Random effects model

About: Random effects model is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 8388 publications have been published within this topic receiving 438823 citations. The topic is also known as: random effects & random effect.

A Monte Carlo method for Bayesian inference in frailty models.

Abstract: Many analyses in epidemiological and prognostic studies and in studies of event history data require methods that allow for unobserved covariates or "frailties." Clayton and Cuzick (1985, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 148, 82-117) proposed a generalization of the proportional hazards model that implemented such random effects, but the proof of the asymptotic properties of the method remains elusive, and practical experience suggests that the likelihoods may be markedly nonquadratic. This paper sets out a Bayesian representation of the model in the spirit of Kalbfleisch (1978, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 40, 214-221) and discusses inference using Monte Carlo methods.

Semiparametric Stochastic Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data

Abstract: We consider inference for a semiparametric stochastic mixed model for longitudinal data. This model uses parametric fixed effects to represent the covariate effects and an arbitrary smooth function to model the time effect and accounts for the within-subject correlation using random effects and a stationary or nonstationary stochastic process. We derive maximum penalized likelihood estimators of the regression coefficients and the nonparametric function. The resulting estimator of the nonparametric function is a smoothing spline. We propose and compare frequentist inference and Bayesian inference on these model components. We use restricted maximum likelihood to estimate the smoothing parameter and the variance components simultaneously. We show that estimation of all model components of interest can proceed by fitting a modified linear mixed model. We illustrate the proposed method by analyzing a hormone dataset and evaluate its performance through simulations.

Modeling publication selection effects in meta-analysis

Abstract: Publication selection effects arise in meta-analysis when the effect magnitude estimates are observed in (available from) only a subset of the studies that were actually conducted and the probability that an estimate is observed is related to the size of that estimate. Such selection effects can lead to substantial bias in estimates of effect magnitude. Research on the selection process suggests that much of the selection occurs because researchers, reviewers and editors view the results of studies as more conclusive when they are more highly statistically significant. This suggests a model of the selection process that depends on effect magnitude via the p-value or significance level. A model of the selection process involving a step function relating the p-value to the probability of selection is introduced in the context of a random effects model for meta-analysis. The model permits estimation of a weight function representing selection along the mean and variance of effects. Some ideas for graphical procedures and a test for publication selection are also introduced. The method is then applied to a meta-analysis of test validity studies.

An approximate generalized linear model with random effects for informative missing data.

Abstract: This paper develops a class of models to deal with missing data from longitudinal studies. We assume that separate models for the primary response and missingness (e.g., number of missed visits) are linked by a common random parameter. Such models have been developed in the econometrics (Heckman, 1979, Econometrica 47, 153-161) and biostatistics (Wu and Carroll, 1988, Biometrics 44, 175-188) literature for a Gaussian primary response. We allow the primary response, conditional on the random parameter, to follow a generalized linear model and approximate the generalized linear model by conditioning on the data that describes missingness. The resultant approximation is a mixed generalized linear model with possibly heterogeneous random effects. An example is given to illustrate the approximate approach, and simulations are performed to critique the adequacy of the approximation for repeated binary data.

Assessment of Actual Significance Levels for Covariate Effects in NONMEM

Abstract: The objectives of this study were to assess the difference between actual and nominal significance levels, as judged by the likelihood ratio test, for hypothesis tests regarding covariate effects using NONMEM, and to study what factors influence these levels. Also, a strategy for obtaining closer agreement between nominal and actual significance levels was investigated. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data without covariate relationships were simulated from a one compartment iv bolus model for 50 individuals. Models with and without covariate relationships were then fitted to the data, and differences in the objective function values were calculated. Alterations were made to the simulation settings; the structural and error models, the number of individuals, the number of samples per individual and the covariate distribution. Different estimation methods in NONMEM were also tried. In addition, a strategy for estimating the actual significance levels for a specific data set, model and parameter was investigated using covariate randomization and a real data set. Under most conditions when the first-order (FO) method was used, the actual significance level for including a covariate relationship in a model was higher than the nominal significance level. Among factors with high impact were frequency of sampling and residual error magnitude. The use of the first-order conditional estimation method with interaction (FOCE-INTER) resulted in close agreement between actual and nominal significance levels. The results from the covariate randomization procedure of the real data set were in agreement with the results from the simulation study. With the FO method the actual significance levels were higher than the nominal, independent of the covariate type, but depending on the parameter influenced. When using FOCE-INTER the actual and nominal levels were similar. The most important factors influencing the actual significance levels for the FO method are the approximation of the influence of the random effects in a nonlinear model, a heteroscedastic error structure in which an existing interaction between interindividual and residual variability is not accounted for in the model, and a lognormal distribution of the residual error which is approximated by a symmetric distribution. Estimation with FOCE–INTER and the covariate randomization procedure provide means to achieve agreement between nominal and actual significance levels.