Rail freight transport

About: Rail freight transport is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 871 publications have been published within this topic receiving 6091 citations. The topic is also known as: freight train & goods train.

Automatic train control system and method

Abstract: A system and method for controlling the movement of plural freight trains (Figure 2) through a multiple route railway system with improved efficiency and safety. Freight train movements are precisely monitored and orchestrated (Figure 3) in accordance with a dynamic schedule that is determined through an evaluation of delivery requirements, coordination among all trains, speed restrictions and the effects of the track topography and train consist on train response to brake and power application.

Comparison of external costs of rail and truck freight transportation

Abstract: In this article we estimate external costs for four representative types of freight trains. For each type of freight train, we estimate three general types of external costs and compare them with the private costs experienced by railroad companies. The general types of external costs include: accidents (fatalities, injuries, and property damage); emissions (air pollution and greenhouse gases); and noise. Resulting private and external costs are compared with those of freight trucking, estimated in an earlier article. Rail external costs are 0.24 cent to 0.25 cent (US) per ton-mile, well less than the 1.11 cent for freight trucking, but external costs for rail generally constitute a larger amount relative to private costs, 9.3-22.6%, than is the case for trucking, 13.2%.

Scheduling extra freight trains on railway networks

Abstract: We study the problem of freight transportation in railway networks, where both passenger and freight trains are run. While the passenger trains have a prescribed timetable that cannot be changed, freight train operators send the infrastructure manager requests to insert new freight trains. For each freight train, the associated train operator specifies a preferred ideal timetable , which can be modified by the infrastructure manager in order to respect safeness operational constraints. In particular, this modification may correspond to routing the train along a path which is different with respect to the one in the ideal timetable. Roughly speaking, the objective is to introduce as many new freight trains as possible by assigning them timetables that are as close as possible to the ideal ones. For this timetabling problem on a generic railway network, we present an integer linear programming formulation, that generalizes some formulations already presented for the case of a single railway line, and a Lagrangian heuristic based on this formulation. Computational results on real-world instances are reported.

An assessment of the performance of the European long intermodal freight trains (LIFTS)

Abstract: Intermodal rail/road freight transport has always been considered as a competitive alternative to its road freight counterpart in the European medium- to long-distance corridors (markets). Such consideration has been based on the increasing competitiveness of some innovative rail services and the existing and prospective performance of both modes in terms of the full social – internal or operational and external – costs. The most recent innovation of rail technologies and related services launched by some European railway companies, still at the conceptual level, is the Long Intermodal Freight Train (LIFT). This is supposed to be a block train operating in long-distance corridors (markets) with a substantial and regular freight demand. This paper develops analytical models for assessing the performance of the LIFTs, the already-operating Conventional Intermodal Freight Trains (CIFTs), and their road counterpart as well. The performance consists of the full – internal (private) and external – costs of the door-to-door delivery of loading units – containers, swap-bodies, and semi-trailers. The internal costs embrace the operational costs of the transport (rail and road) and intermodal terminal operators. The external costs include the costs of the impacts of door-to-door delivery of loading units on society and the environment. These negative externalities include noise, air pollution, traffic accidents, and congestion. The models are applied to a simplified version of intermodal and road transport system using inputs from the European freight transport sector. The aims are to compare the full costs of particular modalities in order to investigate the potential of the LIFTs as compared with the CIFTs in improving the internal efficiency of the rail freight sector and its competitiveness with respect to its road counterpart. In addition, the paper attempts to assess some effects on the potential modal shift of EU (European Union) transport policies on internalizing transport externalities.

Railroad Accident Rates for Use in Transportation Risk Analysis

Abstract: Annual safety statistics published by FRA provide train accident counts for various groupings, such as railroad, accident type, cause, track type and class, train length, and speed. However, hazardous materials transportation risk analysis often requires more detailed accident rate statistics for specific combinations of these groupings. The statistics that are presented enable more precise determination of the probability that Class I and non-Class I railroad freight trains will be involved in an accident on various classes of main-line track. An increase in the overall accident rate from 1997 to 2001 can be largely attributed to the increase in yard accidents. During that time, the main-line derailment rate for Class I freight trains remained nearly constant. Track class-specific derailment rates for Class I main-line freight trains show two orders of magnitude difference between the lowest and highest FRA track classes. Depending on the risk analysis question, accounting for these differences in rates will often be important in developing an accurate estimate of risk over the length of a route or at particular locations along a route. A sensitivity analysis suggests that the distribution of freight train miles by FRA track class may have changed since a study conducted by the Association of American Railroads in the early 1990s. More up-to-date estimates of track class-specific accident rates would require new data on this distribution.