scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Rationality

About: Rationality is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 20459 publications have been published within this topic receiving 617787 citations.


Papers
More filters
Book
01 May 1992
TL;DR: In this paper, a discussion introductory comment colloquium with H.A. Simon and Robin Marris on bounded rationality was held. But the discussion was limited to the following topics: subejective rationality and the explanation of social behaviour, Raymond Boudon organizational learning, problem solving and the division of labour.
Abstract: Part 1 Bounded rationality: discussion introductory comment colloquium with H.A. Simon. Part 2 Herbert Simon reprints: rational choice and the structure of the environment (1956) thinking by comuters (1966) information processing in computers and man (1964) scientific discovery as problem solving (1988). Part 3 New papers: subejective rationality and the explanation of social behaviour, Raymond Boudon organizational learning, problem solving and the division of labour, Massimo Egidi cognitive constraints of economic rationality, Ricardo Viale implications for economics, Robin Marris.

324 citations

Book
01 Jan 1984
TL;DR: The Specific and Peculiar Rationalism of Modern Western Civilization as mentioned in this paper The Nature and Limits of Rational Action 3. The Ethical Irrationality of the World 4. Weber's moral vision
Abstract: Introduction 1. The Specific and Peculiar Rationalism of Modern Western Civilization 2. The Nature and Limits of Rational Action 3. The Ethical Irrationality of the World 4. Weber's moral Vision

324 citations

Book
01 Jan 2002
TL;DR: The authors argue that the conventional opposition between emotion and rationality in western culture is a myth and that the effect of this myth has been to support a market economy which systematically destroys nature, and to exclude from public decision making the kinds of emotional attachments that support more environmentally sensitive ways of living.
Abstract: As the full effects of human activity on Earth's life-support systems are revealed by science, the question of whether we can change, fundamentally, our relationship with nature becomes increasingly urgent. Just as important as an understanding of our environment, is an understanding of ourselves, of the kinds of beings we are and why we act as we do. In Loving Nature Kay Milton considers why some people in Western societies grow up to be nature lovers, actively concerned about the welfare and future of plants, animals, ecosystems and nature in general, while others seem indifferent or intent on destroying these things. Drawing on findings and ideas from anthropology, psychology, cognitive science and philosophy, the author discusses how we come to understand nature as we do, and above all, how we develop emotional commitments to it. Anthropologists, in recent years, have tended to suggest that our understanding of the world is shaped solely by the culture in which we live. Controversially Kay Milton argues that it is shaped by direct experience in which emotion plays an essential role. The author argues that the conventional opposition between emotion and rationality in western culture is a myth. The effect of this myth has been to support a market economy which systematically destroys nature, and to exclude from public decision making the kinds of emotional attachments that support more environmentally sensitive ways of living. A better understanding of ourselves, as fundamentally emotional beings, could give such ways of living the respect they need.

320 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that resource-rational models can reconcile the mind's most impressive cognitive skills with people's ostensive irrationality, and provides a new way to connect psychological theory more deeply with artificial intelligence, economics, neuroscience, and linguistics.
Abstract: Modeling human cognition is challenging because there are infinitely many mechanisms that can generate any given observation. Some researchers address this by constraining the hypothesis space through assumptions about what the human mind can and cannot do, while others constrain it through principles of rationality and adaptation. Recent work in economics, psychology, neuroscience, and linguistics has begun to integrate both approaches by augmenting rational models with cognitive constraints, incorporating rational principles into cognitive architectures, and applying optimality principles to understanding neural representations. We identify the rational use of limited resources as a unifying principle underlying these diverse approaches, expressing it in a new cognitive modeling paradigm called resource-rational analysis. The integration of rational principles with realistic cognitive constraints makes resource-rational analysis a promising framework for reverse-engineering cognitive mechanisms and representations. It has already shed new light on the debate about human rationality and can be leveraged to revisit classic questions of cognitive psychology within a principled computational framework. We demonstrate that resource-rational models can reconcile the mind's most impressive cognitive skills with people's ostensive irrationality. Resource-rational analysis also provides a new way to connect psychological theory more deeply with artificial intelligence, economics, neuroscience, and linguistics.

320 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper found that belief in economic individualism leads people to accept personal responsibility for their economic conditions, which in turn eliminates any connection between personal well-being and political evaluation, and discussed the role of political culture and belief in the assessment of "self-interest" and "rationality" in political behavior.
Abstract: The nature of the relationship between personal economic well-being and political behavior has been an object of much theory and research in the social sciences. A growing number of studies of survey data have concluded, however, that there is little or no relationship in the U.S. between financial well-being and political attitudes and behavior. This paper offers an explanation for these findings based on the way people perceive the nature of their financial well-being. The analysis shows that belief in economic individualism leads people to accept personal responsibility for their economic conditions, which in turn eliminates any connection between personal well-being and political evaluation. I discuss the role of political culture and belief in the assessment of "self-interest" and "rationality" in political behavior in light of these findings.

318 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Ideology
54.2K papers, 1.1M citations
85% related
Empirical research
51.3K papers, 1.9M citations
81% related
Politics
263.7K papers, 5.3M citations
80% related
Incentive
41.5K papers, 1M citations
79% related
Democracy
108.6K papers, 2.3M citations
79% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023921
20221,963
2021645
2020689
2019682
2018753