Topic
Revised NEO Personality Inventory
About: Revised NEO Personality Inventory is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 494 publications have been published within this topic receiving 44504 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
Patent•
28 Sep 2012TL;DR: An apparatus and method for calculating an internal state for artificial emotions are disclosed, of which the method comprises multiplying an input value obtained from a sensor with a first personality set in accordance with at least one low rank element contained in at least high rank element of a NEO PI-R (Revised NEO Personality Inventory) as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: An apparatus and method for calculating an internal state for artificial emotions are disclosed, of which the method comprises multiplying an input value obtained from a sensor with a first personality set in accordance with at least one low rank element contained in at least one high rank element of a NEO PI-R (Revised NEO Personality Inventory); calculating a personality factor value in a Five-Factor Model of the personality by adding the results of the multiplication; and calculating the internal state by multiplying the personality factor value with a second personality.
4 citations
TL;DR: Higher levels of extraversion were associated with higher pre-challenge cortisol levels and decreased cortisol reactivity during the TSST, however these two findings were statistically independent and underline the importance of considering personality factors when studying stress biology in CMDD patients.
4 citations
TL;DR: The hypothesis that the MMPI–2 Psychopathology–5 scales are better predictors of personality disorders than the Revised NEO Personality Inventory scales was tested using Personality Adjective Checklist personality disorder scales with a 9-point response format, and results provided very little support for the hypothesis of relative superiority of the Psychopathological Inventory domain scales.
Abstract: The hypothesis that the MMPI-2 Psychopathology-5 scales are better predictors of personality disorders than the Revised NEO Personality Inventory scales was tested using Personality Adjective Checklist personality disorder scales with a 9-point response format. The three inventories were completed by 258 introductory psychology students (113 men and 145 women) for partial course credit. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was performed for predicting each Personality Adjective Checklist scale by entering the Revised NEO Personality Inventory scales as a set in the first step and the Psychopathology-5 scales as a set in the second step. Incremental validity of the Psychopathology-5 scales over the Revised NEO Personality Inventory scales for predicting each Personality Adjective Checklist scale was measured by the R2 change at the end of the second step in the hierarchical multiple regression analysis. Incremental validity values ranged from .01 to .09, with a median of .03, and were significant for only five Personality Adjective Checklist scales. Such results provided very little support for the hypothesis of relative superiority of the Psychopathology-5 scales over the Revised NEO Personality Inventory domain scales for predicting personality disorders.
4 citations
01 Mar 2011
TL;DR: The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R), a "Big Five" measure, includes Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness and is used as the operational assessment tool when considering issues of suitability as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: : The United States Air Force (USAF) uses measures of personality based on the Big Five model when psychologically assessing pilots. The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R), a "Big Five" measure, includes Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness and is used as the operational assessment tool when considering issues of suitability. This study compared data from a large USAF pilot sample to the nationally representative normative population to support the use of both sets of norms in clinical evaluation. Specifically, this study examined differences in descriptive statistics, correlations, and factor structures between the sample from USAF pilots and the commercially published norms. Comparisons using gender norms were made in addition to comparisons using combined norms. An initial sample of 12,702 USAF pilot training candidates was administered the NEO PI-R prior to the 53 weeks of Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training. All USAF pilot training candidates were either college graduates or enrolled in college and nearing graduation; many had private pilot licenses or had completed some portion of private pilot license training including flight hours in light aircraft. Results demonstrated that the factor structures were similar, indicating that the test is measuring the personality constructs of interest. Correlations among the domain scores were different, and the means for some domain and facet scores were different, indicating that the pilot sample should be considered in addition to national norms for clinical evaluation. These important differences argue for the compilation of a comprehensive set of pilot norms to be used by clinicians performing personality assessments of pilots.
4 citations
TL;DR: Construct validity of Weinberger's Six-group Typology of Adjustment was investigated by testing the hypothesis that the six personality types have different personality profiles.
Abstract: Construct validity of Weinberger's Six-group Typology of Adjustment was investigated by testing the hypothesis that the six personality types have different personality profiles. The Weinberger Adjustment Inventory and the Revised NEO Personality Inventory were completed by 170 psychology undergraduates (84 men and 86 women). Results strongly supported the tested hypothesis.
3 citations