Randomized controlled trial

About: Randomized controlled trial is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 119828 publications have been published within this topic receiving 4861808 citations. The topic is also known as: RCT & randomized control trial.

Comprehensive warm-up programme to prevent injuries in young female footballers: cluster randomised controlled trial

Abstract: ObjectiveToexaminetheeffectofacomprehensivewarm- up programme designed to reduce the risk of injuries in female youth football. Design Cluster randomised controlled trial with clubs as the unit of randomisation. Setting 125 football clubs from the south, east, and middle of Norway (65 clusters in the intervention group; 60 in the control group) followed for one league season (eight months). Participants 1892 female players aged 13-17 (1055 players in the intervention group; 837 players in the control group). Intervention A comprehensive warm-up programme to improve strength, awareness, and neuromuscular control during static and dynamic movements. Main outcome measure Injuries to the lower extremity (foot, ankle, lower leg, knee, thigh, groin, and hip). Results During one season, 264 players had relevant injuries: 121 players in the intervention group and 143 in thecontrolgroup(rateratio0.71,95%confidenceinterval 0.49 to 1.03). In the intervention group there was a significantly lower risk of injuries overall (0.68, 0.48 to 0.98), overuse injuries (0.47, 0.26 to 0.85), and severe injuries (0.55, 0.36 to 0.83). Conclusion Though the primary outcome of reduction in

A Case-Management System for Coronary Risk Factor Modification after Acute Myocardial Infarction

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a physician-directed, nurse-managed, home-based case-management system for coronary risk factor modification. Design: Randomized clinical trial in which patie...

Confirmatory interleukin-1 receptor antagonist trial in severe sepsis: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. The Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist Sepsis Investigator Group

Abstract: Objective: To determine the therapeutic efficacy and safety of recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (rhlL-1ra) in the treatment of patients with severe sepsis. Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial with a planned, midstudy, interim analysis. Setting: Ninety-one academic medical center intensive care units in North America and Europe. Patients: Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock (n = 696) received standard supportive care and antimicrobial therapy for sepsis, in addition to rhIL-1ra or placebo. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either rhlL-1ra (100 mg) or placebo (vehicle) by intravenous bolus, followed by a 72-hr continuous intravenous infusion of either rhIL-1ra (2.0 mg/ kg/hr) or placebo. Measurements and Main Results: The study was terminated after an interim analysis found that it was unlikely that the primary efficacy end points would be met. The 28-day, all-cause mortality rate was 33.1% (116/350) in the rhlL-1ra treatment group, while the mortality rate in the placebo group was 36.4% (126/346), yielding a 9% reduction in mortality rate (p = .36). The patients were well matched at the time of study entry; 52.9% of placebo-treated patients were in shock while 50.9% of rhIL-1ra-treated patients were in shock at the time of study entry (p = .30). The mortality rate did not significantly differ between treatment groups when analyzed on the basis of site of infection, infecting microorganism, presence of bacteremia, shock, organ dysfunction, or predicted risk of mortality at the time of study entry. No excess number of adverse reactions or microbial superinfections were attributable to rhlL-1ra treatment in this study. Conclusions: A 72-hr, continuous intravenous infusion of rhlL-1ra failed to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in mortality when compared with standard therapy in this multicenter clinical trial. If rhlL-1ra treatment has any therapeutic activity in severe sepsis, the incremental benefits are small and will be difficult to demonstrate in a patient population as defined by this clinical trial.

Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association

Abstract: Since the 1950s carotid endarterectomy has been performed in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, based on suggestive but inconclusive evidence for its effectiveness. Only during the last 5 years have randomized studies clarified the indications for surgery. In preparing this report, panel members used the same rules of evidence used in the previous report1 2 (Table⇓). View this table: Table 1. Levels of Evidence and Grading of Recommendations Few studies have analyzed control of risk factors in a randomized, prospective manner following carotid endarterectomy. However, a wealth of data are available regarding the general relationship between risk factor control and stroke risk. These data provide some guidance for the care of endarterectomy patients. ### Hypertension Hypertension is the most powerful, prevalent, and treatable risk factor for stroke.3 Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure are independently related to stroke incidence. Isolated systolic hypertension, which is common in the elderly, also considerably increases risk of stroke. Reduction of elevated blood pressure significantly lowers risk of stroke. Meta-analyses of randomized trials found that an average reduction in diastolic blood pressure of 6 mm Hg produces a 42% reduction in stroke incidence.3 4 Treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in people older than 60 years also reduces stroke incidence by 36% without an excessive number of side effects such as depression or dementia.5 Long-term care of patients after endarterectomy should include careful control of hypertension (Grade A recommendation for treatment of hypertension in general; Grade C recommendation for postendarterectomy care). Perioperative treatment of hypertension after carotid endarterectomy represents a special situation. Poor control of blood pressure after endarterectomy increases risk of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome.6 7 8 9 This complication is characterized by unilateral headache, seizures, and occasionally altered mental status or focal neurological signs. Neuroimaging may show intracerebral hemorrhages10 11 12 or white …

A video game improves behavioral outcomes in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a randomized trial.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE.Suboptimal adherence to self-administered medications is a common problem. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a video-game intervention for improving adherence and other behavioral outcomes for adolescents and young adults with malignancies including acute leukemia, lymphoma, and soft-tissue sarcoma. METHODS.A randomized trial with baseline and 1- and 3-month assessments was conducted from 2004 to 2005 at 34 medical centers in the United States, Canada, and Australia. A total of 375 male and female patients who were 13 to 29 years old, had an initial or relapse diagnosis of a malignancy, and currently undergoing treatment and expected to continue treatment for at least 4 months from baseline assessment were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. The intervention was a video game that addressed issues of cancer treatment and care for teenagers and young adults. Outcome measures included adherence, self-efficacy, knowledge, control, stress, and quality of life. For patients who were prescribed prophylactic antibiotics, adherence to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was tracked by electronic pill-monitoring devices (n 200). Adherence to 6-mercaptopurine was assessed through serum metabolite assays (n 54). RESULTS.Adherence to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and 6-mercaptopurine was greater in the intervention group. Self-efficacy and knowledge also increased in the intervention group compared with the control group. The intervention did not affect self-report measures of adherence, stress, control, or quality of life. CONCLUSIONS.The video-game intervention significantly improved treatment adherence and indicators of cancer-related self-efficacy and knowledge in adolescents and young adults who were undergoing cancer therapy. The findings support current efforts to develop effective video-game interventions for education and training in health care. Pediatrics 2008;122:e305‐e317