Topic
Relational sociology
About: Relational sociology is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 215 publications have been published within this topic receiving 6927 citations. The topic is also known as: Structural interactionism.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue for a relational approach to the agency-structure problem and argue that structure has three dimensions, at its most fundamental, it is a network comprising soci...
Abstract: In this article I argue for a relational approach to the agency–structure problem. Structure has three dimensions from this perspective but, at its most fundamental, it is a network comprising soci...
15 citations
•
01 Jan 2015
TL;DR: In this article, the authors define a dynamic unconscious in social theory and a fluid conceptualization of self and identity by applying the concept of dissociation as the key mechanism for shifting between different self-states.
Abstract: The recent attention which has been paid in sociology to the role of embodiment,
intersubjectivity and reflexivity has resulted in the development of new social theories
which aim to provide better explanations of structure and agency interactions and the
dynamics of self and identity formation. In the process of the development of these
theories, social theorists have often communicated with other relevant disciplines such as
social psychology and psychoanalysis. Clearly, new developments in these related
disciplines are likely to have relevance for micro-sociological theories. The aim of this
project is to further develop modern micro-sociological theories in the light of new ideas in
social psychology and recent understandings in psychoanalysis. Drawing on the ideas of
relational psychoanalysis and relational sociology I have tried to define a dynamic
unconscious in social theory and a fluid conceptualization of self and identity by applying
the concept of dissociation as the key mechanism for shifting between different self-states.
Also, based on the theories of Pierre Bourdieu, Anthony Giddens and Margaret Archer, the
relationship between reflexivity and habitus is explored, different levels of reflexivity and
various forms of consciousness are considered, and these interactions are further
investigated using the two examples of sports training and hypnotic involuntariness. Using
hypnosis as a model, the development of social self and embodied agency is explored in
depth in this context. Furthermore, as a real-life example, the role of subjectivity,
relationality and embodiment in doctor-patient relationships is investigated using findings
in the research fields of hypnosis and placebo. In conclusion, based on the
conceptualization made in this research, the place of two consciousness modalities
(discursive and practical) and forms of unconscious (psychological and psychoanalytical)
is clarified. Finally, the implications of this categorization for understanding core concepts
such as agency, self and identity are explored and some suggestions are made for the
further development and application of the theories explored in this project.
15 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors integrate Simmel's late theory of the relational self into the formal analysis of social relations, generating a framework for theorizing forms of association among self-relating individuals.
Abstract: This article contributes to an ongoing theoretical effort to extend the insights of relational and network sociology into adjacent domains. We integrate Simmel’s late theory of the relational self into the formal analysis of social relations, generating a framework for theorizing forms of association among self-relating individuals. On this model, every “node” in an interaction has relations not only to others but also to itself, specifically between its ideality and its actuality. We go on to integrate this self-relation into a formal model of social relations. This model provides a way to describe configurations of social interactions defined by the forms according to which social relations realize participants’ ideal selves. We examine four formal dimensions along which these self-relational relationships can vary: distance, symmetry, scope, and actualization.
14 citations
••
TL;DR: The authors argue that the main difference between two schools of relational sociology lies in the difference between their respective epistemological stances rat... and argue that their main difference lies in their difference between field theory and social network analysis.
Abstract: I argue that the main difference between two schools of relational sociology – field theory and social network analysis – lies in the difference between their respective epistemological stances rat...
14 citations