scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Referral

About: Referral is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 27614 publications have been published within this topic receiving 479918 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Estimating the feasibility of evaluating innovative models of working at the interface between primary care and secondary mental health services and comparing the different models of service delivery is examined is examined.
Abstract: BACKGROUND This paper examines the feasibility of evaluating innovative models of working at the interface between primary care and secondary mental health services. METHOD Methodological problems relevant to evaluation of innovative models of working at the interface are discussed. RESULTS Although there is some evidence that neurotic disorders can be more cost-effectively treated in primary care, many general practitioners (GPs), and possibly some patients, prefer referral to community mental health teams and community psychiatric nurses, which are provided by the secondary health care services. Since the latter are provided with the intention of improving serious mental illness their involvement in the care of neurotic illness can lead to tensions between GPs, local health authorities and service providers. There is little evidence to suggest that psychiatrists working in health centres using the 'shifted out-patient' model have eased this problem. By contrast the 'consultation-liaison' (C-L) model has a number of theoretical advantages; referrals to secondary care should be limited to those most in need of this level of expertise and GP management skills should improve, so leading to better quality of care for patients who are not referred. CONCLUSION Studies comparing the different models of service delivery are required to address the tensions that have arisen following changes in government policy. Further work is also needed to develop the necessary research tools.

182 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Delayed nephrology referral generated strikingly greater initial morbidity, but long-term outcome of hemodialysis patients was not modified by delayed nephrological care.

182 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Implementing a collaborative care intervention for behavior problems in community pediatric practices is feasible and broadly effective, supporting the utility of integrated behavioral health care services.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of collaborative care for behavior problems, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and anxiety in pediatric primary care (Doctor Office Collaborative Care; DOCC). METHODS: Children and their caregivers participated from 8 pediatric practices that were cluster randomized to DOCC (n = 160) or enhanced usual care (EUC; n = 161). In DOCC, a care manager delivered a personalized, evidence-based intervention. EUC patients received psychoeducation and a facilitated specialty care referral. Care processes measures were collected after the 6-month intervention period. Family outcome measures included the Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Parent Rating Scale, Parenting Stress Index-Short Form, Individualized Goal Attainment Ratings, and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale. Most measures were collected at baseline, and 6-, 12-, and 18-month assessments. Provider outcome measures examined perceived treatment change, efficacy, and obstacles, and practice climate. RESULTS: DOCC (versus EUC) was associated with higher rates of treatment initiation (99.4% vs 54.2%; P CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a collaborative care intervention for behavior problems in community pediatric practices is feasible and broadly effective, supporting the utility of integrated behavioral health care services.

182 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Physical therapists with an orthopedic specialization were almost twice as likely to make correct decisions for critical medical and musculoskeletal conditions.
Abstract: Background and Purpose. Opponents of direct access to physical therapy argue that physical therapists may overlook serious medical conditions. More information is needed to determine the ability of physical therapists to practice safely in direct-access environments. The purpose of this study was to describe the ability of physical therapists to make decisions about the management of patients in a direct-access environment. Subjects. Of a random sample of 1,000 members of the Private Practice Section of the American Physical Therapy Association, 394 participated. Methods. A survey included 12 hypothetical case scenarios. For each case, participants determined whether they would provide intervention without referral, provide intervention and refer, or refer before intervention. The percentage of correct decisions for each group of scenarios was calculated for each participant, and participants were classified as having made correct decisions for 100% of cases or less for each group. Three sets of logistic regressions were completed to determine the characteristics of the participants in relation to the decision category. Results. The average percentages of correct decisions were 87%, 88%, and 79% for musculoskeletal, noncritical medical, and critical medical conditions, respectively. Of all participants, approximately 50% made correct decisions for all cases within each group. The odds of making 100% correct decisions if a physical therapist had an orthopedic specialization were 2.23 (95% confidence interval=1.35–3.71) for musculoskeletal conditions and 1.89 (95% confidence interval=1.14–3.15) for critical medical conditions. Discussion and Conclusion. Physical therapists with an orthopedic specialization were almost twice as likely to make correct decisions for critical medical and musculoskeletal conditions.

182 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 2002
TL;DR: To understand better the barriers among orthopedic surgeons and primary care physicians in identifying and treating possible osteoporosis in patients hospitalized with a fragility fracture sustained spontaneously or from a fall no greater than standing height, a 1-page, 7-question survey was sent.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE To understand better the barriers among orthopedic surgeons and primary care physicians in identifying and treating possible osteoporosis in patients hospitalized with a fragility fracture sustained spontaneously or from a fall no greater than standing height. Methods A 1-page, 7-question survey was sent to 35 admitting orthopedic surgeons and 75 primary care physicians at a midwestern managed care organization in March 2001. Returned surveys were collected until 30 days had passed since the mailing. Primary care physicians were board-certified family practitioners and internal medicine physicians. All orthopedists were admitting surgeons in the hospital system. Responders were anonymous, and posted surveys were returned to the Orthopaedic Collaborative Practice office. The surveys were color-coded to separate responses from orthopedic surgeons and primary care physicians. Results Thirty-one surveys were returned: 23 (31%) from primary care physicians and 8 (23%) from orthopedic surgeons. Survey respondents agreed that the responsibility for postfracture attention to nutritional needs, including calcium and vitamin D, rested with the primary care provider. When asked about barriers to recommending bone mineral density testing with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, 9 primary care physicians (39%) thought this type of testing was unnecessary for treatment, and 4 primary care physicians (17%) thought a barrier was caused by patient frailty. Primary care physicians indicated that potential adverse effects of medication (n=14 [61%]) and cost of therapy (n=13 [57%]) were the main factors limiting treatment. When asked to identify the single most important barrier in treatment, 14 physicians (61%) indicated cost was the greatest deterrent. Twentyone primary care physicians (91%) reported they would be more likely to treat a patient with osteoporosis if a safe medication with proven fracture risk reduction were available. Primary care physicians indicated they were more likely to treat independently living adults (n=12 [52%]) and women compared with men (n=15 [65%]). All orthopedic surgeons (n=8) were willing for all patients to be evaluated in consultation with a nurse practitioner. Primary care respondents were less apt to agree with a nurse practitioner referral (n=5 [22%]). Both primary care physicians (n=16 [70%]) and orthopedic surgeons (n=4 [50%]) agreed that there is a need for increased primary care education about managing osteoporosis in patients hospitalized with low-impact fracture. Conclusions Orthopedic surgeons were consistent in their opinion that postfracture attention to osteoporosis should rest with the primary care physician. Primary care physicians agree but report that cost and possible adverse effects of medication are major barriers to this care. Despite therapies for high-risk postfracture patients showing relative safety and proven efficacy in reducing future fractures, deterrents to this care are focused on cost and potential adverse effects. Further education is needed to promote a standard of care for the postfracture patient that is directed toward the prevention of a subsequent fracture.

181 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Cohort study
58.9K papers, 2.8M citations
92% related
Randomized controlled trial
119.8K papers, 4.8M citations
92% related
Odds ratio
68.7K papers, 3M citations
91% related
Health care
342.1K papers, 7.2M citations
91% related
Public health
158.3K papers, 3.9M citations
90% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20251
20242
20233,272
20226,893
20211,905
20201,749