scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers on "Receptive field published in 1967"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An examination of the physiological properties of cells in cat lumbar dorsal horn shows that there are three horizontal laminae which correspond approximately to Rexed (1952) laminaes 4, 5, and 6.
Abstract: 1. An examination of the physiological properties of cells in cat lumbar dorsal horn shows that there are three horizontal laminae which correspond approximately to Rexed (1952) laminae 4, 5, and 6.2. A summary diagram (Fig. 9) suggests the relation of the laminae to each other and to afferent and descending fibres. All three laminae respond to cutaneous stimulation but only lamina 6 responds to movement. By comparing responses of cells in decerebrate and spinal preparations, it is shown that the brain stem inhibits cutaneous responses and enhances movement responses. Pyramidal tract stimulation affects cells in laminae 4, 5, and 6.3. Cells in lamina 4 have small cutaneous receptive fields and respond as though many different types of specific cutaneous afferents converge on them. Cells in lamina 5 respond as though many cells of lamina 4 converge on them. In the decerebrate animal the responses of lamina 5 cells habituate to repeated light pressure stimuli but the cells remain responsive to new stimuli in other parts of their receptive field. Impulses descending from the brain stem can switch the modality of lamina 6 cells from cutaneous to proprioceptive.

571 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A survey of the properties of retinal ganglion cells in the central part of the rabbit retina has been carried out and it is found that the cells are more active in the posterior half of the retina than in the anterior half.
Abstract: 1. A survey of the properties of retinal ganglion cells in the central part of the rabbit retina has been carried out. 2. The five types of unit previously encountered in the peripheral retina were also found in the central region. Their receptive fields were smaller, and tended to be oval-shaped with the long axis horizontal. 3. In addition, three new types were discovered: orientation-selective cells, local-edge-detectors, uniformity-detectors. 4. Orientation-selective cells were sensitive to either vertically or horizontally extended targets. Analysis suggested they were modified concentric units with an incomplete antagonistic surround. 5. Local-edge-detectors responded to the appearance or movement of a contrasting border within the receptive field. They were inhibited by similar stimulation of the region surrounding the receptive field. Detailed attention was given to the demonstration of edge-detection. 6. Uniformity detectors had a relatively high level of ongoing activity in the absence of stimulation. All forms of stimulation (lights flashed on or off, movement of darker or lighter targets) produced a diminution or cessation of ongoing activity. 7. The results are compared with behaviour described in other species.

376 citations




Journal ArticleDOI
17 Nov 1967-Science
TL;DR: The majority of ganglion cells in the retina of goldfish have receptive fields organized so that the cells respond particularly to simultaneous contrasts of color.
Abstract: The majority of ganglion cells in the retina of goldfish have receptive fields organized so that the cells respond particularly to simultaneous contrasts of color. The receptive fields are concentrically arranged. If the cell is excited by red light in the center, then it will also be excited by green light in the periphery, and inhibited by green light in the center or red light in the periphery. The occurrence of this arrangement and the reverse is about equal. The receptive field is much larger than had previously been thought.

113 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Observations of the effect of such stimulations on unit activity in the lateral geniculate nucleus suggest that inferotemporal cortex excitation alters the configuration of the receptive field while frontal cortex stimulation influences the background activity of the unit.

100 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Receptive fields of perifoveal ganglion cells have been measured by determining threshold for eliciting a just detectable response using either concentric spot stimuli centred on the receptive field or small spot stimuli in different parts of the receptiveField at various states of retinal adaptation.
Abstract: 1. Receptive fields of perifoveal ganglion cells have been measured by determining threshold for eliciting a just detectable response using either concentric spot stimuli centred on the receptive field or small spot stimuli in different parts of the receptive field at various states of retinal adaptation and with stimuli selected to separate rod from cone function. 2. Light-adaptation decreases the sensitivity, latency and duration of threshold responses throughout the receptive field of a ganglion cell. 3. With all patterns of retinal stimulation and states of adaptation, threshold signals of the rods reach a ganglion cell later and those of the cones earlier than approximately 50 msec after a light stimulus. 4. In the more dark-adapted retina threshold rod and cone signals can be transmitted to the brain by the same or by neighbouring ganglion cells but not simultaneously; in the light-adapted state only the cone signal is transmitted.

