scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Ranking (information retrieval)

About: Ranking (information retrieval) is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 21109 publications have been published within this topic receiving 435130 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Criteria are given for the functions used to evaluate the relevance of the records to a specific query, including self-consistency, as a generalization of a Boolean retrieval system.
Abstract: The use of weights to denote a query representation and/or the indexing of a document is analysed as a generalization of a Boolean retrieval system. Criteria are given for the functions used to evaluate the relevance of the records to a specific query, including self-consistency. Various mechanisms suggested in the literature for evaluating the relevance of records with regard to a given query are tested and found to be less than satisfactory. A new approach is suggested to avoid some of the perils of a weighted Boolean retrieval system.

161 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
24 May 1994
TL;DR: This work presents a bottom-up algorithm that generates an efficient query evaluation plan based on cost estimates, and identifies a number of directions in which future research can be directed.
Abstract: Many applications require the ability to manipulate sequences of data. We motivate the importance of sequence query processing, and present a framework for the optimization of sequence queries based on several novel techniques. These include query transformations, optimizations that utilize meta-data, and caching of intermediate results. We present a bottom-up algorithm that generates an efficient query evaluation plan based on cost estimates. This work also identifies a number of directions in which future research can be directed.

161 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Zhang et al. as discussed by the authors proposed an end-to-end dual-path convolutional network to learn the image and text representations, which is based on an unsupervised assumption that each image/text group can be viewed as a class.
Abstract: Matching images and sentences demands a fine understanding of both modalities. In this article, we propose a new system to discriminatively embed the image and text to a shared visual-textual space. In this field, most existing works apply the ranking loss to pull the positive image/text pairs close and push the negative pairs apart from each other. However, directly deploying the ranking loss on heterogeneous features (i.e., text and image features) is less effective, because it is hard to find appropriate triplets at the beginning. So the naive way of using the ranking loss may compromise the network from learning inter-modal relationship. To address this problem, we propose the instance loss, which explicitly considers the intra-modal data distribution. It is based on an unsupervised assumption that each image/text group can be viewed as a class. So the network can learn the fine granularity from every image/text group. The experiment shows that the instance loss offers better weight initialization for the ranking loss, so that more discriminative embeddings can be learned. Besides, existing works usually apply the off-the-shelf features, i.e., word2vec and fixed visual feature. So in a minor contribution, this article constructs an end-to-end dual-path convolutional network to learn the image and text representations. End-to-end learning allows the system to directly learn from the data and fully utilize the supervision. On two generic retrieval datasets (Flickr30k and MSCOCO), experiments demonstrate that our method yields competitive accuracy compared to state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, in language-based person retrieval, we improve the state of the art by a large margin. The code has been made publicly available.

161 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A new type of passage is introduced, overlapping fragments of either fixed or variable length, and it is shown that ranking with these arbitrary passages gives substantial improvements in retrieval effectiveness over traditional document ranking schemes, particularly for queries on collections of long documents.
Abstract: Text retrieval systems store a great variety of documents, from abstracts, newspaper articles, and Web pages to journal articles, books, court transcripts, and legislation. Collections of diverse types of documents expose shortcomings in current approaches to ranking. Use of short fragments of documents, called passages, instead of whole documents can overcome these shortcomings: passage ranking provides convenient units of text to return to the user, can avoid the difficulties of comparing documents of different length, and enables identification of short blocks of relevant material among otherwise irrelevant text. In this article, we compare several kinds of passage in an extensive series of experiments. We introduce a new type of passage, overlapping fragments of either fixed or variable length. We show that ranking with these arbitrary passages gives substantial improvements in retrieval effectiveness over traditional document ranking schemes, particularly for queries on collections of long documents. Ranking with arbitrary passages shows consistent improvements compared to ranking with whole documents, and to ranking with previous passage types that depend on document structure or topic shifts in documents.

161 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Machine learning methods are shown to be possible to automatically build models for retrieving high-quality, content-specific articles using inclusion or citation by the ACP Journal Club as a gold standard in a given time period in internal medicine that perform better than the 1994 PubMed clinical query filters.

160 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Web page
50.3K papers, 975.1K citations
83% related
Ontology (information science)
57K papers, 869.1K citations
82% related
Graph (abstract data type)
69.9K papers, 1.2M citations
82% related
Feature learning
15.5K papers, 684.7K citations
81% related
Supervised learning
20.8K papers, 710.5K citations
81% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20241
20233,112
20226,541
20211,105
20201,082
20191,168