scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Regulation of gene expression

About: Regulation of gene expression is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 85456 publications have been published within this topic receiving 5832845 citations. The topic is also known as: GO:0010468 & gene expression regulation.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that microRNAs (miRNAs) are important components of the p53 transcriptional network and miR-34a-responsive genes are highly enriched for those that regulate cell-cycle progression, apoptosis, DNA repair, and angiogenesis.

2,008 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
21 Apr 2016-Cell
TL;DR: It is concluded that transcript levels by themselves are not sufficient to predict protein levels in many scenarios and to thus explain genotype-phenotype relationships and that high-quality data quantifying different levels of gene expression are indispensable for the complete understanding of biological processes.

1,996 citations

01 Jan 2001
TL;DR: The emerging view is that chromosomes are compartmentalized into discrete territories, and the location of a gene within a chromosome territory seems to influence its access to the machinery responsible for specific nuclear functions, such as transcription and splicing.
Abstract: tion of gene expression and other nuclear functions — namely the architecture of the nucleus as a whole. In particular, we describe evidence for a compartmentalized nuclear architecture in the mammalian cell nucleus based on chromosome territories (CTs) and an interchromatin compartment (IC) that contains macromolecular complexes that are required for replication, transcription, splicing and repair (summarized in FIG. 1). Other nuclear components, such as the nucleolus, nuclear lamina and pores, are not reviewed here (for reviews, see REFS 15,16), and although the focus of this review is the mammalian nucleus, the nuclear architecture of other organisms will be mentioned where appropriate. During the past two decades, various new methods have expanded the cell biologist’s ‘toolkit’ for the study of nuclear architecture and function (BOX 1). These methods have provided the basis for detailed studies of CTs, as well as for studies of the topology and dynamics of non-chromatin domains in the nucleus of fixed and, more recently, living cells. Computer simulations of CTs and nuclear architecture are also being used to make quantitative predictions that can be tested experimentally. On the basis of Despite all the celebrations associated with the sequencing of the human genome, and the genomes of other model organisms, our abilities to interpret genome sequences are quite limited. For example, we cannot understand the orchestrated activity — and the silencing — of many thousands of genes in any given cell just on the basis of DNA sequences, such as promoter and enhancer elements. How are the profound differences in gene activities established and maintained in a large number of cell types to ensure the development and functioning of a complex multicellular organism? To answer this question fully, we need to understand how genomes are organized in the nucleus, the basic principles of nuclear architecture and the changes in nuclear organization that occur during cellular differentiation. During recent years, EPIGENETIC mechanisms of gene regulation, such as DNA methylation and histone modification, have entered the centre stage of chromatin research. Modifications of DNA and nucleosomes, however, as well as boundaries and insulators, that affect gene regulation at the chromatin level are not the focus of this article. Instead, we review experimental data and models for a higher level of the regulaCHROMOSOME TERRITORIES, NUCLEAR ARCHITECTURE AND GENE REGULATION IN MAMMALIAN CELLS

1,984 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The efficacy of different antioxidants to favorably influence the molecular mechanisms implicated in human disease should be a critical determinant of its selection for clinical studies.
Abstract: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are implicated in the pathogenesis of a wide variety of human diseases. Recent evidence suggests that at moderately high concentrations, certain forms of ROS such as H202 may act as signal transduction messengers. To develop a better understanding of the exact mechanisms that underlie ROS-dependent disorders in biological systems, recent studies have investigated the regulation of gene expression by oxidants, antioxidants, and other determinants of the intracellular reduction-oxidation (redox) state. At least two well-defined transcription factors, nuclear factor (NF) kappa B and activator protein (AP) -1 have been identified to be regulated by the intracellular redox state. The regulation of gene expression by oxidants, antioxidants, and the redox state has emerged as a novel subdiscipline in molecular biology that has promising therapeutic implications. Binding sites of the redox-regulated transcription factors NF-kappa B and AP-1 are located in the promoter region of a large variety of genes that are directly involved in the pathogenesis of diseases, e.g., AIDS, cancer, atherosclerosis and diabetic complications. Biochemical and clinical studies have indicated that antioxidant therapy may be useful in the treatment of disease. Critical steps in the signal transduction cascade are sensitive to oxidants and antioxidants. Many basic events of cell regulation such as protein phosphorylation and binding of transcription factors to consensus sites on DNA are driven by physiological oxidant-antioxidant homeostasis, especially by the thiol-disulfide balance. Endogenous glutathione and thioredoxin systems, and the exogenous lipoate-dihydrolipoate couple may therefore be considered to be effective regulators of redox-sensitive gene expression. The efficacy of different antioxidants to favorably influence the molecular mechanisms implicated in human disease should be a critical determinant of its selection for clinical studies.

1,975 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is suggested that the IRE1/XBP-1 pathway is required for efficient protein folding, maturation, and degradation in the ER and imply the existence of subsets of UPR target genes as defined by their dependence on XBP- 1.
Abstract: The mammalian unfolded protein response (UPR) protects the cell against the stress of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). We have investigated here the contribution of the UPR transcription factors XBP-1, ATF6alpha, and ATF6beta to UPR target gene expression. Gene profiling of cell lines lacking these factors yielded several XBP-1-dependent UPR target genes, all of which appear to act in the ER. These included the DnaJ/Hsp40-like genes, p58(IPK), ERdj4, and HEDJ, as well as EDEM, protein disulfide isomerase-P5, and ribosome-associated membrane protein 4 (RAMP4), whereas expression of BiP was only modestly dependent on XBP-1. Surprisingly, given previous reports that enforced expression of ATF6alpha induced a subset of UPR target genes, cells deficient in ATF6alpha, ATF6beta, or both had minimal defects in upregulating UPR target genes by gene profiling analysis, suggesting the presence of compensatory mechanism(s) for ATF6 in the UPR. Since cells lacking both XBP-1 and ATF6alpha had significantly impaired induction of select UPR target genes and ERSE reporter activation, XBP-1 and ATF6alpha may serve partially redundant functions. No UPR target genes that required ATF6beta were identified, nor, in contrast to XBP-1 and ATF6alpha, did the activity of the UPRE or ERSE promoters require ATF6beta, suggesting a minor role for it during the UPR. Collectively, these results suggest that the IRE1/XBP-1 pathway is required for efficient protein folding, maturation, and degradation in the ER and imply the existence of subsets of UPR target genes as defined by their dependence on XBP-1. Further, our observations suggest the existence of additional, as-yet-unknown, key regulators of the UPR.

1,967 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Transcription factor
82.8K papers, 5.4M citations
98% related
Gene expression
113.3K papers, 5.5M citations
97% related
Signal transduction
122.6K papers, 8.2M citations
96% related
Gene
211.7K papers, 10.3M citations
95% related
Cellular differentiation
90.9K papers, 6M citations
94% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023194
2022520
20211,835
20202,294
20192,807
20182,945