scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Process modeling

About: Process modeling is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 11639 publications have been published within this topic receiving 223996 citations. The topic is also known as: process simulation.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper introduces an efficient one-class classification method for batch process monitoring, called support vector data description (SVDD), which has no Gaussian assumption of the process data, and is also effective for nonlinear process modeling.

120 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
25 Feb 1993
TL;DR: The authors introduce the concept of activity, which allows the process designer to create and hierarchically aggregate fragments of process specifications, and provide an execution model for activities and propose different alternatives for activity execution.
Abstract: The authors discuss some features provided by the SPADE environment to support the definition, analysis, and enactment of large and evolving software process models. In particular, they introduce the concept of activity, which allows the process designer to create and hierarchically aggregate fragments of process specifications. They then provide an execution model for activities and propose different alternatives for activity execution. They discuss the impact that the activity concept has on other important problems, such as incremental definition and evolution of large process models. >

120 citations

Book ChapterDOI
02 Sep 2008
TL;DR: This paper presents an approach where business users receive help in understanding the context and consequences of applying a pattern and describes an extension of a business process modeling tool with patterns to provide these capabilities.
Abstract: Although the business process community has put a major emphasis on patterns, notably the famous workflow patterns, only limited support for using patterns in today's business process modeling tools can be found. While the basic workflow patterns for control flow are available in almost every business process modeling tool, there is no support for the user in correctly applying these simple patterns leading to many incorrectly modeled business processes. Only limited support for pattern compounds can be found in some tools, there is no active support for selecting patterns that are applicable in some user-determined context, tools do not give feedback to the user if applying a pattern can lead to a modeling error, nor do they trace the sequence of applied patterns during the editing process. In this paper, we describe an extension of a business process modeling tool with patterns to provide these capabilities. We distinguish three scenarios of pattern application and discuss a set of pattern compounds that are based on the basic workflow patterns for control flow. We present an approach where business users receive help in understanding the context and consequences of applying a pattern.

120 citations

Book ChapterDOI
23 Jun 2008
TL;DR: The establishment of the verification will be surely helpful toward solving the problems on business process reengineering, business process management, service-oriented architecture, and so on.
Abstract: Information systems have to respond well to the changing business environment. Thus, they must have architecture which withstands the change. To design such systems, business process modeling is effective, however, the models include often abstractness and arbitrariness. Therefore, there have been efforts that validate rigorousness of the models. They have defined semantics of the models and applied various logics and formal methods to verification of the rigorousness. This paper focuses on formal verification of the models and surveys the efforts. We also discuss the prospect of the solutions. The establishment of the verification will be surely helpful toward solving the problems on business process reengineering, business process management, service-oriented architecture, and so on.

119 citations

Book ChapterDOI
25 Nov 2007
TL;DR: This paper discusses the theoretical connection between errors and metrics, and provides a comprehensive validation based on an extensive sample of EPC process models from practice, and investigates the capability of the metrics to predict errors in a second independent sample of models.
Abstract: Business process models play an important role for the management, design, and improvement of process organizations and process-aware information systems. Despite the extensive application of process modeling in practice, there are hardly empirical results available on quality aspects of process models. This paper aims to advance the understanding of this matter by analyzing the connection between formal errors (such as deadlocks) and a set of metrics that capture various structural and behavioral aspects of a process model. In particular, we discuss the theoretical connection between errors and metrics, and provide a comprehensive validation based on an extensive sample of EPC process models from practice. Furthermore, we investigate the capability of the metrics to predict errors in a second independent sample of models. The high explanatory power of the metrics has considerable consequences for the design of future modeling guidelines and modeling tools.

119 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Software development
73.8K papers, 1.4M citations
83% related
Web service
57.6K papers, 989K citations
82% related
Supply chain
84.1K papers, 1.7M citations
79% related
Information system
107.5K papers, 1.8M citations
78% related
Software
130.5K papers, 2M citations
78% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202359
2022184
2021254
2020327
2019368
2018395