to nearby stimulus elements (position uncertainty) and often experience visual image distortion Although abnormal pooling of local stimulus information by neurons beyond striate cortex (V1) is often suggested as a neural basis of these deficits, extrastriate neurons in the amblyopic brain have rarely been studied using microelectrode recording methods The receptive field (RF) of neurons in visual area V2 in normal monkeys is made up of multiple subfields that are thought to reflect V1 inputs and are capable of encoding the spatial relationship between local stimulus features We created primate models of anisometropic amblyopia and analyzed the RF subfield maps for multiple nearby V2 neurons of anesthetized monkeys by using dynamic two-dimensional noise stimuli and reverse correlation methods Unlike in normal monkeys, the subfield maps of V2 neurons in amblyopic monkeys were severely disorganized: subfield maps showed higher heterogeneity within each neuron as well as across nearby neurons Amblyopic V2 neurons exhibited robust binocular suppression and the strength of the suppression was positively correlated with the degree of hereogeneity and the severity of amblyopia in individual monkeys Our results suggest that the disorganized subfield maps and robust binocular suppression of amblyopic V2 neurons are likely to adversely affect the higher stages of cortical processing resulting in position uncertainty and image distortion

38 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The first records of turning forces for vertebrate quadrupeds, much less primates, are recorded, and hindlimb dominance in weight support characterizes both species (and primates in general), but it is more pronounced in the lemurs.
Abstract: SUMMARY In an attempt to characterize more fully the variation in substrate reaction forces in the locomotor repertoire of primates, we recorded the forces involved in directional changes for two species. These are the first records of turning forces for vertebrate quadrupeds, much less primates. Three ring-tailed lemurs and two patas monkeys performed turns of approximately 30° as they crossed a force platform. The ring-tailed lemurs also turned on a horizontal branch-like support with a segment attached to the force transducer. Mediolateral forces of up to 40% body weight were recorded. These are considerably higher than during linear locomotion. Pivot limbs in ground turns and turns on the branch differed in the lemurs, suggesting that substrate influences turning strategies. Limbs encountered both medial and lateral reaction forces, and as a result, they may be exposed to variable bending regimes in the frontal plane. The stereotypy in bending regimes suggested by in vivo bone strain studies, therefore, may characterize linear locomotion only. The lemurs showed hindlimb dominance in turns, both in terms of frequency used as well as force magnitude (hindlimb steering). Hindlimb dominance in weight support characterizes both species (and primates in general), but it is more pronounced in the lemurs. In the patas monkeys, forces were more evenly distributed among the two pairs of limbs. The mediolateral turning forces therefore seem to track the amount of weight to be shifted sideways. Overall variance in mediolateral forces was greater in the arboreal and versatile lemurs than in the terrestrial and cursorial patas monkeys.

38 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Assessment of age and diet effects on locomotor activity in female rhesus monkeys found that in some older groups, heavier monkeys tended to show greater activity, but in younger groups the opposite pattern was observed.
Abstract: As a component of a long-term, longitudinal study of aging in this primate model, the objective of the current experiment was to assess age and diet effects on locomotor activity in a cross-sectional analysis. By attaching a motion detection device to the home cage, locomotor activity was monitored over a week in a group ( N 5 47) of female rhesus monkeys ( Macaca mulatta ) 6‐26 yrs of age. About half these monkeys composed a control group fed a nutritionally fortified diet near ad libitum levels, whereas an experimental group had been fed the same diet at levels 30% less than comparable control levels for approximately 5 yrs prior to testing. Among control monkeys, a marked age-related decline in activity was noted when total activity was considered and also when diurnal and nocturnal periods of activity were analyzed separately. When comparing activity levels between control and experimental groups, only one significant diet effect was noted, which was in the youngest group of monkeys (6‐8 yrs of age) during the diurnal period. Monkeys in the experimental group exhibited reduced activity compared to controls. Body weight was not consistently correlated to activity levels. In some older groups, heavier monkeys tended to show greater activity, but in younger groups the opposite pattern was observed.

38 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Sep 2014
TL;DR: Four traditional and four more recent histological markers applied to brain sections of V1 and adjoining secondary visual cortex in macaque monkeys, chimpanzees, and humans in order to compare identifiable layers and sublayers in both cortical areas across these species support the conclusion that the most popular scheme of V 1 lamination misidentifies subl layers of layer 3 as sublayer of layer 4.
Abstract: The layers and sublayers of primary visual cortex, or V1, in primates are easily distinguishable compared to those in other cortical areas, and are especially distinct in anthropoid primates - monkeys, apes, and humans - where they also vary in histological appearance. This variation in primate-specific specialization has led to a longstanding confusion over the identity of layer 4 and its proposed sublayers in V1. As the application of different histological markers relate to the issue of defining and identifying layers and sublayers, we applied four traditional and four more recent histological markers to brain sections of V1 and adjoining secondary visual cortex (V2) in macaque monkeys, chimpanzees, and humans in order to compare identifiable layers and sublayers in both cortical areas across these species. The use of Nissl, neuronal nuclear antigen (NeuN), Gallyas myelin, cytochrome oxidase (CO), acetylcholinesterase (AChE), nonphosphorylated neurofilament H (SMI-32), parvalbumin (PV), and vesicular glutamate transporter 2 (VGLUT2) preparations support the conclusion that the most popular scheme of V1 lamination, that of Brodmann, misidentifies sublayers of layer 3 (3Bβ and 3C) as sublayers of layer 4 (4A and 4B), and that the specialized sublayer of layer 3 in monkeys, 3Bβ, is not present in humans. These differences in interpretation are important as they relate to the proposed functions of layer 4 in primate species, where layer 4 of V1 is a layer that receives and processes information from the visual thalamus, and layer 3 is a layer that transforms and distributes information to other cortical areas.

38 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Offspring
26.6K papers, 874.3K citations
76% related
Animal ecology
30.8K papers, 1M citations
76% related
Visual cortex
18.8K papers, 1.2M citations
76% related
Foraging
19.8K papers, 708.7K citations
76% related
Natural selection
9.2K papers, 659.9K citations
76% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023296
2022585
202133
202033
201930
201842