Qualitative research

About: Qualitative research is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 39957 publications have been published within this topic receiving 2390470 citations. The topic is also known as: Qualitative method.

Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research

Abstract: This is the first in a series of three articles In the past decade, qualitative methods have become more commonplace in areas such as health services research and health technology assessment, and there has been a corresponding rise in the reporting of qualitative research studies in medical and related journals.1 Interest in these methods and their wider exposure in health research has led to necessary scrutiny of qualitative research. Researchers from other traditions are increasingly concerned to understand qualitative methods and, most importantly, to examine the claims researchers make about the findings obtained from these methods. The status of all forms of research depends on the quality of the methods used. In qualitative research, concern about assessing quality has manifested itself recently in the proliferation of guidelines for doing and judging qualitative work.2–5 Users and funders of research have had an important role in developing these guidelines as they become increasingly familiar with qualitative methods, but require some means of assessing their quality and of distinguishing “good” and “poor” quality research. However, the issue of “quality” in qualitative research is part of a much larger and contested debate about the nature of the knowledge produced by qualitative research, whether its quality can legitimately be judged, and, if so, how. This paper cannot do full justice to this wider epistemological debate. Rather it outlines two views of how qualitative methods might be judged and argues that qualitative research can be assessed according to two broad criteria: validity and relevance. #### Summary points Qualitative methods are now widely used and increasingly accepted in health research, but quality in qualitative research is a mystery to many health services researchers There is considerable debate over the nature of the knowledge produced by such methods and how such research should be judged Antirealists argue …

Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists

Abstract: From the Publisher: Qualitative Data Analysis shows that learning how to analyse qualitative data by computer can be fun. Written in a stimulating style, with examples drawn mainly from every day life and contemporary humour, it should appeal to a wide audience.

Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology

Abstract: About the authors Acknowledgements Part 1: Conceptual Preparation From recipes to adventures Epistemological bases for qualitative research Qualitative research design and data collection The role of interpretation Putting together a research proposal Part 2: Doing Research Thematic analysis Grounded theory methodology Phenomenological methods Case studies Discursive psychology Foucauldian discourse analysis Narrative psychology Visual methods Part 3: Reflections and Conclusions Quality in qualitative research Review and conclusion: Where next for qualitative psychology? Appendix 1: What influences a person's decision to want to stop using drugs? A grounded theory study exploring the experiences of heroin users Appendix 2: The experience of body dysmorphic disorder: An interpretative phenomenological analysis and photo elicitation study Appendix 3: Constructing self-harm at the turn of the 21st century: A Foucauldian discourse analysis References

The problem of rigor in qualitative research.

Abstract: There are few explicit discussions in nursing literature of how qualitative research can be made as rigorous as it is relevant to the perspective and goals of nursing. Four factors complicate the debate about the scientific merits of qualitative research: the varieties of qualitative methods, the la

Rigour and qualitative research.

Abstract: Various strategies are available within qualitative research to protect against bias and enhance the reliability of findings This paper gives examples of the principal approaches and summarises them into a methodological checklist to help readers of reports of qualitative projects to assess the quality of the research In the health field--with its strong tradition of biomedical research using conventional, quantitative, and often experimental methods--qualitative research is often criticised for lacking scientific rigour To label an approach “unscientific” is peculiarly damning in an era when scientific knowledge is generally regarded as the highest form of knowing The most commonly heard criticisms are, firstly, that qualitative research is merely an assembly of anecdote and personal impressions, strongly subject to researcher bias; secondly, it is argued that qualiative research lacks reproducibility--the research is so personal to the researcher that there is no guarantee that a different researcher would not come to radically different conclusions; and, finally, qualitative research is criticised for lacking generalisability It is said that qualitative methods tend to generate large amounts of detailed information about a small number of settings The pervasive assumption underlying all these criticisms is that quantitative and qualitative approaches are fundamentally different in their ability to ensure the validity and reliability of their findings This distinction, however, is more one of degree than of type The problem of the relation of a piece of research to some presumed underlying “truth” applies to the conduct of any form of social research “One of the greatest methodological fallacies of the last half century in social research is the belief that science is a particular set of techniques; it is, rather, a state of mind, or attitude, and the organisational conditions which allow that attitude to be expressed”1 In quantitative data analysis it is possible to generate statistical …