92 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
07 Jul 1967-Science
TL;DR: A new type of receptive field of cat retinal ganglion cells is described and termed the "suppressed-by-contrast" type, which is suppressed by a variety of visual stimuli and cannot be found to increase the firing rate above the maintained level.
Abstract: A new type of receptive field of cat retinal ganglion cells is described and termed the "suppressed-by-contrast" type. The firing rate of these cells is suppressed by a variety of visual stimuli. However, it has not been possible to find a stimulus that increases the firing rate above the maintained level.

86 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It was concluded that the accessory optic system is specialized for detecting movement in the vertical plane, and over half of the neurons in the nucleus of the transpeduncular tract were directionally selective in their response to vertically moving stimuli.

64 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: These findings, combined with previous findings of units sensitive to direction of movement and light flux in the cat's retina, indicate that considerably more processing of the visual image is performed at the retinal level than hitherto suspected.

46 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It was found that the following stimulus parameters determine the response of these class-2 and class-3 neurons: angular velocity, stimulus size, contrast of stimulus against a white or a black background, position of the path of traverse in the receptive field, and the time between the movement of identical stimuli along the same path through the receptive fields.
Abstract: In the frog's retina (Rana esculenta, Rana pipiens) two classes of neurons which are especially sensitive to stimuli moved through the receptive fields were investigated. It was found that the following stimulus parameters determine the response of these class-2 and class-3 neurons: angular velocity (v), stimulus size (A), contrast of stimulus against a white or a black background (c), position of the path of traverse in the receptive field (P), and the time (t) between the movement of identical stimuli along the same path through the receptive field. These parameters were changed within a considerable range; the relation between the parameter change and the neuronal response is given in different equations. A final formula, which allows one to calculate the average response of a class-2 or a class-3 neurons to a stimulus moved through the excitatory receptive field is given in equations 6a and 6b.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The response characteristics of single cells in the main sensory trigeminal nucleus were studied in cats anesthetized with chloralose or Nembutal and indicate that considerable modification of somatosensory input occurs at this first central relay nucleus in the trigeminals system.

Journal ArticleDOI
29 Jul 1967-Nature
TL;DR: The ganglion cells of the frog retina can be sub-divided into different functional classes, and class I cells (sustained edge detectors) respond to sharp edges moving through their receptive field, giving a stronger response when the object causing the edge is small than when it is large.
Abstract: THE ganglion cells of the frog retina can be sub-divided into different functional classes1. When investigated under light adapted conditions, class I cells (sustained edge detectors) respond to sharp edges moving through their receptive field, giving a stronger response when the object causing the edge is small than when it is large. A sustained response occurs when an edge is stopped within the field. In darkness, with a standing edge present in the receptive field, a response can be elicited by turning on the light or by a short flash of light.

Journal ArticleDOI
05 Aug 1967-Nature
TL;DR: It is shown that the nucleus contains mechanoceptive cells with excitatory or inhibitory thermoceptive influences on them, that the observation of surround inhibition in this nucleus depends in part on the type of anaesthesia used, and that some of the cells have directional sensitivity.
Abstract: This article describes some new receptive properties of cells in the nucleus ventralis posterolateralis It is shown that the nucleus contains mechanoceptive cells with excitatory or inhibitory thermoceptive influences on them, that the observation of surround inhibition in this nucleus depends in part on the type of anaesthesia used, and that some of the cells have directional sensitivity

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The findings suggest that the nucleus relays its spinal input to the neocerebellum and possible spinal afferents to the nucleus are not limited to the ventrospinocere Bellar tract.

Journal ArticleDOI
27 May 1967-Nature
TL;DR: It is shown that, in the rabbit, retinal ganglion cells1, geniculate cells2,3 and midbrain cells4 respond most readily to special aspects of light stimulation related to movement, while in the cat, these peripheral systems respond most effectively to an alteration of intensity of a stationary light spot.
Abstract: IT has been shown that, in the rabbit, retinal ganglion cells1, geniculate cells2,3 and midbrain cells4 respond most readily to special aspects of light stimulation related to movement. In the cat5–7, by contrast, these peripheral systems respond most effectively to an alteration of intensity of a stationary light spot, and have their receptive fields concentrically arranged with “on-centres and off-surrounds” (or vice versa). In the rabbit, on the other hand, the shape and organization of peripheral receptive fields are less stereotyped.