Topic
Receptive field
About: Receptive field is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 8537 publications have been published within this topic receiving 596428 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: This work considers how the responses of complex cells could be sparsely represented by a higher-order neural layer, which leads to contour coding and end-stopped receptive fields in the primary visual cortex.
170 citations
TL;DR: Patch-clamp recordings revealed that distal processes of starburst amacrine cells (SACs) received largely excitatory synaptic input from the receptive field center and nearly purely inhibitory inputs from the surround during both stationary and moving light stimulations.
170 citations
TL;DR: Anatomical and electrophysiological mapping techniques were used to determine topographic organization and arrangement of ocular dominance columns in the primary visual cortex of ferrets.
Abstract: Anatomical and electrophysiological mapping techniques were used to determine topographic organization and arrangement of ocular dominance columns in the primary visual cortex of ferrets. From its border with area 18 on the posterior lateral gyrus, area 17 extends around the caudal pole of the hemisphere and over the splenial gyrus to the caudal bank of the splenial sulcus. The visuotopic map is oriented with the isoazimuth lines approximately parallel to the long axis of the posterior lateral gyrus and the isoelevation lines approximately perpendicular to the isoazimuths. Central azimuths are represented on the posterior lateral gyrus and peripheral azimuths are represented on the splenial gyrus; the inferior visual field maps medially and the superior visual field maps laterally. As in other species, the representation of the central visual field is expanded. The ferret has a considerable degree of binocular vision. Receptive fields driven through the ipsilateral eye extended more than 20 degrees into the contralateral visual field. Within the region of area 17 corresponding to the binocular portion of the visual field, tritiated proline injected into one eye transneuronally labelled an ipsilateral projection as a series of patchy bands roughly complementary to gaps in the labelled contralateral projection. Physiological ocular dominance columns were evident as well in that neurons and groups of neurons recorded in this region showed clustered ocular dominance preferences. Most single neurons studied were binocularly driven.
169 citations
TL;DR: The receptive field and topographic organization of single orosensory neurons located throughout the rostral division of the nucleus of the solitary tract (rNST) was studied by determining their responsiveness to gustatory stimulation of the entire oral cavity and to Gustatory and mechanical stimulation of restricted oral regions.
Abstract: 1. The receptive field and topographic organization of single orosensory neurons located throughout the rostral division of the nucleus of the solitary tract (rNST) was studied by determining their responsiveness to gustatory stimulation of the entire oral cavity and to gustatory and mechanical stimulation of restricted oral regions. The rNST contained roughly equal numbers of two distinct populations of orosensory neurons, one responsive exclusively to oral mechanical stimulation (M neurons), the other to gustatory stimulation (G neurons). Some G neurons also responded to oral somatosensory stimuli, but usually less vigorously than to gustatory stimuli. The distribution of these two populations of rNST neurons was topographically organized: G neurons were centered anteriorly and medially to M neurons. 2. Eight of 44 G neurons responded only when the whole oral cavity was stimulated, but the remaining 36 cells responded to circumscribed stimulation of taste buds on the anterior tongue (AT), foliate papillae of the posterior tongue, nasoincisor ducts, retromolar mucosa (RM), or soft palate (SP). Overall, AT and SP stimulation were the most effective, and RM stimulation the least effective, for activating nucleus of the solitary tract (NST) G neurons. 3. Approximately half of the G neurons for which a receptive field could be defined (N = 36) responded to stimulation of a single taste receptor subpopulation, but the remaining neurons received convergent input from two or more taste bud groups. The receptive field configurations for convergent G neurons were orderly: convergence occurred preferentially between receptor subpopulations either within the anterior oral cavity (AO) or the posterior oral cavity (PO). An AO-PO distinction also was reflected in the topographic organization of gustatory responses. The mean location of neurons responding optimally to AO gustatory stimulation was more anterior in the NST, and also tended to be more lateral and ventral than the location of neurons that responded optimally to PO stimulation. 4. Forty-four rNST M neurons responded to innocuous mechanical stimulation of restricted areas of the tongue, palate, buccal mucosa, or periodontium. Stimulation of the hard palate and circumvallate papilla were most effective, whereas periodontal stimulation was least effective for activating these cells. 5. A majority (32 of 44) of rNST M neurons responded to stimulation of more than one of the oral sites tested.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
169 citations
TL;DR: These findings support the view that specific, learned auditory memory content is stored in the ACx, and further that this storage of information during learning and the instantiation of the memory code involves the engagement of the nucleus basalis and its release of acetylcholine into target structures, particularly the cerebral cortex.
169 citations